IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i19p14457-d1253114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Resource Use Efficiency of Potato Production among Smallholder Irrigated Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lelethu Mdoda

    (Discipline of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa)

  • Ajuruchukwu Obi

    (College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, Florida Science Campus, Florida, Roodepoort 1709, South Africa)

  • Nthabeleng Tamako

    (African Centre for Food Security (ACFS), School of Agriculture Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa)

  • Denver Naidoo

    (African Centre for Food Security (ACFS), School of Agriculture Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa)

  • Raesetse Baloyi

    (Discipline of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg 3201, South Africa)

Abstract

Potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) is Africa’s second most-grown crop and is widely used as the staple food after maize. The demand for potato production is increasing and growth in the area under production is estimated at 1.25% a year. Potato has great potential when it comes to food security and farm returns for many smallholder farmers. However, potato productivity is relatively low due to many factors that contribute to the low yield (including drought, poor production practices, and limited access to high-quality seed) and inefficient use of resources. Potato farmers have no access to formal markets, which may reduce the profitability of their enterprises. Additionally, while many studies have been conducted on the resource aspect of vegetable crops, very little is known about the profit efficiency of potato producers in the country. At the same time, efforts to commercialize potato production have not delivered the expected outcomes. This study aimed to estimate the profitability of potatoes, evaluate farm-level efficiency, and identify the factors that influence the efficiency levels of potato farmers in the Eastern Cape Province who engage in irrigation farming. The study used multi-stage and snowball sampling to select 150 smallholder potato farmers from whom primary data were collected using close-ended questionnaires. The data were analyzed using descriptive, gross margin analysis and translog stochastic profit frontier (SPF) modelling. The study found potato production to be profitable by as much as ZAR 7027.11 per annum. It is shown that farm size under potato, seed, pesticides, and fertilisers contribute positively towards the improvement of efficiency while labour and hired tractors negatively affect efficiency. The average technical efficiency of potato production among irrigated smallholder farmers was 89%, indicating that potato farmers could increase output by 11% without increasing inputs. Potato farm size, years spent in school, access to extension services, family size, and non-farm income are socio-economic and institutional factors influencing the farmers’ technical efficiency. However, the farmer’s age, access to credit, and cold storage had a negative effect on their productivity. The study recommends that government and non-governmental organisations strengthen the existing extension service provided to smallholder farmers and make efforts to provide farmers with long-term training and education to increase their productivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Lelethu Mdoda & Ajuruchukwu Obi & Nthabeleng Tamako & Denver Naidoo & Raesetse Baloyi, 2023. "Resource Use Efficiency of Potato Production among Smallholder Irrigated Farmers in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-23, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14457-:d:1253114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14457/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/19/14457/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adewumi, Matthew Olaniyi & Adebayo, Fatimoh. A., 2008. "Profitability and Technical Efficiency of Sweet Potato Production in Nigeria," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 31(5), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Khan Claudette Mengui & Saera Oh & Sang Hyeon Lee, 2019. "The Technical Efficiency of Smallholder Irish Potato Producers in Santa Subdivision, Cameroon," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Bahta, Sirak & Baker, Derek, 2015. "Determinants of Profit Efficiency Among Smallholder Beef Producers in Botswana," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mzuyanda Christian & Ajuruchukwu Obi & Siphe Zantsi & Lelethu Mdoda & Phiwe Jiba, 2024. "The Role of Cooperatives in Improving Smallholder Participation in Agri-Food Value Chains: A Case Study of One Local Municipality in Eastern Cape, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhamad Zahid Muhamad & Mad Nasir Shamsudin & Nitty Hirawaty Kamarulzaman & Nolila Mohd Nawi & Jamaliah Laham, 2022. "Investigating Yield Variability and Technical Efficiency of Smallholders Pineapple Production in Johor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Guangyan Ran & Guangyao Wang & Huijuan Du & Mi Lv, 2023. "Relationship of Cooperative Management and Green and Low-Carbon Transition of Agriculture and Its Impacts: A Case Study of the Western Tarim River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Ramezani, Mohammadreza & Dourandish, Arash & Jamali Jaghdani, Tinoush & Aminizadeh, Milad, 2022. "The influence of dense planting system on the technical efficiency of saffron production and land use sustainability: Empirical evidence from Gonabad county, Iran," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(1).
    4. Aziz Karimov, 2013. "Productive Efficiency of Potato and Melon Growing Farms in Uzbekistan: A Two Stage Double Bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-13, September.
    5. Phyo Pa Pa Aung & Ji-Yong Lee, 2021. "Technical Efficiency of Mung Bean Producers: The Case of Myanmar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Yi Qu & Jing Zhang & Zhenning Wang & Xinning Ma & Guangcheng Wei & Xiangzhi Kong, 2023. "The Future of Agriculture: Obstacles and Improvement Measures for Chinese Cooperatives to Achieve Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    7. Richard E.O Pearce & Abdullah Bah, 2024. "Estimation of Efficiency and the Effect of Access to Finance on Efficiency of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMES) in the Western area of Sierra Leone," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 14(1), pages 1-1.
    8. Runqi Lun & Qiyou Luo & Mingjie Gao & Guojing Li & Tengda Wei, 2023. "How to Break the Bottleneck of Potato Production Sustainable Growth—A Survey from Potato Main Producing Areas in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    9. Haonan Zhang & Zheng Chen & Jieyong Wang & Haitao Wang & Yingwen Zhang, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Pattern of Agricultural Total Factor Productivity Change (Tfpch) in China and Its Implications for Agricultural Sustainable Development," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Shuhua Zhang & Bingjun Li & Yingjie Yang, 2021. "Efficiency Analysis of Scientific and Technological Innovation in Grain Production Based on Improved Grey Incidence Analysis," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-21, December.
    11. Babu, Suresh Chandra & Shishodia, Mahika, 2017. "Agribusiness competitiveness: Applying analytics, typology, and measurements to Africa," IFPRI discussion papers 1648, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Kamau, Philip & Willy, Daniel & Ngare, Lucy, 2020. "Resource Use Efficiency Among Rice Farmers Around Fragile Ecosystems: Evidence From Kilombero Wetland, Tanzania," APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, AGRIMBA, vol. 14(3-4), December.
    13. Eny Budi Sri Haryani & Anna Maria Tri Anggraini, 2022. "Technical Efficiency and Profitability among Maize Based Farmer in Kajola Local Government of Oyo State," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(1), pages 545-553, January.
    14. Rahman, M Sadique & Kazal, Mohammad Mizanul Haque & Rayhan, Shah Johir, 2020. "Improved Management Practices Adoption And Technical Efficiency Of Shrimp Farmers In Bangladesh: A Sample Selection Stochastic Production Frontier Approach," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 41(1), July.
    15. Bahta, S. & Temoso, O. & Mekonnen, D. & Malope, P. & Staal, S., 2018. "Technical efficiency of beef production in agricultural districts of Botswana: A Latent Class Stochastic Frontier Model Approach," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277207, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Mapule Valencia Nkadimeng & Godswill Makombe & Obvious Mapiye & Cletos Mapiye & Isaac Oluwatayo & Kennedy Dzama & Cedric Mojapelo & Naftali Mollel & Jones Ngambi & Madimetja Human Mautjana, 2021. "A gross margin analysis for Nguni cattle farmers in Limpopo Province, South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-13, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:19:p:14457-:d:1253114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.