IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10627-d1187678.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on Soil Parameter Evolution during Ultra-Large Caisson Sinking Based on Artificial Neural Network Back Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zhongwei Li

    (School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Jinda Liang

    (CCCC Second Highway Engineering Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Xinghui Zhang

    (CCCC Second Highway Engineering Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710119, China)

  • Guoliang Dai

    (School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Shuning Cao

    (School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

The determination of soil parameters in geotechnical engineering and their variations during the construction process have long been a focal point for engineering designers. While the artificial neural network (ANN) has been employed for back analysis of soil parameters, its application to caisson sinking processes remains limited. This study focuses on the Nanjing Longtan Yangtze River Bridge project, specifically the south anchoring of an ultra-large rectangular caisson. A comprehensive analysis of the sinking process was conducted using 400 finite element method (FEM) models to obtain the structural stress and earth pressure at key locations. Multiple combinations of soil parameters were considered, resulting in a diverse set of simulation results. These results were then utilized as training samples to develop a back-propagating artificial neural network (BP ANN), which utilized the structural stress and earth pressure as input sets and the soil parameters as output sets. The BP ANN was individually trained for each stage of the sinking process. Subsequently, the trained ANN was employed to predict the soil parameters under different working conditions based on actual monitoring data from engineering projects. The obtained soil parameter variations were further analyzed, leading to the following conclusions: (1) The soil parameters estimated by the ANN exhibited strong agreement with the original values from the geological survey report, validating their reliability; (2) The surrounding soil during the caisson sinking exhibited three distinct states: a stable state prior to the arrival of the cutting edges, a strengthened state upon the arrival of the cutting edges, and a disturbed state after the passage of the cutting edges; (3) In the stable state, the soil parameters closely resembled the original values, whereas in the strengthened state, the soil strength and stiffness significantly increased, while the Poisson’s ratio decreased. In the disturbed state, the soil strength and stiffness were slightly lower than the original values. This study represents a valuable exploration of back analysis for caisson engineering. The findings provide important insights for similar engineering design and construction projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhongwei Li & Jinda Liang & Xinghui Zhang & Guoliang Dai & Shuning Cao, 2023. "Study on Soil Parameter Evolution during Ultra-Large Caisson Sinking Based on Artificial Neural Network Back Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10627-:d:1187678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10627/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10627/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10627-:d:1187678. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.