IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i13p10282-d1182481.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Usage and Microbial Safety of Shared and Unshared Excreta Disposal Facilities in Developing Countries: The Case of a Ghanaian Rural District

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Appiah Obeng

    (Department of Water and Sanitation, University of Cape Coast, P.M.B. University Post Office, Cape Coast, Ghana)

  • Eric Awere

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Cape Coast Technical University, Cape Coast P.O. Box DL 50, Ghana)

  • Panin Asirifua Obeng

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Cape Coast Technical University, Cape Coast P.O. Box DL 50, Ghana)

  • Michael Oteng-Peprah

    (Department of Water and Sanitation, University of Cape Coast, P.M.B. University Post Office, Cape Coast, Ghana)

  • Albert Kaabieredomo Mwinsuubo

    (Department of Water and Sanitation, University of Cape Coast, P.M.B. University Post Office, Cape Coast, Ghana
    Environmental Health and Sanitation Management Department, Ajumako-Enyan-Essiam District Assembly, Ajumako P.O. Box 1, Ghana)

  • Alessandra Bonoli

    (DICAM Department, University of Bologna, via Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Sharon Amanda Quaye

    (Independent Researcher, Accra P.O. Box CT-2912, Ghana)

Abstract

Sharing facilities with other households offers the most realistic opportunity for access to sanitation for many households in low-income settings. However, questions remain about the safety of shared toilets, including those shared at the household level. This study sought to compare the usage and microbial safety of household-level shared and unshared toilets in a Ghanaian rural district to investigate any association between their microbial safety and sharing status. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data on the user characteristics of the sampled toilets, while common contact surfaces (door handles and toilet seats) were assessed for faecal contamination following standard swab sampling and analytical protocols. The results of the study indicate that sharing toilets affords about 90% more household-level access to sanitation as compared to single-household toilets. Toilet sharing mostly occurred between two households, with a maximum user population of 14 per toilet. Generally, there was a high prevalence of faecal contamination on the door handles and seats of both shared and unshared toilets, but this had no association with the sharing status of the toilets. The median concentration of Escherichia coli ( E. coli ) on the door handles and seats of shared toilets was 34.3 × 10 5 and 103.2 × 10 5 CFU/mL, respectively, as compared to 54.7 × 10 5 and 125.0 × 10 5 CFU/mL, respectively, on unshared toilets. In conclusion, the sharing of toilets at the household level nearly doubles access to sanitation at home without necessarily exposing the users to a higher risk of faecal–oral disease transmission.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Appiah Obeng & Eric Awere & Panin Asirifua Obeng & Michael Oteng-Peprah & Albert Kaabieredomo Mwinsuubo & Alessandra Bonoli & Sharon Amanda Quaye, 2023. "Usage and Microbial Safety of Shared and Unshared Excreta Disposal Facilities in Developing Countries: The Case of a Ghanaian Rural District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-11, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10282-:d:1182481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10282/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/13/10282/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prince Antwi-Agyei & Isaac Monney & Kwaku Amaning Adjei & Raphael Kweyu & Sheillah Simiyu, 2022. "Shared but Clean Household Toilets: What Makes This Possible? Evidence from Ghana and Kenya," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-16, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:13:p:10282-:d:1182481. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.