IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9156-d1164869.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Modelling of Biosorptive Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Using Dry Raw Biomasses of Dioscorea rotundata , Elaeis guineensis , Manihot esculenta , Theobroma cacao and Zea mays

Author

Listed:
  • Angel Villabona-Ortíz

    (Process Design and Biomass Utilization Research Group (IDAB), Chemical Engineering Department, Universidad de Cartagena, Avenida del Consulado St. 30, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia)

  • Candelaria Tejada-Tovar

    (Process Design and Biomass Utilization Research Group (IDAB), Chemical Engineering Department, Universidad de Cartagena, Avenida del Consulado St. 30, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia)

  • Ángel Darío González-Delgado

    (Nanomaterials and Computer Aided Process Engineering Research Group (NIPAC), Chemical Engineering Department, Universidad de Cartagena, Avenida del Consulado St. 30, Cartagena de Indias 130015, Colombia)

Abstract

Hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)] is a highly toxic and hazardous contaminant that poses serious health risks to both humans and the environment. Its presence in water sources can lead to severe health issues, including various types of cancer and respiratory ailments. Therefore, developing efficient and effective methods for Cr (VI) removal is crucial in ensuring safe and clean water supplies. The aim of this research is the environmentally responsible elimination of hexavalent chromium by bioadsorption using corn residues (CR), palm fiber (PF), and the peels of yam (YP), cassava (CP), and cocoa (CH). The study was conducted with varying levels of pH, bioadsorbent quantity, temperature, and adsorbent particle size at 200 rpm, with an initial concentration of 100 mg/L and 24 h of contact time to improve the adsorption efficiency. The process variables were evaluated and optimized using the statistical technique response surface methodology (RSM). The SEM-EDS analysis revealed that the predominant elements in the structure of the bioadsorbents were carbon and oxygen. Furthermore, the adsorption process led to the incorporation of Cr (VI) into the structure of the biomaterials, as indicated by their EDS spectra. The maximal adsorption efficiency of 99.11% was obtained at pH 2, bioadsorbent dose of 0.03 mg, 30 °C, and 0.5 mm of particle size. Various equilibrium isotherms were utilized to fit and analyze the adsorption data. The assessed maximum adsorption capacities were 38.84, 56.88, 52.82, 138.94, and 240,948.7 mg/g for YP, PF, CP, CH, and CR, respectively. The adsorption data exhibited conformity with the Freundlich and Redlich–Peterson isotherm models (R 2 = 0.95), indicating that the phenomenon occurs in a multilayer. Pseudo-second order and Elovich kinetic models adjusted the kinetics of chromium (VI), suggesting that the mechanism could be controlled by chemisorption. Therefore, the residual biomasses evaluated can serve as a cost-effective adsorbent for Cr (VI) removal, and the use of RSM enables efficient modeling and prediction of the adsorption process.

Suggested Citation

  • Angel Villabona-Ortíz & Candelaria Tejada-Tovar & Ángel Darío González-Delgado, 2023. "Statistical Modelling of Biosorptive Removal of Hexavalent Chromium Using Dry Raw Biomasses of Dioscorea rotundata , Elaeis guineensis , Manihot esculenta , Theobroma cacao and Zea mays," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-25, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9156-:d:1164869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9156/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9156/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonas Hedberg & Kristin Fransson & Sonja Prideaux & Sandra Roos & Christina Jönsson & Inger Odnevall Wallinder, 2019. "Improving the Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Metal Ecotoxicity: Importance of Chromium Speciation, Water Chemistry, and Metal Release," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Marina Tumolo & Valeria Ancona & Domenico De Paola & Daniela Losacco & Claudia Campanale & Carmine Massarelli & Vito Felice Uricchio, 2020. "Chromium Pollution in European Water, Sources, Health Risk, and Remediation Strategies: An Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-25, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Shi & Dehong Jiang & Junrong Ji & Jinsheng Yan & Huxing Chen, 2022. "Effects of Alkali on Water Soluble Hexavalent Chromium in Ordinary Portland Cement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Monica Laura Zlati & Lucian Puiu Georgescu & Catalina Iticescu & Romeo Victor Ionescu & Valentin Marian Antohi, 2022. "New Approach to Modelling the Impact of Heavy Metals on the European Union’s Water Resources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, December.
    3. Caroline Orset, 2024. "Air, land, and water pollutants and public health expenditures: Empirical data from selected EU countries in the transport sector [Polluants atmosphériques, terrestres et aquatiques et dépenses de ," Post-Print hal-04521160, HAL.
    4. Charlotte Roux & Julien Archez & Corentin Le Gall & Myriam Saadé & Adélaïde Féraille & Jean-François Caron, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Material: Optimizing Geopolymer Mortar Formulations for 3D Printing: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    5. Muhammad Umar Hayyat & Rab Nawaz & Ali Irfan & Sami A. Al-Hussain & Mehlil Aziz & Zafar Siddiq & Sajjad Ahmad & Magdi E. A. Zaki, 2023. "Evaluating the Phytoremediation Potential of Eichhornia crassipes for the Removal of Cr and Li from Synthetic Polluted Water," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Marina Tumolo & Angela Volpe & Natalia Leone & Pietro Cotugno & Domenico De Paola & Daniela Losacco & Vito Locaputo & Maria Concetta de Pinto & Vito Felice Uricchio & Valeria Ancona, 2022. "Enhanced Natural Attenuation of Groundwater Cr(VI) Pollution Using Electron Donors: Yeast Extract vs. Polyhydroxybutyrate," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-17, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9156-:d:1164869. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.