IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7928-d1145210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Smart Greenhouse Virtual Reality Curriculum Based on STEAM Education

Author

Listed:
  • Chuang-Yeh Huang

    (Department of Tropical Agriculture and International Cooperation, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

  • Bo-Yuan Cheng

    (General Research Service Center, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Shuefu Road, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

  • Shi-Jer Lou

    (Graduate Institute of Technological and Vocational Education, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Shuefu Road, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

  • Chih-Chao Chung

    (General Research Service Center, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Shuefu Road, Neipu, Pingtung 91201, Taiwan)

Abstract

This study developed a smart greenhouse virtual reality (VR) curriculum based on STEAM learning and explored its effects on students’ satisfaction and learning outcomes. The objectives included evaluating STEAM capability indicators, the practicability of VR-assisted teaching, constructing the VR curriculum, discussing students’ satisfaction, and assessing the impact on learning effectiveness. The fuzzy Delphi method was used to evaluate the importance of STEAM capabilities and the practicability of VR-assisted teaching. Experimental teaching was carried out on 26 engineering students, and the case study method was adopted for hybrid analysis and discussion based on quality and quantity. The study found that “hands-on skills” and “problem-solving” were the most important capabilities, with the highest practicability in VR-assisted teaching. Based on this, an analysis was conducted on the integrated teaching design, and the smart greenhouse VR teaching materials based on STEAM learning were developed. After 18 weeks of experimental teaching, most students expressed significant positive affirmation of their satisfaction with the “STEAM smart greenhouse VR” curriculum. The study highlights the importance of hands-on skills and problem-solving in VR-assisted teaching. The study suggests that the practicability analysis of VR-assisted teaching should be reviewed according to the curriculum characteristics, and three phases of VR-assisted teaching modes, such as teacher operation, student exercises, and student testing, should be planned to guide students to learn step by step. The curriculum design and planning based on STEAM learning in this study could provide a reference for teachers and researchers to plan students’ STEAM capability training and interdisciplinary capability learning and development. The study highlights the importance of hands-on skills, problem-solving in VR-assisted teaching, and the positive impact of multi-sensory experiences on student learning outcomes. These findings can inform the development of future VR-assisted teaching materials and curricula.

Suggested Citation

  • Chuang-Yeh Huang & Bo-Yuan Cheng & Shi-Jer Lou & Chih-Chao Chung, 2023. "Design and Effectiveness Evaluation of a Smart Greenhouse Virtual Reality Curriculum Based on STEAM Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7928-:d:1145210
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chih-Chao Chung & Chien-Linag Lin & Shi-Jer Lou, 2018. "Analysis of the Learning Effectiveness of the STEAM-6E Special Course—A Case Study about the Creative Design of IoT Assistant Devices for the Elderly," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Peng-Wei Hsiao & Chung-Ho Su, 2021. "A Study on the Impact of STEAM Education for Sustainable Development Courses and Its Effects on Student Motivation and Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Chuang-Yeh Huang & Shi-Jer Lou & Yuh-Ming Cheng & Chih-Chao Chung, 2020. "Research on Teaching a Welding Implementation Course Assisted by Sustainable Virtual Reality Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hsien-Sheng Hsiao & Jyun-Chen Chen & Jhen-Han Chen & Yu-Ting Zeng & Guang-Han Chung, 2022. "An Assessment of Junior High School Students’ Knowledge, Creativity, and Hands-On Performance Using PBL via Cognitive–Affective Interaction Model to Achieve STEAM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Ting-Chia Hsu & Hal Abelson & Natalie Lao & Shih-Chu Chen, 2021. "Is It Possible for Young Students to Learn the AI-STEAM Application with Experiential Learning?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Yu-Hsuan Lin & Hao-Chiang Koong Lin & Tao-Hua Wang & Cheng-Hsun Wu, 2023. "Integrating the STEAM-6E Model with Virtual Reality Instruction: The Contribution to Motivation, Effectiveness, Satisfaction, and Creativity of Learners with Diverse Cognitive Styles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Yuli Rahmawati & Elisabeth Taylor & Peter Charles Taylor & Achmad Ridwan & Alin Mardiah, 2022. "Students’ Engagement in Education as Sustainability: Implementing an Ethical Dilemma-STEAM Teaching Model in Chemistry Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Linghan Zhang & Junyi Zhang, 2018. "Impacts of Leisure and Tourism on the Elderly’s Quality of Life in Intimacy: A Comparative Study in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Andra-Teodora Gorski & Elena-Diana Ranf & Dorel Badea & Elisabeta-Emilia Halmaghi & Hortensia Gorski, 2023. "Education for Sustainability—Some Bibliometric Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Gregor Wolbring & Simerta Gill, 2023. "Potential Impact of Environmental Activism: A Survey and a Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-46, February.
    8. Giancarlo Marcone, 2022. "Humanities and Social Sciences in Relation to Sustainable Development Goals and STEM Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Na Li & Ping Jiang & Cuihong Li & Wei Wang, 2022. "College Teaching Innovation from the Perspective of Sustainable Development: The Construction and Twelve-Year Practice of the 2P3E4R System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, June.
    10. Peng-Wei Hsiao & Chung-Ho Su, 2021. "A Study on the Impact of STEAM Education for Sustainable Development Courses and Its Effects on Student Motivation and Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7928-:d:1145210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.