IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7863-d1144390.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Animal Husbandry in the Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni National Park: An Economic-Structural Analysis for the Protection and Enhancement of the Territory and Local Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Michele Cerrato

    (Degree Course of Agriculture, Dipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy)

  • Giuliana Benincasa

    (Degree Course of Agriculture, Dipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy)

  • Allegra Iasi

    (Degree Course of Agriculture, Dipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy)

  • Maria Pergola

    (Degree Course of Agriculture, Dipartimento di Farmacia, Università degli Studi di Salerno, Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, 84084 Fisciano, Italy)

Abstract

This research seeks to deepen the current economic and structural aspects of the livestock farms in the rural territory “Casacastra” (Cilento area), to identify critical issues and development opportunities with the intention to enhance and protect the territory under study also through strengthening forms of local economy. Information about the consistency and the typology of livestock farms present in the study area, and the trend in the last twelve years, were acquired thought the consultation of the national livestock register of the Italian Ministry of Health. Subsequently, a questionnaire was submitted to a sample of farmers to better know the characteristics of the breeders and of the husbandries. The results showed that in the study area, there are 4% of the cattle and sheep herds of the Campania Region, and 7% of those with goats. The most representative farm size is the class with less than 20 animals per breeding type, and between 2010 and 2022, there has been a reduction in the number of all types of analyzed husbandries. The most represented productive orientation is that for meat, while the specialization in the production of milk in sheep and goat breeding is completely absent. The interviews revealed that the breeders are almost all over 40 years of age, with middle and high school qualifications and consolidated experience. The workforce involved in the farms is mainly the family one and often breeders are people engaged in other non-agricultural activities. Despite the permanence in some cases of archaic husbandry methods, the breeders play a key role in the study area for the protection of the territory, and the conservation and enhancement of local animal and plant genetic resources are at risk of extinction. Moreover, the survival of this rural context is linked to the development of new forms of local economy, such as the definition of an experiential rural tourist offer, in which the presence of institutions plays a fundamental role.

Suggested Citation

  • Michele Cerrato & Giuliana Benincasa & Allegra Iasi & Maria Pergola, 2023. "Animal Husbandry in the Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni National Park: An Economic-Structural Analysis for the Protection and Enhancement of the Territory and Local Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7863-:d:1144390
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sardaro, Ruggiero & La Sala, Piermichele & De Pascale, Gianluigi & Faccilongo, Nicola, 2021. "The conservation of cultural heritage in rural areas: Stakeholder preferences regarding historical rural buildings in Apulia, southern Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    2. Salvatore, Rita & Chiodo, Emilio & Fantini, Andrea, 2018. "Tourism transition in peripheral rural areas: Theories, issues and strategies," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 41-51.
    3. Mastronardi, Luigi & Giannelli, Agostino & Romagnoli, Luca, 2021. "Detecting the land use of ancient transhumance routes (Tratturi) and their potential for Italian inner areas’ growth," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Cucari, Nicola & Wankowicz, Ewa & Esposito De Falco, Salvatore, 2019. "Rural tourism and Albergo Diffuso: A case study for sustainable land-use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 105-119.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michele Cerrato & Maria Pergola & Gianni Ruggiero, 2024. "Can Sustainability and Biodiversity Conservation Save Native Goat Breeds? The Situation in Campania Region (Southern Italy) between History and Regional Policy Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-18, April.
    2. Michele Cerrato & Allegra Iasi & Federica Di Bennardo & Maria Pergola, 2023. "Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Sustainability of Livestock Farms in Inland Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buongiorno, Alessandro & Intini, Mario, 2021. "Sustainable tourism and mobility development in natural protected areas: Evidence from Apulia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    2. Qi Mu & Fabrizio Aimar, 2022. "How Are Historical Villages Changed? A Systematic Literature Review on European and Chinese Cultural Heritage Preservation Practices in Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Sardaro, Ruggiero & La Sala, Piermichele & De Pascale, Gianluigi & Faccilongo, Nicola, 2021. "The conservation of cultural heritage in rural areas: Stakeholder preferences regarding historical rural buildings in Apulia, southern Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    4. Georgică Gheorghe & Petronela Tudorache & Ioan Mihai Roşca, 2023. "The Contribution of Green Marketing in the Development of a Sustainable Destination through Advanced Clustering Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    5. Chiara Aleffi & Sabrina Tomasi & Concetta Ferrara & Cristina Santini & Gigliola Paviotti & Federica Baldoni & Alessio Cavicchi, 2020. "Universities and Wineries: Supporting Sustainable Development in Disadvantaged Rural Areas," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Xue Jiang & Xiaoya Song & Hongyu Zhao & Haoran Zhang, 2021. "Rural Tourism Network Evaluation Based on Resource Control Ability Analysis: A Case Study of Ning’an, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Pengyang Zhang & Lewen Zhang & Dandan Han & Tingting Wang & He Zhu & Yongtao Chen, 2023. "Coupled and Coordinated Development of the Tourism Industry and Urbanization in Marginal and Less Developed Regions—Taking the Mountainous Border Areas of Western Yunnan as a Case Study," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    8. Seweryn Zielinski & Yoonjeong Jeong & Seong-il Kim & Celene B. Milanés, 2020. "Why Community-Based Tourism and Rural Tourism in Developing and Developed Nations are Treated Differently? A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Palazzo, Maria & Vollero, Agostino & Vitale, Pierluigi & Siano, Alfonso, 2021. "Urban and rural destinations on Instagram: Exploring the influencers’ role in #sustainabletourism," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Emilio Chiodo & Héctor Luis Adriani & Fernando Pablo Navarro & Rita Salvatore, 2019. "Collaborative Processes and Collective Impact in Tourist Rural Villages—Insights from a Comparative Analysis between Argentinian and Italian Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, January.
    11. José Ramón-Cardona & María Dolores Sánchez-Fernández, 2022. "Innovation and Strategic Management for the Development of Tourist Destinations: Development of Nightlife and Residents’ Attitudes in Punta del Este (Uruguay)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    12. O. E. Prusikhin & E. D. Zhukovsky & O. D. Krutov & A. I. Alekseev & A. M. Ershov & M. A. Borisenko, 2022. "Transformation of an Agricultural District into a Recreational District (a Case Study of Chemalsky District in the Republic of Altai)," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 250-259, June.
    13. Pierpaolo D’Urso & Livia Giovanni & Marta Disegna & Riccardo Massari & Vincenzina Vitale, 2021. "A Tourist Segmentation Based on Motivation, Satisfaction and Prior Knowledge with a Socio-Economic Profiling: A Clustering Approach with Mixed Information," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 335-360, February.
    14. Yifan Zhu & Chengkang Wang & Takeru Sakai, 2019. "Remote Sensing-Based Analysis of Landscape Pattern Evolution in Industrial Rural Areas: A Case of Southern Jiangsu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Francesco Scorza & Rachele Vanessa Gatto, 2023. "Identifying Territorial Values for Tourism Development: The Case Study of Calabrian Greek Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Cucari Nicola & Esposito Eduardo & D’Angelo Eugenio & Ciasullo Maria Vincenza, 2020. "Assessing the Social Entrepreneurship Business Model: An Exploratory Case Study in the Italian Cultural Heritage Sector," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-31, October.
    17. Michał Roman & Josef Abrham & Arkadiusz Niedziółka & Ewa Szczucka & Lubos Smutka & Piotr Prus, 2022. "Tourist Attractiveness of Rural Areas as a Determinant of the Implementation of Social Tourism of Disadvantaged Groups: Evidence from Poland and the Czech Republic," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Yunxing Zhang & Weizhen Li & Ziyang Li & Meiyu Yang & Feifei Zhai & Zhigang Li & Heng Yao & Haidong Li, 2022. "Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Key Rural Tourism Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, October.
    19. Cecilia Arnaiz-Schmitz & Cristina Herrero-Jáuregui & María F. Schmitz, 2021. "Recreational and Nature-Based Tourism as a Cultural Ecosystem Service. Assessment and Mapping in a Rural-Urban Gradient of Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Anestis Fotiadis & Guych Nuryyev & Jennet Achyldurdyyeva & Anastasia Spyridou, 2019. "The Impact of EU Sponsorship, Size, and Geographic Characteristics on Rural Tourism Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7863-:d:1144390. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.