IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i10p7849-d1144075.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning Analytics on Student Engagement to Enhance Students’ Learning Performance: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Nurul Atiqah Johar

    (School of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia)

  • Si Na Kew

    (Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia
    National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

  • Zaidatun Tasir

    (School of Education, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai 81310, Malaysia)

  • Elizabeth Koh

    (National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798, Singapore)

Abstract

The study of learning analytics provides statistical analysis and extract insights from data, particularly in education. Various studies regarding student engagement in online learning have been conducted at tertiary institutions to verify its effects on students’ learning performance. However, there exists a knowledge gap whereby the types of student-engagement issues derived from learning analytics have not been collectively studied thus far. In order to bridge the knowledge gap, this paper engages a new systematic literature review (SLR) that analysed 42 articles using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The existing research on student engagement in online learning does not extensively integrate the five types of online engagement proposed by Redmond et al., and the use of learning analytics on the subject matter is also limited. Thus, this review sheds light on the types of student engagement indicated by using learning analytics, hoping to enhance students’ learning performance in online learning. As revealed in the findings, some studies measured multifaceted engagement to enhance students’ learning performance, but they are limited in number. Thus, it is recommended that future research incorporate multifaceted engagement such as social, cognitive, collaborative, behavioural, and emotional engagement in online learning and utilise learning analytics to improve students’ learning performance. This review could serve as the basis for future research in online higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Nurul Atiqah Johar & Si Na Kew & Zaidatun Tasir & Elizabeth Koh, 2023. "Learning Analytics on Student Engagement to Enhance Students’ Learning Performance: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7849-:d:1144075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7849/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/10/7849/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jung-Sook Lee, 2014. "The Relationship Between Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Is It a Myth or Reality?," The Journal of Educational Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(3), pages 177-185, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brina Kurent & Stanislav Avsec, 2023. "Systems Thinking Skills and the ICT Self-Concept in Preschool Teachers for Sustainable Curriculum Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Mahadi Bahari & Ibrahim Arpaci & Nurulhuda Firdaus Mohd Azmi & Liyana Shuib, 2023. "Predicting the Intention to Use Learning Analytics for Academic Advising in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk & Agnieszka Żabicka & Agata Gawlak & Joanna Gil-Mastalerczyk, 2023. "Leveraging Systems Thinking, Engagement, and Digital Competencies to Enhance First-Year Architecture Students’ Achievement in Design-Based Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-33, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Carroll & Chris Heaton & Massimiliano Tani, 2019. "Does It Pay to Graduate from an 'Elite' University in Australia?," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 95(310), pages 343-357, September.
    2. Ramón Gómez-Chacón & Nicolás Fernández-Martínez & Pablo Gálvez-Ruiz, 2021. "Healthy Students: Adaptation and Validation of the Instrument from the Workplace to the Educational Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Josep Petchamé & Ignasi Iriondo & Xavi Canaleta & David Riu & Silvia Necchi, 2021. "Engaging ICT Engineering Undergraduates in a Management Subject through First Day of Class Activities: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Cristian Bortes & Mattias Strandh & Karina Nilsson, 2020. "Parental Illness and Young People’s Education," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(6), pages 2069-2091, December.
    5. Tomasz Gajderowicz & Maciej Jakubowski & Sylwia Wrona & Ghadah Alkhadim, 2023. "Is students’ teamwork a dreamwork? A new DCE-based multidimensional approach to preferences towards group work," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Hexin Yang & Chaoyue Wu & Ji-Kang Chen, 2022. "Interparental and Intergenerational Co-parenting Conflict and Adolescent Academic Performance: The Mediating Roles of Adolescent Academic Engagement and Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-10, November.
    7. Fatima Khalid & Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Chai Bin-Feng & Nighat Saeed, 2020. "Learning Engagements and the Role of Religion," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440199, January.
    8. Sarra Ayouni & Fahima Hajjej & Mohamed Maddeh & Shaha Al-Otaibi, 2021. "A new ML-based approach to enhance student engagement in online environment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:10:p:7849-:d:1144075. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.