IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p467-d1017010.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Complexity and Experience of Women Undergraduate Students within the Engineering Domain

Author

Listed:
  • Mellissa Hardtke

    (School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Leila Khanjaninejad

    (Department of Management, Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
    Transdisciplinary School, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Candace Lang

    (School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

  • Noushin Nasiri

    (School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia)

Abstract

Despite continuous efforts for reducing gender inequality in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics (STEM), engineering still steadfastly remains one of the least equitable fields in Australian universities. There has been an increasing growth of international scholarship on women’s underrepresentation in engineering; nevertheless, research on understanding contributing factors to the Australian women students’ participation in engineering is relatively underdeveloped. To address this knowledge gap, we examine the experience of women undergraduate students and explore influential factors that contribute to the complexity of pursuing engineering. Applying a qualitative approach, we conducted 16 interviews with women undergraduate students enrolled across five engineering courses at Macquarie University, Australia. The results of the thematic analysis indicate that women students often have a supporting network of relationships and view themselves as intellectually fit to study engineering. However, they have been facing several interrelated obstacles that negatively impact their experiences and persistence in engineering. Findings show that gendered perceptions around femininity and masculinity appear to be the origin of gender stereotypes surrounding engineering identity. These not only negatively impact women students’ experiences within the bound of university but also create systemic barriers in the future workplace environment and opportunities. These (mis)perceptions have actively and passively made women students feel out of place, doubt their abilities and feel alienated. We offer suggestions to shift engineering identity outside the dominant masculine construct towards ‘co-construct’ and ‘co-enact’. This will create windows of opportunities to move towards gender equality in engineering.

Suggested Citation

  • Mellissa Hardtke & Leila Khanjaninejad & Candace Lang & Noushin Nasiri, 2022. "Gender Complexity and Experience of Women Undergraduate Students within the Engineering Domain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:467-:d:1017010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/467/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/467/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:467-:d:1017010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.