IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p299-d1014004.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative Assessment of Spatial Pattern of Geodiversity in the Tibetan Plateau

Author

Listed:
  • Tianyu Rong

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Shuting Xu

    (University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yayan Lu

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yanjun Tong

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Zhaoping Yang

    (State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

Geodiversity is considered a new tool to exploit the resources of regional and local geotourism. Hitherto, few assessments of geodiversity have been conceived for huge geographic units. The spatial pattern of geodiversity in the Tibetan Plateau (TP) is the purpose of this study. A total of 96 abiotic units in six geo-groups of hydrology, pedology, landform, elevation, geology, and geosites were quantified and normalized to assess the geodiversity index. Geosites that represent interdisciplinary and specific abiotic elements are included as an independent component in the parameters of geodiversity assessment. The TP was divided into 1145 areas by fishnet, for counting of abiotic units, geodiversity calculation, and visualization of findings. The results indicated that the Pamir Plateau, Mt. Kunlun, the Delingha area, Mt. Qilian, the Xining area, Langmusi Town, Mt. Siguniang, Mt. Hengduan, the Nyainqentanglha Range, and the Lhasa area are the zones with very high geodiversity. The low geodiversity areas are mainly concentrated in the Qaidam Basin, the Qingnan Plateau, and the South Tibet region. In the TP, international tourist destinations such as UNESCO World Natural Heritage Sites and Global Geoparks, are developed in areas of high geodiversity. The spatial pattern of geodiversity could be indicative of geotourism potential, and be used to guide the development planning of geotourism in the TP. The quantitative assessment of geodiversity also provides a new parameter for geoconservation in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianyu Rong & Shuting Xu & Yayan Lu & Yanjun Tong & Zhaoping Yang, 2022. "Quantitative Assessment of Spatial Pattern of Geodiversity in the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:299-:d:1014004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/299/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/299/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laura Comănescu & Alexandru Nedelea, 2020. "Geoheritage and Geodiversity Education in Romania: Formal and Non-Formal Analysis Based on Questionnaires," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, November.
    2. Adolfo Quesada-Román & Lidia Torres-Bernhard & Maynor A. Ruiz-Álvarez & Manuel Rodríguez-Maradiaga & Gema Velázquez-Espinoza & Catalina Espinosa-Vega & Jaime Toral & Hugo Rodríguez-Bolaños, 2021. "Geodiversity, Geoconservation, and Geotourism in Central America," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2021. "Quantitative-Qualitative Method for Quick Assessment of Geodiversity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Andrea Ferrando & Francesco Faccini & Guido Paliaga & Paola Coratza, 2021. "A Quantitative GIS and AHP Based Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment and Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Ruiyao Xu & Zhaoping Yang & Xiaoliang Xu, 2022. "OUV Analysis and Global Comparative Study of Karakoram-Pamir World Natural Heritage Potential Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2021. "Qualitative-Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity of Western Samoa (SW Pacific) to Identify Places of Interest for Further Geoconservation, Geoeducation, and Geotourism Development," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Borut Stojilković, 2022. "Towards Transferable Use of Terrain Ruggedness Component in the Geodiversity Index," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2023. "Recognition of Potential Geosites Utilizing a Hydrological Model within Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Laura Valentini & Veronica Guerra & Olivia Nesci, 2023. "The Mt. Catria–Mt. Nerone Ridge in the North-Marchean Apennines (Central Italy): A Potential Geopark?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.
    5. José Luis Goy & Jose Luis Corvea & Irene de Bustamante & Antonio Miguel Martínez-Graña & Carlos Díaz-Guanche & Caridad Zazo & Cristino J. Dabrio & José Ángel González-Delgado & Alberto Blanco & Carlos, 2023. "Geomorphological Heritage in Viñales National Park (Aspiring UNESCO Geopark): Geomatic Tools Applied to Geotourism in Pinar del Río, Cuba," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Geomorphological Model Comparison for Geosites, Utilizing Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity, Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, October.
    8. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Sifeng Nian & Donghe Li & Jie Zhang & Song Lu & Xiaowan Zhang, 2023. "Stimulus-Organism-Response Framework: Is the Perceived Outstanding Universal Value Attractiveness of Tourists Beneficial to World Heritage Site Conservation?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Mária Barančoková & Daniela Hutárová & Maroš Nikolaj, 2023. "Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity for Conservation Purposes in Slovenské rudohorie Mountains (Slovakia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.
    11. Pietro Marescotti & Giulia Castello & Antonino Briguglio & Maria Cristina Caprioglio & Laura Crispini & Marco Firpo, 2022. "Geosite Assessment in the Beigua UNESCO Global Geopark (Liguria, Italy): A Case Study in Linking Geoheritage with Education, Tourism, and Community Involvement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Antonio Martínez-Graña & José Angel González-Delgado & Carlos Nieto & Vanessa Villalba & Teresa Cabero, 2023. "Geodiversity and Geoheritage to Promote Geotourism Using Augmented Reality and 3D Virtual Flights in the Arosa Estuary (NW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Paola Coratza & Irene Maria Bollati & Valeria Panizza & Pierluigi Brandolini & Doriano Castaldini & Franco Cucchi & Giacomo Deiana & Maurizio Del Monte & Francesco Faccini & Furio Finocchiaro & Dario , 2021. "Advances in Geoheritage Mapping: Application to Iconic Geomorphological Examples from the Italian Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-37, October.
    14. Tomasz Bartuś & Wojciech Mastej, 2023. "Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    15. Vassiliki Vlami & Carlos Morera Beita & Stamatis Zogaris, 2022. "Landscape Conservation Assessment in the Latin American Tropics: Application and Insights from Costa Rica," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:299-:d:1014004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.