IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i7p3881-d779418.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wildfire Risk Forecasting Using Weights of Evidence and Statistical Index Models

Author

Listed:
  • Ghafar Salavati

    (Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Shahid Beheshti St Central Organization of the University, Gorgan 4913815739, Iran)

  • Ebrahim Saniei

    (Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Shahid Beheshti St Central Organization of the University, Gorgan 4913815739, Iran)

  • Ebrahim Ghaderpour

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

  • Quazi K. Hassan

    (Department of Geomatics Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada)

Abstract

The risk of forest and pasture fires is one of the research topics of interest around the world. Applying precise strategies to prevent potential effects and minimize the occurrence of such incidents requires modeling. This research was conducted in the city of Sanandaj, which is located in the west of the province of Kurdistan and the west of Iran. In this study, fire risk potential was assessed using weights of evidence (WoE) and statistical index (SI) models. Information about fire incidents in Sanandaj (2011–2020) was divided into two parts: educational data (2011–2017) and validation data (2018–2020). Factors considered for potential forest and rangeland fire risk in Sanandaj city included altitude, slope percentage, slope direction, distance from the road, distance from the river, land use/land cover (LULC), average annual rainfall, and average annual temperature. Finally, in order to validate the two models used, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used. The results for the WoE and SI models showed that about 62.96% and 52.75% of the study area, respectively, were in the moderate risk to very high risk classes. In addition, the results of the ROC curve analysis showed that the WoE and SI models had area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.741 and 0.739, respectively. Although the input parameters for both models were the same, the WoE model showed a slightly higher AUC value compared to the SI model, and can potentially be used to predict future fire risk in the study area. The results of this study can help decision makers and managers take the necessary precautions to prevent forest and rangeland fires and/or to minimize fire damage.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghafar Salavati & Ebrahim Saniei & Ebrahim Ghaderpour & Quazi K. Hassan, 2022. "Wildfire Risk Forecasting Using Weights of Evidence and Statistical Index Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-15, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3881-:d:779418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3881/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/7/3881/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorena Liuzzo & Vincenzo Sammartano & Gabriele Freni, 2019. "Comparison between Different Distributed Methods for Flood Susceptibility Mapping," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(9), pages 3155-3173, July.
    2. Shruti Sachdeva & Tarunpreet Bhatia & A. K. Verma, 2018. "GIS-based evolutionary optimized Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for forest fire susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1399-1418, July.
    3. Naderpour, Mohsen & Rizeei, Hossein Mojaddadi & Khakzad, Nima & Pradhan, Biswajeet, 2019. "Forest fire induced Natech risk assessment: A survey of geospatial technologies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Keane, Robert E. & Drury, Stacy A. & Karau, Eva C. & Hessburg, Paul F. & Reynolds, Keith M., 2010. "A method for mapping fire hazard and risk across multiple scales and its application in fire management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(1), pages 2-18.
    5. Minerva Singh & Zhuhua Huang, 2022. "Analysis of Forest Fire Dynamics, Distribution and Main Drivers in the Atlantic Forest," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Amatulli, Giuseppe & Peréz-Cabello, Fernando & de la Riva, Juan, 2007. "Mapping lightning/human-caused wildfires occurrence under ignition point location uncertainty," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 200(3), pages 321-333.
    7. Hamed Adab & Kasturi Kanniah & Karim Solaimani, 2013. "Modeling forest fire risk in the northeast of Iran using remote sensing and GIS techniques," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(3), pages 1723-1743, February.
    8. Hassan Abedi Gheshlaghi & Bakhtiar Feizizadeh & Thomas Blaschke, 2020. "GIS-based forest fire risk mapping using the analytical network process and fuzzy logic," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(3), pages 481-499, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ayesha Maqbool & Alina Mirza & Farkhanda Afzal & Tajammul Shah & Wazir Zada Khan & Yousaf Bin Zikria & Sung Won Kim, 2022. "System-Level Performance Analysis of Cooperative Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Wildfire Surveillance Using Agent-Based Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Osama Ashraf Mohammed & Sasan Vafaei & Mehdi Mirzaei Kurdalivand & Sabri Rasooli & Chaolong Yao & Tongxin Hu, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Forest Fire Mapping Using GIS-Based Data Mining Approaches in Western Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    3. José Francisco de Oliveira-Júnior & Munawar Shah & Ayesha Abbas & Washington Luiz Félix Correia Filho & Carlos Antonio da Silva Junior & Dimas de Barros Santiago & Paulo Eduardo Teodoro & David Mendes, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of Fire Foci and Environmental Degradation in the Biomes of Northeastern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarkawt G. Salar & Arsalan Ahmed Othman & Sabri Rasooli & Salahalddin S. Ali & Zaid T. Al-Attar & Veraldo Liesenberg, 2022. "GIS-Based Modeling for Vegetated Land Fire Prediction in Qaradagh Area, Kurdistan Region, Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-31, May.
    2. Osama Ashraf Mohammed & Sasan Vafaei & Mehdi Mirzaei Kurdalivand & Sabri Rasooli & Chaolong Yao & Tongxin Hu, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Forest Fire Mapping Using GIS-Based Data Mining Approaches in Western Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Naderpour, Mohsen & Rizeei, Hossein Mojaddadi & Khakzad, Nima & Pradhan, Biswajeet, 2019. "Forest fire induced Natech risk assessment: A survey of geospatial technologies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Dingli Liu & Zhisheng Xu & Chuangang Fan, 2019. "Predictive analysis of fire frequency based on daily temperatures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1175-1189, July.
    5. Saeedeh Eskandari & Mahdis Amiri & Nitheshnirmal Sãdhasivam & Hamid Reza Pourghasemi, 2020. "Comparison of new individual and hybrid machine learning algorithms for modeling and mapping fire hazard: a supplementary analysis of fire hazard in different counties of Golestan Province in Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 104(1), pages 305-327, October.
    6. Polash Banerjee, 2022. "MODIS-FIRMS and ground-truthing-based wildfire likelihood mapping of Sikkim Himalaya using machine learning algorithms," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 899-935, January.
    7. Chaoxue Tan & Zhongke Feng, 2023. "Mapping Forest Fire Risk Zones Using Machine Learning Algorithms in Hunan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, April.
    8. Seidl, Rupert & Fernandes, Paulo M. & Fonseca, Teresa F. & Gillet, François & Jönsson, Anna Maria & Merganičová, Katarína & Netherer, Sigrid & Arpaci, Alexander & Bontemps, Jean-Daniel & Bugmann, Hara, 2011. "Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(4), pages 903-924.
    9. Shruti Sachdeva & Tarunpreet Bhatia & A. K. Verma, 2018. "GIS-based evolutionary optimized Gradient Boosted Decision Trees for forest fire susceptibility mapping," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1399-1418, July.
    10. James Gaboardi, 2020. "Validating Abstract Representations of Spatial Population Data while considering Disclosure Avoidance," Working Papers 20-5, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    11. Mohamad Khoirun Najib & Sri Nurdiati & Ardhasena Sopaheluwakan, 2022. "Multivariate fire risk models using copula regression in Kalimantan, Indonesia," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 113(2), pages 1263-1283, September.
    12. Hamed Adab & Kasturi Devi Kanniah & Karim Solaimani, 2021. "Remote sensing-based operational modeling of fuel ignitability in Hyrcanian mixed forest, Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 253-283, August.
    13. Benavent-Corai, J. & Rojo, C. & Suárez-Torres, J. & Velasco-García, L., 2007. "Scaling properties in forest fire sequences: The human role in the order of nature," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 205(3), pages 336-342.
    14. Abolfazl Jaafari & Omid Rahmati & Eric K. Zenner & Davood Mafi-Gholami, 2022. "Anthropogenic activities amplify wildfire occurrence in the Zagros eco-region of western Iran," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(1), pages 457-473, October.
    15. Diana Mancilla-Ruiz & Francisco de la Barrera & Sergio González & Ana Huaico, 2021. "The Effects of a Megafire on Ecosystem Services and the Pace of Landscape Recovery," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Kwadwo YEBOAH BOTAH, 2023. "Forest Fires In A Changing Climate: Risk Assessment And Management In Leiria National Forest, Portugal," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 9(2), pages 169-191, December.
    17. Feliu Serra-Burriel & Pedro Delicado & Fernando M. Cucchietti, 2021. "Wildfires Vegetation Recovery through Satellite Remote Sensing and Functional Data Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Keane, Robert E. & Karau, Eva, 2010. "Evaluating the ecological benefits of wildfire by integrating fire and ecosystem simulation models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1162-1172.
    19. Y. Supriya & Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, 2023. "Particle Swarm-Based Federated Learning Approach for Early Detection of Forest Fires," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    20. José Ramón González‐Olabarria & Blas Mola‐Yudego & Lluis Coll, 2015. "Different Factors for Different Causes: Analysis of the Spatial Aggregations of Fire Ignitions in Catalonia (Spain)," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(7), pages 1197-1209, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:7:p:3881-:d:779418. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.