IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i6p3350-d769973.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation on Seismic Performance of Beam-Column Joints of Fabricated Steel Structure with Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Elements

Author

Listed:
  • Yuanqi Li

    (College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

  • Binhui Huang

    (College of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China)

Abstract

This research proposes a beam-column hinged joint with additional replaceable energy-dissipating elements, which is highly industrialized and fully fabricated. In this structure, steel beam and steel column are hinged with pins, at which corners a replaceable energy dissipation element is added. The energy dissipation element is rigidly connected to the steel column through a section of H-beam and high-strength bolts and is hinged to the steel beam using high-strength bolts. The main materials, such as energy dissipation elements, steel columns, and steel beams, are all steel with a design yield strength of 345 MPa. Under the condition that the vertical clear distance between the energy dissipation element and the steel beam is constant at 0.2 m, and the size and section of the beams and columns remain unchanged, six groups of different test samples are constructed by changing the thickness and the horizontal length of the energy-dissipating element. Through the experimental research and numerical simulation of 6 groups of specimens, the strength, stiffness, ductility, hysteresis curve, energy dissipation coefficient, equivalent viscous damping coefficient, and failure mechanism of the joints are obtained, and the horizontal section of the energy dissipation element is mainly analyzed. The effects of parameters such as the ratio of length to span and its ratio to the linear stiffness of steel beams on the seismic performance of the joints were compared with those of traditional welded steel frame beam-column joints. The research results show that the joints can be fully assembled, the energy-consuming components can be replaced, and the beam-column connection joints can be controlled in practical applications. The deviation between the experimental results and the numerical simulation results is less than 10%, which is in good agreement. The failure mode of the node conforms to the seismic performance concept of “energy-dissipating elements are destroyed first and easily replaced after earthquakes”; when the ratio of the horizontal length to the span of the energy-consuming components is 0.225, and the ratio to the linear stiffness of the steel beam is 0.7, the seismic performance is close to or superior to that of traditional welded steel frame beam-column joints, that is, equal to or better than traditional welded steel frame beam-column joints.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuanqi Li & Binhui Huang, 2022. "Evaluation on Seismic Performance of Beam-Column Joints of Fabricated Steel Structure with Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3350-:d:769973
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3350/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/6/3350/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dawei Zhang & Yuanqi Li & Binhui Huang, 2023. "Investigation on Seismic Performance of the Fully Assembled Steel Frame Applying Beam-Column Joints with Replaceable Energy-Dissipating Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Yang Zhang & Wei Ma & Xin Li & Kai Li, 2022. "Experimental Research on Seismic Behavior of Haunched Concrete Beam–Column Joint Based on the Bolt Connection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-16, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:6:p:3350-:d:769973. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.