IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i5p2693-d758485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Vitro Screening of New Biological Limiters against Some of the Main Soil-Borne Phytopathogens

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni D’Ambrosio

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Plant Pathology Section), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Corrado Cariddi

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Plant Pathology Section), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Francesco Mannerucci

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Plant Pathology Section), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

  • Giovanni Luigi Bruno

    (Department of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences (Plant Pathology Section), University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70126 Bari, Italy)

Abstract

This study explored the role of Aphanocladium album (strain MX95), Pleurotus ostreatus (strain ALPO) and Pleurotus eryngii (strain AL142PE) as potential biological limiters. MX95, ALPO and AL142PE were screened under laboratory studies against Phytophthora nicotianae ( PN ), Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. radicis-lycopersici ( FORL ), Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici ( FOL ), Fusarium solani ( FS ), Sclerotinia minor ( SM ), Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ( SS ), Athelia ( Sclerotium ) rolfsii ( AR ) and Verticillium dahliae ( VD ). The radial growth inhibition and the over-growth of potential antagonists on the target organisms were used to assess the interactions in the in vitro dual culture plate assay. The antagonistic ability of each challenge isolate was evaluated by calculating an index of the antagonism (AI) based on the interaction type in the dual cultures. MX95, reducing the growth of SS (20%) and FS (40%), displayed deadlock at mycelial contact against FOL and FORL , deadlock at distance versus VD and completely over-grew PN and SM . ALPO reduced (43 to 88%) the mycelial growth of tested pathogens except FORL and replaced PN and VD . AL142PE reducing (53 to 67%) SS, VD , FS and FOL mycelial growth and completely over-grew PN. AR showed combative ability against all the experienced biological limiters. Based on the results of the AI values, MX95 (AI = 16.5) was considered an active antagonist, while ALPO (AI = 11.5) and AL142PE (AI = 12.0) were moderately active antagonists. Strains MX95, ALPO and AL142PE were suitable as environment-friendly potential biocontrol agents to manage some of the main soil-borne agents of foot, root, soft rot and wilt diseases. These results are the first step in the assessment of the potential capacity of these organisms as biological limiters. Nevertheless, additional experiments should be performed for the translation to the field conditions in plant protection against soil-borne plant pathogens. In particular, the optimisation of dose and application time validation should be performed for a solid conclusion about the competitive ability of MX95, ALPO and AL142PE and the usefulness of potential biological limiters.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni D’Ambrosio & Corrado Cariddi & Francesco Mannerucci & Giovanni Luigi Bruno, 2022. "In Vitro Screening of New Biological Limiters against Some of the Main Soil-Borne Phytopathogens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2693-:d:758485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2693/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/5/2693/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:2693-:d:758485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.