IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2240-d750654.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Design, Experimentation and Statistical Validation of a Methodology to Solve Complex Engineering Problems in Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Conrado Rosales-Torres

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
    Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Ex-Hacienda Santa Catarina Mártir, San Andrés Cholula 72810, Mexico)

  • Carlos Gijón-Rivera

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico)

  • Claudia Lizette Garay-Rondero

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
    Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico)

  • Álvaro Castillo-Paz

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico)

  • Gerardo Domínguez-Ramírez

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico)

Abstract

This article proposes a methodology that addresses the problem that many university professors often have with their students when facing complex engineering problems, causing frustration and desertion (abandonment of the problem to be solved). Although there are antecedents of works that emphasize the relevance of the realistic context in engineering problems and the importance of being structured in solving problems, we did not find measured effectiveness from the study of a group of students. This methodology focuses on engineering problems, in such a way that the decomposition of the problems in four steps responds to the solution process of the profiles of the analyzed subjects. The process followed in the preparation, implementation, validation, and reliability of this methodology is detailed. The experiment was designed to test both the effectiveness and reliability of the methodology. Four control groups for three different courses and periods were analyzed before and after the training of the four-step methodology. The observed factor was the variable score (0–100 points). The statistical analysis comprises descriptive statistics; Normality test for each population group; Paired t -Test/Wilcoxon test, and General linear model ANOVA (2 factors). The statistical analysis and tests show how the groups involved in the experiment obtained a significant benefit when the methodology for academic performance evaluations was applied.

Suggested Citation

  • Conrado Rosales-Torres & Carlos Gijón-Rivera & Claudia Lizette Garay-Rondero & Álvaro Castillo-Paz & Gerardo Domínguez-Ramírez, 2022. "Design, Experimentation and Statistical Validation of a Methodology to Solve Complex Engineering Problems in Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2240-:d:750654
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2240/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2240/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tiberiu Iancu & Valentina Constanta Tudor & Eduard Alexandru Dumitru & Cristina Maria Sterie & Marius Mihai Micu & Dragos Smedescu & Liviu Marcuta & Elena Tonea & Paula Stoicea & Catalin Vintu & Andy , 2022. "A Scientometric Analysis of Climate Change Adaptation Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2240-:d:750654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.