IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i4p2131-d748376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Direct and Indirect Effects of Social Support and School Social Capital on the Academic Success of 11–19-Year-Old Students Using Distance Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Brigita Mieziene

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Arunas Emeljanovas

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Roma Jusiene

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Rima Breidokiene

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Sigita Girdzijauskiene

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Stanislav Sabaliauskas

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Jolita Buzaityte-Kasalyniene

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Virginija Budiene

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Indre Eiliakaite

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Erika Speicyte-Ruschhoff

    (Faculty of Philosophy, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Edita Babkovskiene

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Dainius Zvirdauskas

    (Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Ichiro Kawachi

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

In the context of current changes in the education process due to the pandemic, the main aims of this study were to highlight social capital factors within the school community that are associated with better students’ outcomes in the context of distance learning. This study was a cross-sectional population-based study. The research sample consisted of 1483 students, whose ages varied from 11 to 19 years old (56.9% were girls). Academic success in this study was measured in terms of average grade and students’ perception of their learning process or outcomes by six single items. A Five-item WHO-5 questionnaire was used to measure students’ psychological well-being. Social capital was measured in terms of relationship, trust, reciprocity, and communication within different social contexts in the school community in total by 16 items. School social capital and social support scales were developed from these items. Students’ gender and age were also taken into consideration. The research results show that although social capital from parents and peers also matters, the relationship with teachers emerges as the main and the most important resource in supporting positive attitudes and outcomes in to learning (std.β varied from 0.116 to 0.439). The results also show that higher psychological wellbeing is associated with higher perceived school social capital (std.β 0.260) and social support (std.β 0.326) and mediates the effects of the latter two for better academic success outcomes. The findings also highlight the importance of close and trusting social ties, especially between students and their teachers as well as parents for better learning outcomes in times of crises and in the context of distance learning. The study results prove that social support and social capital at school are essential factors for sustainable psychological development. The results presumably support the idea that the school is sustainable if it is developing as an ecosystem not solely aimed at academic outcomes. The results of the current study may aid policymakers and practitioners in developing interventions, policies and practices that focus resources where they will have the greatest benefit.

Suggested Citation

  • Brigita Mieziene & Arunas Emeljanovas & Roma Jusiene & Rima Breidokiene & Sigita Girdzijauskiene & Stanislav Sabaliauskas & Jolita Buzaityte-Kasalyniene & Virginija Budiene & Indre Eiliakaite & Erika , 2022. "Direct and Indirect Effects of Social Support and School Social Capital on the Academic Success of 11–19-Year-Old Students Using Distance Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-14, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2131-:d:748376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2131/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/4/2131/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grewenig, Elisabeth & Lergetporer, Philipp & Werner, Katharina & Woessmann, Ludger & Zierow, Larissa, 2021. "COVID-19 and educational inequality: How school closures affect low- and high-achieving students," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Andrew Eyles & Stephen Gibbons & Piero Montebruno, 2020. "Covid-19 school shutdowns: what will they do to our children's education?," CEP Covid-19 Analyses cepcovid-19-001, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    3. Thea Toft Amholt & Jesper Dammeyer & Rhonwyn Carter & Janni Niclasen, 2020. "Psychological Well-Being and Academic Achievement among School-Aged Children: a Systematic Review," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 13(5), pages 1523-1548, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stephanie Lange & Claire-Marie Altrock & Emily Gossmann & Jörg M. Fegert & Andreas Jud, 2022. "COVID-19—What Price Do Children Pay? An Analysis of Economic and Social Policy Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Borisova, Ekaterina & Gründler, Klaus & Hackenberger, Armin & Harter, Anina & Potrafke, Niklas & Schoors, Koen, 2023. "Crisis experience and the deep roots of COVID-19 vaccination preferences," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    3. Svaleryd, Helena & Vlachos, Jonas, 2022. "COVID-19 and School Closures," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1008, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    4. Tim Klausmann, 2021. "Feedback in Homogeneous Ability Groups: A Field Experiment," Working Papers 2114, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz.
    5. Roman, Monica & Plopeanu, Aurelian-Petruș, 2021. "The effectiveness of the emergency eLearning during COVID-19 pandemic. The case of higher education in economics in Romania," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    6. Titan Alon & Sena Coskun & Matthias Doepke & David Koll & Michèle Tertilt, 2022. "From Mancession to Shecession: Women’s Employment in Regular and Pandemic Recessions," NBER Macroeconomics Annual, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(1), pages 83-151.
    7. Szabó, Andrea & Fekete, Mariann & Böcskei, Balázs & Nagy, Ádám, 2023. "Real-time experiences of Hungarian youth in digital education as an example of the impact of pandemia. “I’ve never had better grades on average: I got straight all the time”," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Lee Elliot Major & Stephen Machin, 2020. "Covid-19 and social mobility," CentrePiece - The magazine for economic performance 583, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    9. Mathias Huebener & Sevrin Waights & C. Katharina Spiess & Nico A. Siegel & Gert G. Wagner, 2021. "Parental well-being in times of Covid-19 in Germany," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 91-122, March.
    10. Gustavo A. Marrero & Juan C. Palomino & Gabriela Sicilia, 2022. "Inequality of Opportunity in Educational Achievement in Western Europe: contributors and channels," Working Papers 612, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    11. Stefanie Stantcheva, 2022. "Inequalities in the times of a pandemic," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 37(109), pages 5-41.
    12. Ludger Wößmann & Vera Freundl & Elisabeth Grewenig & Philipp Lergetporer & Katharina Werner & Larissa Zierow, 2021. "Education on Lockdown Again: How Did Schoolchildren Spend Their Time during the Early 2021 School Closures?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(05), pages 36-52, May.
    13. Sabine Zinn & Michael Bayer, 2021. "Time Spent on School-Related Activities at Home during the Pandemic: A Longitudinal Analysis of Social Group Inequality among Secondary School Students," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 1132, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    14. Kozhaya, Mireille, 2022. "The double burden: The impact of school closures on labor force participation of mothers," Ruhr Economic Papers 956, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    15. Spyros Themelis & Angela Tuck, 2022. "Educational Inclusion of Vulnerable Children and Young People After Covid‐19," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(2), pages 156-159.
    16. Camilo Herrera & Javier Torres-Vallejos & Jonathan Martínez-Líbano & Andrés Rubio & Cristian Céspedes & Juan Carlos Oyanedel & Eduardo Acuña & Danae Pedraza, 2022. "Perceived Collective School Efficacy Mediates the Organizational Justice Effect in Teachers’ Subjective Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-10, September.
    17. Hideo Akabayashi & Shimpei Taguchi & Mirka Zvedelikova, 2021. "Access to and Demand for Online School Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2021-013, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
    18. Carlana, Michela & La Ferrara, Eliana, 2021. "Apart but Connected: Online Tutoring and Student Outcomes during the COVID-19 Pandemic," CEPR Discussion Papers 15761, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Piero Montebruno, 2020. "Disrupted schooling: impacts on achievement from the Chilean school occupations," CEP Discussion Papers dp1696, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    20. Eberle, Mira & Oberrauch, Luis, 2023. "What a difference three years of economics education make: Evidence from lower stream schools in Germany," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:4:p:2131-:d:748376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.