IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p745-d721716.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Optimal Strategy of China’s Plastic Drinking Straws Ban Based on Consumer Heterogeneity and Retailer Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Wenhuan Wang

    (School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China
    Zhejiang Center of Public Opinion and Research, Zhejiang University of Technonlogy, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Jianping Wei

    (School of Public Administration, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

  • Dan Wu

    (School of Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, China)

Abstract

The Chinese government has issued a new “Plastic Restriction Ban” requiring that, by the end of 2020, the food and beverage industry across the country bans the use of single-use, nondegradable plastic drinking straws. The governance of plastic drinking straws is a multi-dimensional and complex process. Therefore, based on the heterogeneity of consumers, this paper constructs a tripartite game model (the government, retailers, and consumers) for the governance of plastic drinking straws in China. Under this model, this research derives an optimal strategy in both monopoly and competitive markets, assuming the government has access to two policy tools, fines and subsidies. The research results suggest the following. (1) In monopoly markets, when (a) the fine or subsidy fee is high or (b) the fine or subsidy fee is low and the number of environment-conscious consumers is high, retailers are more inclined to provide biodegradable drinking straws. (2) Consumer heterogeneity has a certain impact on policy results; when there are enough environment-conscious consumers, policy costs can be reduced. (3) For high-quality products, the policy costs in competitive markets is lower than in monopoly markets; for low-quality products, the policy costs in competitive markets is higher than in monopoly markets. Based on the conclusions, this work suggests the government should focus on cultivating consumers’ environmental awareness and tighter control of products quality, in addition to the two policy tools, i.e., fines and subsidies, because these can reduce policy costs. Consumers should be aware of their own importance to China’s Plastic Drinking Straws Ban and adopt a refusal to accept plastic drinking straws and reduce the consumption of disposable plastics to support the policy. Retailers should also realize that proactively catering to consumer and government expectations can bring higher benefits to themselves; this can be achieved by providing high-quality biodegradable straws to support China’s Plastic Drinking Straws Ban . The model of this work could be applied to other corporate activities related to sustainability, such as plastic bags, plastic bottles, etc., and their connection to government policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenhuan Wang & Jianping Wei & Dan Wu, 2022. "The Optimal Strategy of China’s Plastic Drinking Straws Ban Based on Consumer Heterogeneity and Retailer Competition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:745-:d:721716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/745/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/745/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zvanaka S. Mazhandu & Edison Muzenda & Tirivaviri A. Mamvura & Mohamed Belaid & Trust Nhubu, 2020. "Integrated and Consolidated Review of Plastic Waste Management and Bio-Based Biodegradable Plastics: Challenges and Opportunities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-57, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Minglin Jiang & Xiaowei Lin & Xideng Zhou & Hongfang Qiao, 2022. "Research on Supply Chain Quality Decision Model Considering Reference Effect and Competition under Different Decision-Making Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Choi, Hong Il & Sung, Young Joon & Hong, Min Eui & Han, Jonghee & Min, Byoung Koun & Sim, Sang Jun, 2022. "Reconsidering the potential of direct microalgal biomass utilization as end-products: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Andrea Winterstetter & Marie Grodent & Venkatesh Kini & Kim Ragaert & Karl C. Vrancken, 2021. "A Review of Technological Solutions to Prevent or Reduce Marine Plastic Litter in Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Giovanni Gadaleta & Sabino De Gisi & Francesco Todaro & Michele Notarnicola, 2022. "Carbon Footprint and Total Cost Evaluation of Different Bio-Plastics Waste Treatment Strategies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, June.
    4. Rahaf Ajaj & Wisam Abu Jadayil & Hamna Anver & Eman Aqil, 2022. "A Revision for the Different Reuses of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Water Bottles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-14, April.
    5. Ciara O’Dwyer & Atiq Zaman & Jessica K. Breadsell, 2022. "The Uptake of Container Deposit Schemes: A Case Study in Perth, Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Adeleye Ayoade Adeniran & Winston Shakantu, 2022. "The Health and Environmental Impact of Plastic Waste Disposal in South African Townships: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:745-:d:721716. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.