IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i2p604-d718901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bibliometric Analysis of Highly Cited Papers on Resources and the Environment in China

Author

Listed:
  • Guosheng Han

    (School of Business, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rundong Luo

    (School of Business, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kaiyue Sa

    (School of Finance, Shandong Technology and Business University, Yantai 264005, China)

  • Min Zhuang

    (School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Hui Li

    (School of Economics and Management, Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai 264209, China)

Abstract

To review the current state of resources and environmental sciences in China, this study assessed highly cited papers of five leading CSSCI journals sourced from the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure database. The fields of resources and environmental sciences were the research focus, and the bibliometric analysis software CiteSpace was used to perform co-occurrence analysis on keywords, authors, and research institutions based on bibliometrics and social network analysis. Furthermore, the research hotspots, scientist groups, and main cooperation models in the field of resources and environmental sciences in China were also explored. The results show that: (1) For 30 years, the interdisciplinarity of resources and environmental sciences has become more and more intense, and research themes have become increasingly extensive. The research hotspots of highly cited papers focused on energy, ecology, land, water resources, and sustainable development. In recent years, problems associated with energy and carbon emissions have aroused great interest. The ecological and sustainable development of resources and environmental elements has emerged as a future research trend. (2) An analysis of scientist-oriented networks shows that highly cited papers are mostly published by group authors. Scientists work closely within their respective academic groups, while intergroup academic cooperation is rare. Furthermore, connectedness between cooperation networks is poor, and scientists are largely connected through their research institutions. Cooperation among scientists is greatly affected by their geographical locations. Research institutions in the same region are more likely to cooperate. Beijing and Nanjing are high-producing areas of highly cited papers. The Institute of Geographic Sciences and Resources, CAS, is the most influential research institution. This paper introduces the state-of-the-art research hotspots of Chinese resources and environmental sciences to international academic circles and provides a basis for the research practice of resources and environmental sciences worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Guosheng Han & Rundong Luo & Kaiyue Sa & Min Zhuang & Hui Li, 2022. "Bibliometric Analysis of Highly Cited Papers on Resources and the Environment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:604-:d:718901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/604/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/2/604/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chenjia Zhang & Yiping Fang & Xiujuan Chen & Tian Congshan, 2019. "Bibliometric Analysis of Trends in Global Sustainable Livelihood Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-28, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingyang Nan & Jun Chen, 2022. "Research Progress, Hotspots and Trends of Land Use under the Background of Ecological Civilization in China: Visual Analysis Based on the CNKI Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Ching-Yi Chang & Hui-Chun Chu, 2022. "Mapping Digital Storytelling in Interactive Learning Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Miani, Abdul Matin & Hamayoun, Habibullah & Hemat, Mahmood, 2022. "Qualitative Analysis of Strategies Affecting Sustainable Livelihoods in the Northern Villages of Andar District, Gazni Province, Afghanistan," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 10(2), April.
    2. Fan Zeng & Stacy Hyun Nam Lee & Chris Kwan Yu Lo, 2020. "The Role of Information Systems in the Sustainable Development of Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-29, April.
    3. Xue Wei & Chen Liang & Wenhui Chen, 2022. "Exploring Current Status and Evolutionary Trends on the Paid Use of State-Owned Forest Resources in China: A Bibliometric Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-23, May.
    4. Goli, Imaneh & Azadi, Hossein & Najafabadi, Maryam Omidi & Lashgarara, Farhad & Viira, Ants-Hannes & Kurban, Alishir & Sklenička, Petr & Janečková, Kristina & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Are adaptation strategies to climate change gender neutral? Lessons learned from paddy farmers in Northern Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Fernando Zambrano Farias & María del Carmen Valls Martínez & Pedro Antonio Martín-Cervantes, 2021. "Explanatory Factors of Business Failure: Literature Review and Global Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Dipanwita De & Chandan Surabhi Das, 2021. "Measuring Livelihood Sustainability by PCA in Indian Sundarban," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(12), pages 18424-18442, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:2:p:604-:d:718901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.