IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15926-d988141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Interdependencies of Infrastructure Critical Systems during Earthquake Event: A Case Study for Padang City

Author

Listed:
  • Fuad Dellany Shubandrio

    (School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Ahmad Mohamad El-Maissi

    (School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Moustafa Moufid Kassem

    (School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Masrilayanti Masrilayanti

    (Civil Engineering Department, Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Universitas Andalas, Pauh, Padang 25163, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia)

  • Siti Rahyla Rahmat

    (School of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Fadzli Mohamed Nazri

    (School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Nibong Tebal 14300, Penang, Malaysia)

Abstract

Our modern society is becoming increasingly reliant on transportation networks, as well as the interdependent infrastructures and technologies that interact with them. The increasing complexity and interconnectedness of infrastructure networks make them susceptible to impact not only directly from external shocks but also indirectly from the failure of dependent infrastructures. This research study was conducted in Padang city, one of the most disaster-prone areas in Indonesia. Based on the literature review, it is no doubt that research study on seismic risk assessment is insufficient and outdated. In fact, a study about the interdependency between Critical Infrastructures (CIs) is yet to be done in this region. In this study, there are two approaches used for data gathering which is by surveying existing CIs using Google Earth and by an online questionnaire survey via Google Form. Based on the qualitative survey, a functionality rating method is done to obtain the level of outage/loss functionality which is an indicator for the damage occurred to the structure and infrastructure. Following that, a seismic risk analysis was conducted to assess the interdependency between investigated CIs and facilities. Respondents’ judgement from the questionnaire were used to identify the base criticality of each critical infrastructure. Based on the qualitative survey, the level of loss in functionality for the substation and the telecommunication tower is rated as “High”, but the loss in functionality for the water supply system is rated as “Moderate”. Moreover, the findings used from the respondents’ judgements were used to establish the initial level of criticality for each vital infrastructure. According to the findings, hospitals, power substations, and communication towers all have a criticality level of “5-Vital”, while police stations and fire stations both have a “3-medium” criticality rating. Eventually, the results of this assessment of interdependence are displayed in a criticality map, which shows how the interdependency relationship affects the initial criticality of a certain upstream infrastructure. Understanding the potential consequences of infrastructure failure, especially in regard to dependent infrastructures, can help emergency response teams formulate more targeted strategies for managing risks. As a consequence of this, the resilience of the wider community is improved, which contributes toward the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 11: Sustainable cities and communities particularly in reducing disasters and people in vulnerable situation.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuad Dellany Shubandrio & Ahmad Mohamad El-Maissi & Moustafa Moufid Kassem & Masrilayanti Masrilayanti & Siti Rahyla Rahmat & Fadzli Mohamed Nazri, 2022. "Evaluating the Interdependencies of Infrastructure Critical Systems during Earthquake Event: A Case Study for Padang City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-27, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15926-:d:988141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15926/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15926/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sun, Li & D'Ayala, Dina & Fayjaloun, Rosemary & Gehl, Pierre, 2021. "Agent-based model on resilience-oriented rapid responses of road networks under seismic hazard," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Hongping & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2022. "Resilience-oriented optimal post-disruption reconfiguration for coupled traffic-power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Wang, Jie & Zhang, Yangyi & Li, Shunlong & Xu, Wencheng & Jin, Yao, 2024. "Directed network-based connectivity probability evaluation for urban bridges," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Zhao, Taiyi & Tang, Yuchun & Li, Qiming & Wang, Jingquan, 2023. "Resilience-oriented network reconfiguration strategies for community emergency medical services," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Taghizadeh, Mehdi & Mahsuli, Mojtaba & Poorzahedy, Hossain, 2023. "Probabilistic framework for evaluating the seismic resilience of transportation systems during emergency medical response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    5. Tong Wang & Yang Liu & Qiyuan Li & Peng Du & Xiaogong Zheng & Qingfei Gao, 2023. "State-of-the-Art Review of the Resilience of Urban Bridge Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Kim, Gibeom & Heo, Gyunyoung, 2023. "Agent-based radiological emergency evacuation simulation modeling considering mitigation infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Liu, Qiang & Tang, Aiping & Huang, Delong & Huang, Ziyuan & Zhang, Bin & Xu, Xiuchen, 2022. "Total probabilistic measure for the potential risk of regional roads exposed to landslides," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    8. Yin, Jiateng & Ren, Xianliang & Liu, Ronghui & Tang, Tao & Su, Shuai, 2022. "Quantitative analysis for resilience-based urban rail systems: A hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    9. Wang, Nanxi & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Resilience assessment of waterway transportation systems: Combining system performance and recovery cost," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15926-:d:988141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.