IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15862-d987173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding EU Fisheries Management Dynamics by Engaging Stakeholders through Online Group Model-Building

Author

Listed:
  • Erda Gercek

    (Graduate School of Business, Koç University, Istanbul 34450, Turkey)

  • Monica Gambino

    (NISEA, Fishery and Aquaculture Economic Research, 84100 Salerno, Italy)

  • Loretta Malvarosa

    (NISEA, Fishery and Aquaculture Economic Research, 84100 Salerno, Italy)

Abstract

The Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) has a challenging mandate to find the right policy mix to simultaneously achieve all three aspects of sustainability: economic, social, and environmental. But development and implementation of an effective and sustainable fisheries management policy has been a challenge all over the world. The evidence of this failure is found in the continuous decline in fish stocks. Faced with the difficulty in fulfilling this mandate, the European Commission has increasingly been embracing fisheries stakeholders’ involvement. Stakeholder involvement in policy development and implementation is important because it tries to bring the relevant interested parties together, understanding and paying attention to what is important to each and every stakeholder, identifying the individual and common issues. This process in turn can foster connections, trust, confidence, and buy-in, and commitment for the implementation of the policy. This research describes a group model-building (GMB) approach using system dynamic methodology as a participatory model building tool, enabling stakeholders to become deeply involved in the identification and modelling of the complex issues faced by the EU fisheries. Given the geographical diversity of the stakeholders, GMB was applied online, both synchronously and asynchronously, providing participants time to carefully reflect on key variables, their relationships, and the behaviour of the overall system. The study demonstrated the need and relevance of an adequate engagement of the stakeholders, with online stakeholder consultation proving an effective method of engagement. Hence, the study is very relevant for both scientists and managers. The GMB process meant the final model evolved significantly from the initial one offered, which pointed to active involvement in and progressive learning from the modelling process itself, as the methodology argues. Two quantitative stock-flow models using actual numbers were built not only to aid the GMB process but to depict how all three aspects of sustainability could actually be met with the right set of policies that consider feedback loops and inherent trade-offs.

Suggested Citation

  • Erda Gercek & Monica Gambino & Loretta Malvarosa, 2022. "Understanding EU Fisheries Management Dynamics by Engaging Stakeholders through Online Group Model-Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15862-:d:987173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15862/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15862/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward J. Garrity, 2011. "System Dynamics Modeling of Individual Transferable Quota Fisheries and Suggestions for Rebuilding Stocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-32, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andres Camilo Castaño-Barreto & Carlos Alberto Jaramillo-Cruz & Raul Andres Molina Benavides & Alberto Stanislao Atzori, 2020. "Scenarios of Sustainable Fishing in the Zapatosa Marsh (Colombia) Simulated with a System Dynamics Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15862-:d:987173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.