IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i23p15676-d983672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Innovation of Mobile Pedagogy from the Teacher’s Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Zhang

    (School of Foreign Languages, North Minzu University, Yinchuan 750021, China)

  • Sunze Yu

    (Business School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia)

Abstract

This paper focuses on the use of mobile technology to assist teaching and learning in distance education. It aims to investigate teaching behaviour in mobile pedagogy and examine the impact of technology on current education. A case study was conducted through semi-structured interviews with a cohort of 30 Chinese lecturers who taught English through online tutoring. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data and the assessment was based on teacher perceptions of mobile pedagogy. The impact of technology on the current educational environment is discussed through an analysis of mobile pedagogy and teacher perceptions. The findings show that mobile pedagogy is highly regional in practice and nature and features in-country software applications and social communication tools. Despite the attributes of connectivity and flexibility, mobile pedagogy only disrupted traditional teaching methods, leading to minimal changes to the education system. This study provides recommendations for the sustainable development of mobile pedagogy for future education systems in the digital age.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Zhang & Sunze Yu, 2022. "Assessing the Innovation of Mobile Pedagogy from the Teacher’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15676-:d:983672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15676/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15676/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tong, Tingting & Li, Haizheng, 2018. "Demand for MOOC - An Application of Big Data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 194-207.
    2. Husain Coovadia & Christo Ackermann, 2021. "Integrating digital pedagogies into a typical student learning lifecycle and its effect on exam performance," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 42-62, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dlzar Al Kez & Christopher Lowans & Aoife Foley, 2024. "Sustainable Development in Third Level Programs: Distilling a Pathway to a True Net-Zero Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-34, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M., 2022. "Accounting education literature review (2021)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    2. Meredith Tharapos & Konrad Peszynski & Kwok Hung Lau & Margaret Heffernan & Gillian Vesty & Aida Ghalebeigi, 2023. "Effective teaching, student engagement and student satisfaction during the Covid‐19 pandemic: Evidence from business students' qualitative survey evaluations," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 3173-3192, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:23:p:15676-:d:983672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.