IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14846-d968828.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

First Report of Field Efficacy and Economic Viability of Metarhizium anisopliae -ICIPE 20 for Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Management on Tomato

Author

Listed:
  • Fred Peter Kabaale

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya
    Department of AgricultureProduction, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo P.O. Box 1, Uganda
    National Teachers’ College, Kaliro P.O. Box 65, Uganda)

  • Venansio Tumuhaise

    (Department of AgricultureProduction, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo P.O. Box 1, Uganda)

  • William Tinzaara

    (Department of AgricultureProduction, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyambogo University, Kyambogo P.O. Box 1, Uganda)

  • Geoffrey Turyasingura

    (Department of Crop Production and Management, Faculty of Agriculture and Animal Sciences, Busitema University, Arapai Campus, Soroti P.O. Box 203, Uganda)

  • Sevgan Subramanian

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya)

  • Fathiya Mbarak Khamis

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya)

  • Komivi Senyo Akutse

    (International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology ( icipe ), Nairobi P.O. Box 30772-00100, Kenya)

Abstract

Eco-friendly pest control options are highly needed in food crop production systems to mitigate the hazards of synthetic chemical pesticides. Entomopathogenic fungal biopesticides— Metarhizium anisopliae strains ICIPE 20 (oil-formulation containing 1.0 × 10 9 conidia/mL) and ICIPE 69 (commercialized biopesticide known as Mazao Campaign ® )—were evaluated against Tuta absoluta on tomato through inundative foliar spray and compared with the commonly used pesticide Dudu Acelamectin 5% EC (Abamectin 20 g/L + Acetamiprid 3%) and untreated plot. All the treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with three replicates. The field experiments were conducted for two consecutive cropping seasons in Mukono district, Uganda. Tuta absoluta infestation, injury severity on leaves and fruits, fruit yield loss, marketable fruit yield gain and cost–benefit ratio of the treatments were assessed. The results during both seasons showed a significant lower fruit yield loss in M. anisopliae ICIPE 20-treated plots compared to untreated plots, with a marketable fruit yield gain exceeding 22% and a cost–benefit ratio greater than 2.8 (BCR~3). Dudu Acelamectin 5% EC outperformed all the other treatments, but needs to be considered with caution due to its non-target effect and resistance development, whereas M. anisopliae ICIPE 69 performed the least well. In addition, the findings showed the high degree of efficacy and economic viability of these biopesticides as a potential T. absoluta control option in the field. However, it is important to further explore different formulations of these eco-friendly biopesticides, inoculum delivery approach, application frequency, their effectiveness in different agro-ecological zones and compatibility with commonly used pesticides in tomato production systems for sustainable management of T. absoluta .

Suggested Citation

  • Fred Peter Kabaale & Venansio Tumuhaise & William Tinzaara & Geoffrey Turyasingura & Sevgan Subramanian & Fathiya Mbarak Khamis & Komivi Senyo Akutse, 2022. "First Report of Field Efficacy and Economic Viability of Metarhizium anisopliae -ICIPE 20 for Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) Management on Tomato," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14846-:d:968828
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14846/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14846/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14846-:d:968828. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.