IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i17p10816-d901888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Social Quality of Design-Build: Lessons Learnt from Higher Education

Author

Listed:
  • Franziska Schreiber

    (Institute for Urban Planning and Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany
    Bauhaus Earth, 12107 Berlin, Germany)

  • Johannes Nöldeke

    (Institute for Social Sciences, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Špela Setzen

    (Institute of Spatial Conceptions and Fundamentals of Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Cordula Kropp

    (Institute for Social Sciences, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Astrid Ley

    (Institute for Urban Planning and Design, University of Stuttgart, 70174 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

The need for a systemic transformation of the building sector is increasingly recognized, but much of the current discussion and actions focus on the creation of technical innovation, while the question of how to improve the social quality of buildings and building processes is largely ignored. Socially engaged architecture more broadly and design-build projects in particular represent an exception in this regard. Design-build studios have emerged as a new teaching method at numerous universities in North America, Europe and elsewhere to equip students with the skills needed to address pressing sustainability issues. Most design-build projects include an explicit claim to social relevance and change and opt for a co-productive process. However, the extent to which such practices have the potential to enhance the social (and, ultimately, the ecological) sustainability of buildings and construction processes has been insufficiently assessed. Based on a comparative analysis of five design-build projects carried out at the University of Stuttgart, this paper discusses critical factors that influence both the (social) quality of the design-build process as well as its (built) outcome and impact. The findings offer important insights for future design-build projects and their underlying need for revised training and teaching curricula to equip future architects and planners with the necessary knowledge and skills to act as process designers and facilitators and to shape a more people-centered built environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Franziska Schreiber & Johannes Nöldeke & Špela Setzen & Cordula Kropp & Astrid Ley, 2022. "The Social Quality of Design-Build: Lessons Learnt from Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10816-:d:901888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10816/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/17/10816/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monika Grubbauer, 2017. "In search of authenticity," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 789-799, November.
    2. Camilo Calderon, 2020. "Unearthing the political: differences, conflicts and power in participatory urban design," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 50-64, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:17:p:10816-:d:901888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.