IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10315-d892286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of a Proposed Set of Indicators for Assessing Food Company Commitments and Practices Regarding Environmental Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Mackay

    (School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Ana Renker-Darby

    (School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Ella Robinson

    (Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong 3550, Australia)

  • Grace Shaw

    (School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand)

  • Gary Sacks

    (Global Obesity Centre, Deakin University, Geelong 3550, Australia)

Abstract

There is widespread recognition that a transformation of food systems is needed to improve environmental sustainability. As part of efforts to hold food companies accountable for their role in improving the environmental sustainability of food systems, there is a critical role for monitoring and benchmarking of company actions. This study aimed to develop a proposed set of metrics for assessing the commitments and practices of food companies regarding environmental sustainability. Guided by an inventory of existing sustainability reporting frameworks and benchmarking initiatives, we proposed 37 indicators for assessment, categorised into ten domains, covering strategy, packaging, greenhouse gas emissions, energy use, water, biodiversity, food waste, compliance and reducing animal-sourced foods. We refined the indicators after consultation with academic experts. We discussed implementation feasibility with sustainability managers from three major food companies in New Zealand. Feedback highlighted the need to pilot test methods for applying the indicators in practice, including assessment of a company’s impact across the supply chain, refining indicator scoring criteria, and weighting indicators based on company- and sector-specific priority areas of focus. Assessment of food companies using the proposed set of metrics can improve accountability for action and inform government regulatory responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Mackay & Ana Renker-Darby & Ella Robinson & Grace Shaw & Gary Sacks, 2022. "Development of a Proposed Set of Indicators for Assessing Food Company Commitments and Practices Regarding Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-24, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10315-:d:892286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10315/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10315/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Cantele & Thomas A. Tsalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2018. "A New Framework for Assessing the Sustainability Reporting Disclosure of Water Utilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.
    2. Apurva Kasture & Stefanie Vandevijvere & Ella Robinson & Gary Sacks & Boyd Swinburn, 2019. "Benchmarking the commitments related to population nutrition and obesity prevention of major food companies in New Zealand," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(8), pages 1147-1157, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Chengyun & Su, Kun & Zhang, Miaomiao, 2021. "Water disclosure and financial reporting quality for social changes: Empirical evidence from China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    2. Tsalis, Thomas A. & Nikolaou, Ioannis E. & Konstantakopoulou, Fotini & Zhang, Ying & Evangelinos, Konstantinos I., 2020. "Evaluating the corporate environmental profile by analyzing corporate social responsibility reports," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 63-75.
    3. Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum & Amin Chegenizadeh & Ain Hajawiyah & Sriningsih Sriningsih & Sri Utami & Mochamad Arief Budihardjo & Hamid Nikraz, 2023. "Determinants of Corporate Water Disclosure in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Nikolaos S. Trevlopoulos & Thomas A. Tsalis & Konstantinos I. Evangelinos & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Konstantinos I. Vatalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2021. "The influence of environmental regulations on business innovation, intellectual capital, environmental and economic performance," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 163-178, March.
    6. Miseldra Gil-Marín & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Sandra Vera-Ruiz & Analia Verónica Losada, 2022. "Sustainability Accounting Studies: A Metasynthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Lara Tarquinio & Domenico Raucci & Roberto Benedetti, 2018. "An Investigation of Global Reporting Initiative Performance Indicators in Corporate Sustainability Reports: Greek, Italian and Spanish Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-19, March.
    8. Susie Ruqun Wu & Changliang Shao & Jiquan Chen, 2018. "Approaches on the Screening Methods for Materiality in Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    9. I Gusti Ayu Diah Dhyanasaridewi & Etty Murwaningsari, 2021. "The Effect of Sustainability Report Disclosure and Innovations on Earnings Informativeness With Environmental Performance as Moderating," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 11(1), pages 29-37.
    10. Venturelli, Andrea & Ligorio, Lorenzo & de Nuccio, Elbano, 2023. "Biodiversity accountability in water utilities: A case study," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Jintao Lu & Licheng Ren & Siqin Yao & Jiayuan Qiao & Wadim Strielkowski & Justas Streimikis, 2019. "Comparative Review of Corporate Social Responsibility of Energy Utilities and Sustainable Energy Development Trends in the Baltic States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.
    13. Tskhai, Аleksandr, 2020. "Model for evaluating the efficiency of Russian water utilities," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Thomas A. Tsalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2020. "A benchmarking–scoring methodology for assessing the water risk disclosures of water utilities," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6473-6493, October.
    15. Agnieszka Janik & Adam Ryszko & Marek Szafraniec, 2020. "Greenhouse Gases and Circular Economy Issues in Sustainability Reports from the Energy Sector in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-36, November.
    16. Sabrina Spallini & Virginia Milone & Antonio Nisio & Patrizia Romanazzi, 2021. "The Dimension of Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Broadness of Information in Italian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-22, January.
    17. A. Sardi & E. Sorano, 2021. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Papers 2102.04090, arXiv.org.
    18. Gary Sacks & Ella Robinson & Adrian J. Cameron & Lana Vanderlee & Stefanie Vandevijvere & Boyd Swinburn, 2020. "Benchmarking the Nutrition-Related Policies and Commitments of Major Food Companies in Australia, 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
    19. Mio, Chiara & Fasan, Marco & Scarpa, Francesco, 2023. "Materiality investor perspectives on utilities’ ESG performance. An empirical analysis of ESG factors and cost of equity," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Alexander Bergmann & Peter Posch, 2018. "Mandatory Sustainability Reporting in Germany: Does Size Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10315-:d:892286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.