IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10010-d887000.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An AI-Based Automatic Risks Detection Solution for Plant Owner’s Technical Requirements in Equipment Purchase Order

Author

Listed:
  • Chae-Yeon Kim

    (Graduate Institute of Ferrous and Energy Materials Technology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea)

  • Jong-Gwan Jeong

    (Graduate Institute of Ferrous and Energy Materials Technology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea
    Plate Rolling Maintenance Section, Plate Rolling Department, Pohang Iron and Steel Company (POSCO), Pohang 37754, Korea)

  • So-Won Choi

    (Graduate Institute of Ferrous and Energy Materials Technology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea)

  • Eul-Bum Lee

    (Graduate Institute of Ferrous and Energy Materials Technology, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea
    Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 37673, Korea)

Abstract

Maintenance activities to replace, repair, and revamp equipment in the industrial plant sector are gradually needed for sustainability during the plant’s life cycle. In order to carry out these revamping activities, the plant owners exchange many purchase orders (POs) with equipment suppliers, including technical and specification documents and commercial procurement content. As POs are written in various formats with large volumes and complexities, it is often time-consuming for the owner’s engineer to review them and it may lead to errors and omissions. This study proposed the purchase order recognition and analysis system (PORAS), which automatically detects and compares risk clauses between plant owners’ and suppliers’ POs by utilizing artificial intelligence (AI). The PORAS is a comprehensive framework consisting of two independent modules and four model components that accurately reflect on the added value of the PORAS. The table recognition and comparison (TRC) module is utilized for risk clauses in POs written in tables with its two components, the table comparison (TRC-C) and table recognition (TRC-R) models. The critical terms in general conditions (CTGC) module analyzes the patterns of risk clauses in general texts, then extracts them with a rule-based algorithm and compares them through entity matching. In the TRC-C model using machine learning (Ditto model), a few errors occurred due to insufficient training data, resulting in an accuracy of 87.8%, whereas in the TRC-R model, a rule-based algorithm, errors occurred in only some exceptional cases; thus, its F1 score was evaluated to be 96.9%. The CTGC module’s F2 score for automatic extraction performance was evaluated as 79.1% due to some data’s bias. Overall, the validation study shows that while a human review of the risk clauses in a PO manually took hours, it took only an average of 10 min with the PORAS. Therefore, this time saving can significantly reduce the owner engineer’s PO workload. In essence, this study contributes to achieving sustainable engineering processes through the intelligence and automation of document and risk management in the plant industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Chae-Yeon Kim & Jong-Gwan Jeong & So-Won Choi & Eul-Bum Lee, 2022. "An AI-Based Automatic Risks Detection Solution for Plant Owner’s Technical Requirements in Equipment Purchase Order," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10010-:d:887000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10010/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10010/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Shao & Guodong Yang & Xuefeng Niu & Xuqing Zhang & Fulei Zhan & Tianqi Tang, 2014. "Information Extraction of High-Resolution Remotely Sensed Image Based on Multiresolution Segmentation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-11, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10010-:d:887000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.