IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i15p9086-d870898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tools and Technologies for Sustainable Territorial Development in the Context of a Quadruple Innovation Helix

Author

Listed:
  • Danila Parygin

    (Department of Digital Technologies for Urban Studies, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Volgograd State Technical University, 1 Akademicheskaya Str., Volgograd 400074, Russia)

  • Natalia Sadovnikova

    (Department of Digital Technologies for Urban Studies, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Volgograd State Technical University, 1 Akademicheskaya Str., Volgograd 400074, Russia)

  • Leyla Gamidullaeva

    (Department of Marketing, Commerce and Services, Penza State University, 40, Krasnaya Str., Penza 440026, Russia)

  • Anton Finogeev

    (Department of Computer-Aided Design Systems, Penza State University, 40, Krasnaya Str., Penza 440026, Russia)

  • Nikolay Rashevskiy

    (Department of Digital Technologies for Urban Studies, Architecture and Civil Engineering, Volgograd State Technical University, 1 Akademicheskaya Str., Volgograd 400074, Russia)

Abstract

The study of the problem of sustainable development of urban areas led to the understanding of the important role that population involvement plays in solving the issues related to forming a comfortable urban environment. It is normal practice to take into account the proposals and recommendations of citizens and organizations when making decisions in the field of territorial development. Nevertheless, the implementation of participatory governance mechanisms faces significant difficulties. This is primarily due to the lack of effective tools for analyzing the opinion of citizens and technologies for integrating urban communities into existing institutions of governance. This article discusses the ways of organizing expert polls based on the principles of “Socratic dialogue”. The idea of using social networks for testing and promoting urban development projects by analyzing social reactions to various urban initiatives is considered. The possibility of predicting public opinion about a specific solution for urban development using historical data from social networks has been investigated. An approach to the gamification of work with a social response to the urban environment state through virtual interactions with infrastructure objects is proposed. The prospects for gamification to motivate civic participation and improve the efficiency of feedback mechanisms between the city and its residents are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Danila Parygin & Natalia Sadovnikova & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Anton Finogeev & Nikolay Rashevskiy, 2022. "Tools and Technologies for Sustainable Territorial Development in the Context of a Quadruple Innovation Helix," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9086-:d:870898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/15/9086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yawson, Robert M., 2009. "The ecological system of innovation: A new architectural framework for a functional evidence-based platform for science and innovation policy," MPRA Paper 33179, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mona Roman & Henry Varga & Vladimir Cvijanovic & Alasdair Reid, 2020. "Quadruple Helix Models for Sustainable Regional Innovation: Engaging and Facilitating Civil Society Participation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Elisabetta Marinelli & Inmaculada Perianez Forte, 2017. "Smart Specialisation at work: The entrepreneurial discovery as a continuous process," JRC Research Reports JRC108571, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Luis F. Luque-Vega & Miriam A. Carlos-Mancilla & Verónica G. Payán-Quiñónez & Emmanuel Lopez-Neri, 2020. "Smart Cities Oriented Project Planning and Evaluation Methodology Driven by Citizen Perception—IoT Smart Mobility Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Longyu Shi & Linwei Han & Fengmei Yang & Lijie Gao, 2019. "The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Elias Carayannis & Ruslan Rakhmatullin, 2014. "The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(2), pages 212-239, June.
    7. Adriane MacDonald & Amelia Clarke & Lei Huang, 2019. "Multi-stakeholder Partnerships for Sustainability: Designing Decision-Making Processes for Partnership Capacity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(2), pages 409-426, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nikolay Rashevskiy & Natalia Sadovnikova & Tatyana Ereshchenko & Danila Parygin & Alexander Ignatyev, 2023. "Atmospheric Ecology Modeling for the Sustainable Development of the Urban Environment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Ilya Zelenskiy & Danila Parygin & Oksana Savina & Alexey Finogeev & Alexander Gurtyakov, 2022. "Effective Implementation of Integrated Area Development Based on Consumer Attractiveness Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ariful Islam & Sazali Abd Wahab, 2023. "Configuring a Quadruple Helix Innovation Model (QHIM) Based Blueprint for Malaysian SMEs to Survivethe Covid-19 Pandemic," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 13(1), pages 102-127.
    2. Mona Roman & Henry Varga & Vladimir Cvijanovic & Alasdair Reid, 2020. "Quadruple Helix Models for Sustainable Regional Innovation: Engaging and Facilitating Civil Society Participation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Ariful Islam & Sazali Abd Wahab, 2023. "Configuring a Quadruple Helix Innovation Model (QHIM) Based Blueprint for Malaysian SMEs to Survivethe Covid-19 Pandemic," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 107-132.
    4. Roman, Mona & Fellnhofer, Katharina, 2022. "Facilitating the participation of civil society in regional planning: Implementing quadruple helix model in Finnish regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    5. Elias G. Carayannis & Luca Dezi & Gianluca Gregori & Ernesto Calo, 2022. "Smart Environments and Techno-centric and Human-Centric Innovations for Industry and Society 5.0: A Quintuple Helix Innovation System View Towards Smart, Sustainable, and Inclusive Solutions," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 926-955, June.
    6. Nathalie Colasanti & Chiara Fantauzzi & Rocco Frondizi, 2021. "Innovating Public Service Delivery Through Crowdsourcing: What Role for The Third Sector and Civil Society?," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Joanna Morawska-Jancelewicz, 2022. "The Role of Universities in Social Innovation Within Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Model: Practical Implications from Polish Experience," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2230-2271, September.
    8. Amal Marzouki & Arbi Chouikh & Sehl Mellouli & Rim Haddad, 2021. "From Sustainable Development Goals to Sustainable Cities: A Social Media Analysis for Policy-Making Decision," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    9. Talya Ponchek, 2016. "To Collaborate or Not to Collaborate? A Study of the Value of Innovation from a Sectoral Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 43-79, March.
    10. Panori, Anastasia & Kakderi, Christina & Komninos, Nicos & Fellnhofer, Katharina & Reid, Alasdair & Mora, Luca, 2021. "Smart systems of innovation for smart places: Challenges in deploying digital platforms for co-creation and data-intelligence," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    11. Pegkas, Panagiotis & Staikouras, Christos & Tsamadias, Constantinos, 2019. "Does research and development expenditure impact innovation? Evidence from the European Union countries," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 1005-1025.
    12. Suarsana, Laura & Schneider, Tina & Warsewa, Günter, 2023. "Do regional innovation strategies meet societal challenges? A comparative analysis across regions in Belgium, Germany, Netherlands and Finland," Schriftenreihe Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft 40/2023, Institut Arbeit und Wirtschaft (IAW), Universität Bremen und Arbeitnehmerkammer Bremen.
    13. Lijun Zhou & Lucen Liu & Yan Wang & Yuxian Ou & Zijing Zhao, 2021. "Exploring the Relationship between Leisure and Sustainability in a Chinese Hollow Village," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-17, September.
    14. Markus Erbach, 2021. "Managing the economic sustainability of the Belt and Road Initiative by applying Pragmatic Identity Matching PrIM," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Osiris Parcero & James Christopher Ryan, 2024. "Becoming a Knowledge Economy: the Case of Qatar, UAE and 17 Benchmark Countries," Papers 2401.04214, arXiv.org.
    16. Sul Kassicieh, 2016. "Technology Entrepreneurship: Progress of a Clinical Approach Through Time," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 7(1), pages 1-22, March.
    17. Carayannis, Elias G. & Goletsis, Yorgos & Grigoroudis, Evangelos, 2018. "Composite innovation metrics: MCDA and the Quadruple Innovation Helix framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 4-17.
    18. Malte Jütting, 2020. "Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-28, August.
    19. Osiris Jorge Parcero & James Christopher Ryan, 2017. "Becoming a Knowledge Economy: the Case of Qatar, UAE, and 17 Benchmark Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(4), pages 1146-1173, December.
    20. Francesco Campanella & Maria Rosaria Della Peruta & Stefano Bresciani & Luca Dezi, 2017. "Quadruple Helix and firms’ performance: an empirical verification in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 267-284, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:15:p:9086-:d:870898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.