IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i12p7124-d835710.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Polycentric Collaborative Governance, Sustainable Development and the Ecological Resilience of Elevator Safety: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Rijia Ding

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chongbao Ren

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Suli Hao

    (School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qi Lan

    (Institute of Development Strategy, China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Mingbo Tan

    (Institute of Development Strategy, China Special Equipment Inspection and Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

The goal of public security and safety under the concept of sustainable development has been transformed into the maximization of the comprehensive goal of economic, environmental, and social security and safety. The polycentric collaborative governance mode is a crucial approach for the reform of government regulation. Social–ecological resilience has become a typical paradigm in the field of risk governance. Polycentric collaborative governance and safety resilience are the foundation and booster of elevator safety governance. In this paper, we expound on the system elements and mechanisms of polycentric collaborative governance and ecological resilience of elevator safety under the guidance of sustainable development by using a conceptual framework method. On this basis, we explore the influence degree and mechanism of elevator safety polycentric collaborative governance on elevator safety ecological resilience under the guidance of sustainable development by constructing a structural equation model based on micro-survey data. The results show that (1) the polycentric collaborative governance subject composed of the government, business, society, and the public is the key force to enhancing the ecological resilience of elevator safety; (2) enhancing the ecological resilience of elevator safety has a significant direct promoting effect on improving the mitigation, recovery, learning, and coping ability of elevator safety; (3) improving the learning ability has a significant direct promoting effect on improving the mitigation, recovery, and coping ability of elevator safety; (4) improving the coping ability has a significant direct promoting effect on improving the mitigation and recovery ability of elevator safety; (5) improving the mitigation ability has a significant direct promoting effect on improving the recovery ability of elevator safety. Therefore, in the process of elevator safety governance under the guidance of sustainable development, we should not only adhere to the polycentric collaborative governance mode but also attach importance to the ecological resilience governance paradigm of elevator safety, which together can improve the elevator quality and safety level.

Suggested Citation

  • Rijia Ding & Chongbao Ren & Suli Hao & Qi Lan & Mingbo Tan, 2022. "Polycentric Collaborative Governance, Sustainable Development and the Ecological Resilience of Elevator Safety: Evidence from a Structural Equation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-37, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7124-:d:835710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/12/7124/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yahua Wang & Xiangning Chen, 2020. "River chief system as a collaborative water governance approach in China," International Journal of Water Resources Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 610-630, July.
    2. Koebele, Elizabeth A., 2019. "Integrating collaborative governance theory with the Advocacy Coalition Framework," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 39(1), pages 35-64, March.
    3. Xin Duan & Shengli Dai & Rui Yang & Ziwei Duan & Yanhong Tang, 2020. "Environmental Collaborative Governance Degree of Government, Corporation, and Public," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, February.
    4. Lixin Liu & Jiawen Chen & Qingnan Cai & Yaofu Huang & Wei Lang, 2020. "System Building and Multistakeholder Involvement in Public Participatory Community Planning through Both Collaborative- and Micro-Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Cristina González-Quintero & V. Sophie Avila-Foucat, 2019. "Operationalization and Measurement of Social-Ecological Resilience: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Yaoyao Wu & Hao Guo & Jing’ai Wang, 2018. "Quantifying the Similarity in Perceptions of Multiple Stakeholders in Dingcheng, China, on Agricultural Drought Risk Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radtke, Jörg & Scherhaufer, Patrick, 2022. "A social science perspective on conflicts in the energy transition: An introduction to the special issue," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    2. Khalilullah Mayar & David G. Carmichael & Xuesong Shen, 2022. "Resilience and Systems—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Aerang Nam & Christopher M. Weible & Kyudong Park, 2022. "Polarization and frames of advocacy coalitions in South Korea's nuclear energy policy," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(4), pages 387-410, July.
    4. Linhai Wu & Liwei Zhang & Yufeng Li, 2023. "Basis for fulfilling responsibilities, behavior, and professionalism of government agencies and effectiveness in public–public collaboration for food safety risk management," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Batara Surya & Hamsina Hamsina & Ridwan Ridwan & Baharuddin Baharuddin & Firman Menne & Andi Tenri Fitriyah & Emil Salim Rasyidi, 2020. "The Complexity of Space Utilization and Environmental Pollution Control in the Main Corridor of Makassar City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-41, November.
    6. Tomas Gabriel Bas & Jacques Gagnon & Philippe Gagnon & Angela Contreras, 2022. "Analysis of Agro Alternatives to Boost Cameroon’s Socio-Environmental Resilience, Sustainable Development, and Conservation of Native Forests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    7. Neal D. Woods, 2021. "The State of State Environmental Policy Research: A Thirty‐Year Progress Report," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 347-369, May.
    8. Huijie Li & Jie Li, 2021. "Risk Governance and Sustainability: A Scientometric Analysis and Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    9. Yifei Niu & Xi Wang & Ciyun Lin, 2022. "A Study on the Impact of Organizing Environmental Awareness and Education on the Performance of Environmental Governance in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    10. Marco d’Errico & Jeanne Pinay & Ellestina Jumbe & Anh Hong Luu, 2023. "Drivers and stressors of resilience to food insecurity: evidence from 35 countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(5), pages 1161-1183, October.
    11. Syafri Syafri & Batara Surya & Ridwan Ridwan & Syamsul Bahri & Emil Salim Rasyidi & Sudarman Sudarman, 2020. "Water Quality Pollution Control and Watershed Management Based on Community Participation in Maros City, South Sulawesi, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-39, December.
    12. Xiang-Fei Ma & Ru Zhang & Yi-Fan Ruan, 2022. "Evaluation of Common Prosperity Level and Regional Difference Based on the Background of Green Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    13. Dexin Wang & Shijun Li, 2022. "Innovation of Contemporary Chinese Urban Community Governance under the Perspective of Social Capital: Participation of Multiple Subjects Based on Community Proposals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Xiaohong Chen & Jiefu Zhang & Huixiang Zeng, 2020. "Is corporate environmental responsibility synergistic with governmental environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3669-3686, December.
    15. Zhou, Di & Zhong, Zhuoxi & Chen, Lubin & Gao, Weixin & Wang, Mingzhe, 2022. "Can the joint regional air pollution control policy achieve a win-win outcome for the environment and economy? Evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 13-33.
    16. Zixuan Zhang & Junchen Pan & Yun Qian, 2023. "Collaborative Governance for Participatory Regeneration Practices in Old Residential Communities within the Chinese Context: Cases from Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    17. Jue Wang & Yi Yang & Huan Huang & Fan Wang, 2022. "Stakeholder Management in Government-Led Urban Regeneration: A Case Study of the Eastern Suburbs in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Jiangmin Yang & Desheng Xue & Gengzhi Huang, 2020. "The Changing Factors Affecting Local Environmental Governance in China: Evidence from a Study of Prefecture-Level Cities in Guangdong Province," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
    19. Xiaoqin Guo & Xiang Li, 2022. "A Study on Community Public Safety Collaborative Governance Regime in the Background of COVID-19: Empirical Analysis Based on China and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Jinyang Li & Chao Xiong & Yunrong Huang, 2024. "How the River Chief System Achieved River Pollution Control: Analysis Based on AGIL Paradigm," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-25, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:12:p:7124-:d:835710. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.