IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i11p6412-d822867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Influence of Risk on Construction Project Performance: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Guiliang Su

    (Smart Construction and Innovation Center, School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541000, China)

  • Rana Khallaf

    (Department of Structural Engineering and Construction Management, Future University in Egypt, New Cairo 11835, Egypt)

Abstract

Knowledge on the influence of risk on project performance is an important part of risk management. Previous studies have concentrated on this area to identify risks in aspects of project performance such as cost and schedule. However, rare reviews have been conducted to fully report on the research on the influence of risk on project performance. For this reason, to identify and analyze such researches in these areas a systematic review was conducted in this paper. More specifically, 54 relevant articles were identified and classified into three groups according to their research contents; the research contents in each article and the research methods were reviewed, and the 13 most frequent research methods were also identified and discussed. It was found that most of the previous researches concentrated on developing tools or approaches to assess the influence of risk on project performance. Additionally, researches focused on risk factors’ identification or risk interdependency modeling were also common, along with researches that investigated the cause of poor project performance, evaluated risk impact on cost contingency, discussed the risk response actions, and discussed what enables high-risk projects to yield a high return. However, four gaps were identified from these researches, namely: a need for improving the accuracy in quantitative research of the influence of risk on project performance; a need for novel research methodologies for conducting more accurate risk influence assessments; taking into consideration project participants’ decision-making in their researches; and creating a framework that treats the risk influence assessment as a whole system. Besides that, since this research only focused on two project objectives (cost and schedule), recommendations for future research include expanding the focus to more project objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Guiliang Su & Rana Khallaf, 2022. "Research on the Influence of Risk on Construction Project Performance: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6412-:d:822867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6412/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/11/6412/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruqaya Al-Sabah & Carol C. Menassa & Awad Hanna, 2014. "Evaluating impact of construction risks in the Arabian Gulf Region from perspective of multinational architecture, engineering and construction firms," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 382-402, April.
    2. Ahsan Nawaz & Ahsan Waqar & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah & Muhammad Sajid & Muhammad Irslan Khalid, 2019. "An Innovative Framework for Risk Management in Construction Projects in Developing Countries: Evidence from Pakistan," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Hamidreza Khalesi & Amirhossein Balali & Alireza Valipour & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Darius Migilinskas & Viaceslav Zigmund, 2020. "Application of Hybrid SWARA–BIM in Reducing Reworks of Building Construction Projects from the Perspective of Time," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Seyed Mohammad Seyedhoseini & Siamak Noori & Mohammad Ali Hatefi, 2009. "An Integrated Methodology for Assessment and Selection of the Project Risk Response Actions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 752-763, May.
    5. I Putu Artama Wiguna & Stephen Scott, 2006. "Relating risk to project performance in Indonesian building contracts," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(11), pages 1125-1135.
    6. Tasci, Asli D.A. & Wei, Wei & Milman, Ady, 2020. "Uses and misuses of the case study method," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    7. Jin Woo Won & Wooyong Jung & Seung Heon Han & Sungmin Yun & Bonsang Koo, 2019. "What Enables a High-Risk Project to Yield High Return from a Construction Contractor’s Perspective?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, October.
    8. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Javier Romero & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez, 2020. "Finding the Links between Risk Management and Project Success: Evidence from International Development Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Henry A. Odeyinka & John Lowe & Ammar P. Kaka, 2013. "Artificial neural network cost flow risk assessment model," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(5), pages 423-439, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yonggu Kim & Keeyoung Shin & Joseph Ahn & Eul-Bum Lee, 2017. "Probabilistic Cash Flow-Based Optimal Investment Timing Using Two-Color Rainbow Options Valuation for Economic Sustainability Appraisement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Ahsan Nawaz & Xing Su & Qaiser Mohi Ud Din & Muhammad Irslan Khalid & Muhammad Bilal & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah, 2020. "Identification of the H&S (Health and Safety Factors) Involved in Infrastructure Projects in Developing Countries-A Sequential Mixed Method Approach of OLMT-Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-18, January.
    3. Xiaoyan Jiang & Sai Wang & Jie Wang & Sainan Lyu & Martin Skitmore, 2020. "A Decision Method for Construction Safety Risk Management Based on Ontology and Improved CBR: Example of a Subway Project," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Dengsheng Wu & Xiaoqian Zhu & Jie Wan & Chunbing Bao & Jianping Li, 2019. "A Multiobjective Optimization Approach for Selecting Risk Response Strategies of Software Project: From the Perspective of Risk Correlations," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(01), pages 339-364, January.
    5. Mahsa Parsaei Motamed & Shahrooz Bamdad, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization approach for selecting risk response actions: considering environmental and secondary risks," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 266-303, March.
    6. Ji, Chenyi & Su, Xing & Qin, Zhongfu & Nawaz, Ahsan, 2022. "Probability Analysis of Construction Risk based on Noisy-or Gate Bayesian Networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    7. Nicholas Thom & Andrew Dawson, 2019. "Sustainable Road Design: Promoting Recycling and Non-Conventional Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-12, November.
    8. Hsu-Shih Shih & I-Fei Chen & Nolberto Munier & Zena Alcide, 2023. "Investigating Risk-Constraint Nexus of Construction Projects in Caribbean Small Island Developing States," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.
    9. Yali Chen & Dan Huang & Zhen Liu & Mohamed Osmani & Peter Demian, 2022. "Construction 4.0, Industry 4.0, and Building Information Modeling (BIM) for Sustainable Building Development within the Smart City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-37, August.
    10. Fatemeh Mostofi & Vedat Toğan & Yunus Emre Ayözen & Onur Behzat Tokdemir, 2022. "Predicting the Impact of Construction Rework Cost Using an Ensemble Classifier," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Yiqing Su & Qiaoyuan Huang & Qi Meng & Liangzhen Zang & Hua Xiao, 2023. "Socialized Farmland Operation—An Institutional Interpretation of Farmland Scale Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    12. Xiao Han & Jiayun Zhang, 2022. "Business Model Innovation Paths of Manufacturing Oriented towards Green Development in Digital Economy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-34, December.
    13. Hui-Ping Tserng & I-Cheng Cho & Chun-Hung Chen & Yu-Fan Liu, 2021. "Developing a Risk Management Process for Infrastructure Projects Using IDEF0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    14. Tirataci Hakan & Yaman Hakan, 2023. "Estimation of ideal construction duration in tender preparation stage for housing projects," Organization, Technology and Management in Construction, Sciendo, vol. 15(1), pages 192-212, January.
    15. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Kluska, Mike & Knaisch, Jonas & Selle, Juliane, 2021. "Senkung der Unternehmenssteuerlast versus Förderung von Investitionen: Was ist die bessere Strategie zur Förderung der Standortattraktivität Deutschlands?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 263, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    16. Hamad Almujibah, 2023. "Assessment of Building Information Modeling (BIM) as a Time and Cost-Saving Construction Management Tool: Evidence from Two-Story Villas in Jeddah," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    17. John Malu Nzioki & Dr. Mary Nyawira Mwenda, 2021. "Enhancing Performance of the Building Construction Industry through Quantitative Risk Analysis and Risk Response: A Case of Exchequer Funded Building Construction Projects in Machakos County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(3), pages 31-39, March.
    18. Chien-Liang Lin & Bey-Kun Chen, 2021. "Research for Risk Management of Construction Projects in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Eichfelder, Sebastian & Kluska, Mike & Knaisch, Jonas & Selle, Juliane, 2021. "Senkung der Unternehmenssteuerlast versus Förderung von Investitionen: Was ist die bessere Strategie zur Förderung der Standortattraktivität Deutschlands?," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 266, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    20. Liaqat Ali & Ahsan Nawaz & Shahid Iqbal & Muhammad Aamir Basheer & Javaria Hameed & Gadah Albasher & Syyed Adnan Raheel Shah & Yong Bai, 2021. "Dynamics of Transit Oriented Development, Role of Greenhouse Gases and Urban Environment: A Study for Management and Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:11:p:6412-:d:822867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.