IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6241-d820068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Driver Behavioral Classification on Curves Based on the Relationship between Speed, Trajectories, and Eye Movements: A Driving Simulator Study

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Emilia Schio Rondora

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering (EESC), University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

  • Ali Pirdavani

    (UHasselt, Faculty of Engineering Technology, Agoralaan, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
    UHasselt, Transportation Research Institute (IMOB), Agoralaan, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium)

  • Ana Paula C. Larocca

    (Department of Transportation Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering (EESC), University of São Paulo (USP), São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil)

Abstract

Horizontal curves of rural highways are prone to a considerably high number of fatalities because an erroneous perception can lead to unsafe driving. This generally occurs when a driver fails to notice the highway geometry or changes in the driving environment, particularly curved segments. This study aimed to understand the geometric characteristics of curved segments, such as radius and approach tangents, on the driving performance towards minimizing vehicle crashes. Speed profiles and lateral position, the most common indicators of successful negotiation in curves, and eye movements were recorded during an experiment conducted in a fixed-base driving simulator equipped with an eye-tracking system with a road infrastructure (a three-lane highway) and its surroundings. A driving simulator can faithfully reproduce any situation and enable sustainable research because it is a high-tech and cost-effective tool allowing repeatability in a laboratory. The experiment was conducted with 28 drivers who covered approximately 500 test kilometers with 90 horizontal curves comprising nine different combinations of radii and approach tangent lengths. The drivers’ behavior on each curve was classified as ideal, normal, intermediate, cutting, or correcting according to their trajectories and speed changes for analyses of the performance parameters and their correlation conducted by factorial ANOVA and Pearson chi-square tests. The cross-tabulation results indicated that the safest behavior significantly increased when the curve radius increased, and the performance measures of curve radii were greatly affected. However, the driving behavior was not affected by the approach tangent length. The results revealed segments of the road that require a driver’s closer attention for essential vehicle control, critical information, and vehicle control in different parts of the task.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Emilia Schio Rondora & Ali Pirdavani & Ana Paula C. Larocca, 2022. "Driver Behavioral Classification on Curves Based on the Relationship between Speed, Trajectories, and Eye Movements: A Driving Simulator Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6241-:d:820068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarvesh Kolekar & Joost Winter & David Abbink, 2020. "Human-like driving behaviour emerges from a risk-based driver model," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feipeng Wang & Diana Filipa Araújo & Yan-Fu Li, 2023. "Reliability assessment of autonomous vehicles based on the safety control structure," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(2), pages 389-404, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6241-:d:820068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.