IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i10p6022-d816499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Region

Author

Listed:
  • Maw Ni Soe Htet

    (State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling District, Xianyang 712100, China
    Rice Bio Park Research Section, Post-Harvest Technology and Food Science Research Division, Department of Agricultural Research, Yezin, Nay Pyi Taw 15013, Myanmar)

  • Honglu Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling District, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Vivek Yadav

    (State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology in Arid Areas, College of Horticulture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling District, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Thongsouk Sompouviseth

    (Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and the Agri-Environment in Northwest China, College of Natural Resource and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling District, Xianyang 712100, China)

  • Baili Feng

    (State Key Laboratory of Crop Stress Biology for Arid Areas, College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling District, Xianyang 712100, China)

Abstract

The changing climate, inadequate water supply, insufficient agricultural inputs, decreasing in agricultural arable land areas under forage crops of Northwestern Loess Plateau region, expanding livestock population, increasing demands for meat and milk production, and food and feed security concerns all insist on a necessary requirement in forage quality production. Cereal–legume mixed-cropping is a biological approach to enhancing herbage yield and quality of upgraded animal feed (forage and silage). However, little information exists about the appropriate mixing seeding ratios and its impacts on yield and quality. Therefore, this study was conducted to examine the forage yield and nutritional quality of maize ( Zea mays L.) and common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in mono-and mixed-cropping approaches at the seeding proportions of 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 45:55, 25:75, and 0:100 in 2019 and 2020 in Northwestern Loess Plateau region. A randomized complete block design with four replicates was used in this experiment. The results indicated that forage quality was significantly affected by the mixture ratios. The land equivalent ratio (LER) of all mixed-cropping treatments greater than 1.0, in which maize–common bean at the 50:50 seeding ratio achieved higher LER (1.46) than that of other treatments, showing that mixed-cropping combination systems are better users of land resources. Laboratory forage quality analysis and Pearson correlation analysis showed that the relative feed value had highly positive correlation with total digestible nutrients and relative forage quality in mixed-cropping treatments. Our results showed that fresh forage yield and dry matter yield were higher in monocropped maize forage than in other intercropped forages, whereas crude protein yield was lower compared with other mixed cropping forages. After 60 days of ensiling, the highest organic acid profile and ammonia-nitrogen were observed in M25:CB75 silage compared with other silages. The highest ensilability of fermentation coefficient was also found in M50:CB50 compared with other intercropped silages. Regarding forage preservation, silage showed higher contents of crude protein, relative feed value and lower crude fiber, water-soluble carbohydrate neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent fiber contents than forage. This study determined that the ratios of maize–common bean 25:75 and 50:50 were the most desirable mixture ratios among mixed-cropped forage and silage based on chemical composition and quality analysis for livestock feeding.

Suggested Citation

  • Maw Ni Soe Htet & Honglu Wang & Vivek Yadav & Thongsouk Sompouviseth & Baili Feng, 2022. "Legume Integration Augments the Forage Productivity and Quality in Maize-Based System in the Loess Plateau Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6022-:d:816499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6022/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/10/6022/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kazimierz Klima & Agnieszka Synowiec & Joanna Puła & Maciej Chowaniak & Katarzyna Pużyńska & Dorota Gala-Czekaj & Angelika Kliszcz & Patryk Galbas & Beata Jop & Teresa Dąbkowska & Andrzej Lepiarczyk, 2020. "Long-Term Productive, Competitive, and Economic Aspects of Spring Cereal Mixtures in Integrated and Organic Crop Rotations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Sultan Begna & Sangamesh Angadi & Abdel Mesbah & Rangappa Mathada Umesh & Michael Stamm, 2021. "Forage Yield and Quality of Winter Canola–Pea Mixed Cropping System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Musen Wang & Run Gao & Marcia Franco & David B. Hannaway & Wencan Ke & Zitong Ding & Zhu Yu & Xusheng Guo, 2021. "Effect of Mixing Alfalfa with Whole-Plant Corn in Different Proportions on Fermentation Characteristics and Bacterial Community of Silage," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, February.
    4. Maw Ni Soe Htet & Jiang-Bo Hai & Poe Thinzar Bo & Xiang-Wei Gong & Chun-Juan Liu & Ke Dang & Li-Xin Tian & Rab Nawaz Soomro & Khaing Lin Aung & Bai-Li Feng, 2021. "Evaluation of Nutritive Values through Comparison of Forage Yield and Silage Quality of Mono-Cropped and Intercropped Maize-Soybean Harvested at Two Maturity Stages," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Jamal Nasar & Ashfaq Alam & Aisha Nasar & Muhammad Zubair Khan, 2019. "Intercropping Induce Changes in Above and Below Ground Plant Compartments in Mixed Cropping System," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 17(5), pages 13043-13050, May.
    6. Run Gao & Bing Wang & Tingting Jia & Ying Luo & Zhu Yu, 2021. "Effects of Different Carbohydrate Sources on Alfalfa Silage Quality at Different Ensiling Days," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.
    7. Walid Soufan & Nasser A. Al-Suhaibani, 2021. "Optimizing Yield and Quality of Silage and Hay for Pea–Barley Mixtures Ratio under Irrigated Arid Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-9, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walid Soufan & Nasser A. Al-Suhaibani, 2021. "Optimizing Yield and Quality of Silage and Hay for Pea–Barley Mixtures Ratio under Irrigated Arid Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Lech Gałęzewski & Iwona Jaskulska & Dariusz Jaskulski & Edward Wilczewski & Marek Kościński, 2022. "Strip Intercrop of Barley, Wheat, Triticale, Oat, Pea and Yellow Lupine—A Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. M. R. Umesh & Sangu Angadi & Sultan Begna & Prasanna Gowda, 2022. "Planting Density and Geometry Effect on Canopy Development, Forage Yield and Nutritive Value of Sorghum and Annual Legumes Intercropping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Anna Wenda-Piesik & Dariusz Piesik, 2020. "Diversity of Species and the Occurrence and Development of a Specialized Pest Population—A Review Article," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    5. Katarzyna Pużyńska & Stanisław Pużyński & Agnieszka Synowiec & Jan Bocianowski & Andrzej Lepiarczyk, 2021. "Grain Yield and Total Protein Content of Organically Grown Oats–Vetch Mixtures Depending on Soil Type and Oats’ Cultivar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:10:p:6022-:d:816499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.