IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2021i1p111-d709251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Sociodemographic Factors on Construction Fieldworkers’ Safety Risk Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullahi Ibrahim

    (Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

  • Chukwuma Nnaji

    (Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA)

  • Mahmoud Shakouri

    (Department of Construction Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

Abstract

Construction operations are hazardous, leading to thousands of accidents, injuries, and fatalities annually. Safety risk assessment (SRA) is a key component necessary to respond to hazards effectively. Individuals have different perceptions of the riskiness of construction hazards, and studies have shown that different sociodemographic factors among employees can alter their SRA skills. However, their role in the US construction industry has been understudied, and this analysis investigates this topic further. Following a detailed systematic review of the relevant literature, quantitative data were collected from 181 construction fieldworkers in the United States using images integrated into an interactive questionnaire survey. Responses on the severity and frequency of seven potential accident causes were captured and analyzed. Findings from the literature review revealed six key sociodemographic factors—age, education, training, gender, ethnicity, and work type—that could impact fieldworkers’ SRA. However, a quantitative analysis suggests that only education is a significant influence, and sociodemographic factors had a statistically significant impact on less than five percent of the assessments. Therefore, the present study proposes that future investigation within the SRA domain should complement sociodemographic factors with critical behavioral factors that are rarely discussed, such as cognitive biases, personality traits, and safety behavior. As a foundational study for safety researchers and practitioners, the results provide information on SRA that can help enhance the safety and workforce sustainability of construction companies with a diverse workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullahi Ibrahim & Chukwuma Nnaji & Mahmoud Shakouri, 2021. "Influence of Sociodemographic Factors on Construction Fieldworkers’ Safety Risk Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:111-:d:709251
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/111/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/1/111/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew Hallowell, 2010. "Safety risk perception in construction companies in the Pacific Northwest of the USA," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 403-413.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Félix Yamuza-González & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Manuel Otero-Mateo, 2022. "Requirements for the Preliminary Design of Innovative Temporary Edge Protection Systems (TEPS) for Construction Works," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-46, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Morshedi, Mohamad Ali & Kashani, Hamed, 2022. "Assessment of vulnerability reduction policies: Integration of economic and cognitive models of decision-making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    2. Sivakumar, Senthilkumar, 2022. "A novel Integrated Risk Management Method for Airport operations," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    3. Graeme D. Larsen & Jennifer Whyte, 2013. "Safe construction through design: perspectives from the site team," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 675-690, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2021:i:1:p:111-:d:709251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.