IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12666-d680364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study on Intelligent Technology Valuation System: Introduction of KIBO Patent Appraisal System II

Author

Listed:
  • Min-Seung Kim

    (Department of Computer Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

  • Chan-Ho Lee

    (Department of Computer Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

  • Ji-Hye Choi

    (Department of Computer Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

  • Yong-Ju Jang

    (Department of Computer Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

  • Jeong-Hee Lee

    (Department of Computer Science, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

  • Jaesik Lee

    (Central Technology Institute, Korea Technology Finance Corporation, Seoul 06771, Korea)

  • Tae-Eung Sung

    (Division of Software, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

Abstract

Technology finance, which has attracted worldwide attention for the successful business development of small-and-medium enterprises (SMEs) or start-ups, has advanced an innovation or stagnation way-out resolution strategy for companies in line with the low-growth economic trends. Although the development of new technologies and the establishment of active R&D and commercialization strategies are essential factors in a company’s management sustainability, the activation of the technology market in practice is still in progress for its golden age. In this study, to promote a technology transfer-based company’s growth and to run technology-based various financial support activities, we develop and propose a new intelligent, deep learning-based technology valuation system that enables technology holders to estimate the economic values of their innovative technologies and further to establish a firm’s commercialization strategy. For the last years, the KIBO Patent Appraisal System (KPAS-II) herein proposed has been advanced by KIBO as a web-based, artificial intelligence (AI) and evaluation data applications valuation system that automatically calculates and estimates a technology’s feasible economic value by utilizing both the intrinsic and extrinsic index information of a patent and the commercialization entity’s business capabilities, and by applying to the discounted cash flow (DCF) method in valuation theory, and finally integrating with deep learning results based on the in-advance previously established patent DB and the financial DB. The KPAS-II proposed in this study can be said to have dramatically overcome the long-term preparation period and high levels of R&D and commercialization costs in terms of the limitations that the existing technology valuation method possesses by enhancing the reliability of approximate economic values from the deep learning results based on financial data and completed valuation data. In addition, it is expected that technology marketing coordinators, researchers, and non-specialty business agents, not limited to valuation experts, can easily estimate the economic values of their patents or technologies, and they can be actively utilized in a technology-based company’s decision-making and technologically dependent financial activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Min-Seung Kim & Chan-Ho Lee & Ji-Hye Choi & Yong-Ju Jang & Jeong-Hee Lee & Jaesik Lee & Tae-Eung Sung, 2021. "A Study on Intelligent Technology Valuation System: Introduction of KIBO Patent Appraisal System II," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12666-:d:680364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12666/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12666/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorraine Uhlaner & André Stel & Valérie Duplat & Haibo Zhou, 2013. "Disentangling the effects of organizational capabilities, innovation and firm size on SME sales growth," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 581-607, October.
    2. Usman Sattar & Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Rashid Latief, 2020. "How Audit Quality Affects the Firm Performance with the Moderating Role of the Product Market Competition: Empirical Evidence from Pakistani Manufacturing Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Jun, Seung-Pyo & Yeom, Jaeho & Son, Jong-Ku, 2014. "A study of the method using search traffic to analyze new technology adoption," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 82-95.
    4. Min-Seung Kim & Jeong-Hee Lee & Yong-Ju Jang & Chan-Ho Lee & Ji-Hye Choi & Tae-Eung Sung, 2020. "Hybrid Deep Learning Algorithm with Open Innovation Perspective: A Prediction Model of Asthmatic Occurrence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chie Hoon Song, 2023. "Examining the Patent Landscape of E-Fuel Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaodong Yuan & Weiling Song, 2022. "Evaluating technology innovation capabilities of companies based on entropy- TOPSIS: the case of solar cell companies," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 65-76, June.
    2. Wilfred Dolfsma & Gerben Velde, 2014. "Industry innovativeness, firm size, and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter Mark III?," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 713-736, September.
    3. Jihai Lu & Sohail Ahmad Javeed & Rashid Latief & Tao Jiang & Tze San Ong, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Association of Internal Corporate Governance and Profitability; Evidence from Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-22, May.
    4. Khowanas Saeed Qader & Kemal Cek, 2023. "Analysis of the Impact of External Auditors’ Autonomy on Financial Accounting Information Quality Case Study Commercial Banks in Northern Iraq," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-21, June.
    5. Daniel Ruiz-Palomo & Manuel à ngel Fernández-Gámez & Ana León-Gómez, 2022. "Analyzing the Effect of Financial Constraints on Technological and Management Innovation in SMEs: A Gender Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    6. Dirk Clercq & Narongsak Thongpapanl & Maxim Voronov, 2018. "Sustainability in the Face of Institutional Adversity: Market Turbulence, Network Embeddedness, and Innovative Orientation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 437-455, March.
    7. Antonio Prencipe & Luciano D'Amico & Danilo Boffa & Christian Corsi, 2024. "The effect of output additionality of public funding support on firm innovation. Evidence from firms of different sizes," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 2278-2299, April.
    8. De Clercq, Dirk & Belausteguigoitia, Imanol, 2015. "Intergenerational strategy involvement and family firms’ innovation pursuits: The critical roles of conflict management and social capital," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 6(3), pages 178-189.
    9. Stav Fainshmidt & Amir Pezeshkan & M. Lance Frazier & Anil Nair & Edward Markowski, 2016. "Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation and Extension," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(8), pages 1348-1380, December.
    10. Grimmer, Louise & Grimmer, Martin & Mortimer, Gary, 2018. "The more things change the more they stay the same: A replicated study of small retail firm resources," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 54-63.
    11. Francesco Aiello & Paola Cardamone & Lidia Mannarino & Valeria Pupo, 2021. "Does external R&D matter for family firm innovation? Evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1915-1930, December.
    12. Alexandra Tsvetkova & Jean-Claude Thill & Deborah Strumsky, 2014. "Metropolitan innovation, firm size, and business survival in a high-tech industry," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 661-676, October.
    13. Jun, Seung-Pyo & Park, Do-Hyung, 2016. "Consumer information search behavior and purchasing decisions: Empirical evidence from Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 97-111.
    14. Ganotakis, Panagiotis & Angelidou, Sofia & Saridakis, Charalampos & Piperopoulos, Panagiotis & Dindial, Miguel, 2023. "Innovation, digital technologies, and sales growth during exogenous shocks," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    15. Jun, Seung-Pyo & Yoo, Hyoung Sun & Lee, Jae-Seong, 2021. "The impact of the pandemic declaration on public awareness and behavior: Focusing on COVID-19 google searches," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    16. Rotolo, Daniele & Hicks, Diana & Martin, Ben R., 2015. "What is an emerging technology?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1827-1843.
    17. Jun, Seung-Pyo & Park, Do-Hyung & Yeom, Jaeho, 2014. "The possibility of using search traffic information to explore consumer product attitudes and forecast consumer preference," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 237-253.
    18. Malyy, Maksim & Tekic, Zeljko & Podladchikova, Tatiana, 2021. "The value of big data for analyzing growth dynamics of technology-based new ventures," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    19. Costantiello, Alberto & Laureti, Lucio & De Cristoforo, Gianluca & Leogrande, Angelo, 2021. "The Innovation-Sales Growth Nexus in Europe," MPRA Paper 106858, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 Mar 2021.
    20. Chiho Ok & He Soung Ahn, 2019. "How Does Entrepreneurial Orientation Influence the Sustainable Growth of SMEs? The Role of Relative Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12666-:d:680364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.