IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i22p12452-d676965.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Environmental Risk Assessment of Filling Stations Using the Principles of Security Management. A Case Study in the Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Katarína Mäkká

    (Faculty of Security Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Katarína Kampová

    (Faculty of Security Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Tomáš Loveček

    (Faculty of Security Engineering, University of Žilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 01026 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Katarína Petrlová

    (Mathematical Institute in Opava, Silesian University in Opava, Na Rybníčku 626/1, 74 601 Opava, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The issue of environmental risk assessment currently deserves great attention. In order to protect the environment, maintain healthy living conditions, and prevent environmental damage, the member states of the European Union have adopted a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage. The directive classifies two types of operators with different liability regimes for environmental damage, namely, the regime with no-fault (strict) liability and liability for fault. With the adoption of the directive, among experts, operators and the general public have posed questions about how to assess the risk of environmental damage. At present, there is still no uniform procedure for assessing environmental risks, which would create a comprehensive methodological framework for assessment for this type of risk. Due to the non-existent risk assessment methodology for operators with strict liability regimes and the lack of a systematic search for risk sources, a risk assessment procedure is proposed that provides guidance in a sequence of several steps on how to implement the obligations arising from the adopted Environmental Liability Directive. The proposed procedure was verified on a specific operator with a strict liability regime. The environmental risk analysis performed through the proposed procedure provided information on possible operational problems and verified its applicability. Last but not least, the use of the proposed procedure makes it possible to identify serious sources of risk and to establish necessary preventive measures to prevent the occurrence of environmental damage.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarína Mäkká & Katarína Kampová & Tomáš Loveček & Katarína Petrlová, 2021. "An Environmental Risk Assessment of Filling Stations Using the Principles of Security Management. A Case Study in the Slovak Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12452-:d:676965
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12452/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/22/12452/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadiatul Nazleen Ajman & Noor Yasmin Zainun & Noralfishah Sulaiman & Shabir Hussain Khahro & Farid Ezanee Mohamed Ghazali & Mohd Hilton Ahmad, 2021. "Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Using Geographical Information System (GIS): An Integrated Land Suitability Analysis of Filling Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:22:p:12452-:d:676965. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.