IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11359-d656356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

UAV-Based Bridge Inspection via Transfer Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Mostafa Aliyari

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Engineering and Economics, Østfold University College, 1757 Halden, Norway)

  • Enrique Lopez Droguett

    (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Garrick Institute for the Risk Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA)

  • Yonas Zewdu Ayele

    (Faculty of Computer Science, Engineering and Economics, Østfold University College, 1757 Halden, Norway
    Department of Risk, Safety and Security, Institute for Energy Technology, 1777 Halden, Norway)

Abstract

As bridge inspection becomes more advanced and more ubiquitous, artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, such as machine and deep learning, could offer suitable solutions to the nation’s problems of overdue bridge inspections. AI coupling with various data that can be captured by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) enables fully automated bridge inspections. The key to the success of automated bridge inspection is a model capable of detecting failures from UAV data like images and films. In this context, this paper investigates the performances of state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks (CNNs) through transfer learning for crack detection in UAV-based bridge inspection. The performance of different CNN models is evaluated via UAV-based inspection of Skodsberg Bridge, located in eastern Norway. The low-level features are extracted in the last layers of the CNN models and these layers are trained using 19,023 crack and non-crack images. There is always a trade-off between the number of trainable parameters that CNN models need to learn for each specific task and the number of non-trainable parameters that come from transfer learning. Therefore, selecting the optimized amount of transfer learning is a challenging task and, as there is not enough research in this area, it will be studied in this paper. Moreover, UAV-based bridge inception images require specific attention to establish a suitable dataset as the input of CNN models that are trained on homogenous images. However, in the real implementation of CNN models in UAV-based bridge inspection images, there are always heterogeneities and noises, such as natural and artificial effects like different luminosities, spatial positions, and colors of the elements in an image. In this study, the effects of such heterogeneities on the performance of CNN models via transfer learning are examined. The results demonstrate that with a simplified image cropping technique and with minimum effort to preprocess images, CNN models can identify crack elements from non-crack elements with 81% accuracy. Moreover, the results show that heterogeneities inherent in UAV-based bridge inspection data significantly affect the performance of CNN models with an average 32.6% decrease of accuracy of the CNN models. It is also found that deeper CNN models do not provide higher accuracy compared to the shallower CNN models when the number of images for adoption to a specific task, in this case crack detection, is not large enough; in this study, 19,023 images and shallower models outperform the deeper models.

Suggested Citation

  • Mostafa Aliyari & Enrique Lopez Droguett & Yonas Zewdu Ayele, 2021. "UAV-Based Bridge Inspection via Transfer Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-27, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11359-:d:656356
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11359/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11359/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kamal Achuthan & Nick Hay & Mostafa Aliyari & Yonas Zewdu Ayele, 2021. "A Digital Information Model Framework for UAS-Enabled Bridge Inspection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Yonas Zewdu Ayele & Mostafa Aliyari & David Griffiths & Enrique Lopez Droguett, 2020. "Automatic Crack Segmentation for UAV-Assisted Bridge Inspection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-16, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kamal Achuthan & Nick Hay & Mostafa Aliyari & Yonas Zewdu Ayele, 2021. "A Digital Information Model Framework for UAS-Enabled Bridge Inspection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    2. Heather Holden & Maha Hussein Abdallah & Dane Rowlands, 2023. "A study to assess the applicability of using remote sensing to minimize service interruption of Canadian port physical infrastructure," Journal of Transportation Security, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Faten Aljalaud & Heba Kurdi & Kamal Youcef-Toumi, 2023. "Autonomous Multi-UAV Path Planning in Pipe Inspection Missions Based on Booby Behavior," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Jonghyeon Yoon & Hyunkyu Shin & Mihwa Song & Heungbae Gil & Sanghyo Lee, 2022. "A Crack Width Measurement Method of UAV Images Using High-Resolution Algorithms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Matija Krznar & Danijel Pavković & Mihael Cipek & Juraj Benić, 2021. "Modeling, Controller Design and Simulation Groundwork on Multirotor Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Hybrid Power Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-26, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11359-:d:656356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.