IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i8p3470-d349772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Benefits of the Sustainability Reporting Practices in the Top Romanian Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Anca Gabriela Petrescu

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Valahia University, 130024 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Florentina Raluca Bîlcan

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Valahia University, 130024 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Marius Petrescu

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Valahia University, 130024 Targoviste, Romania)

  • Ionica Holban Oncioiu

    (Faculty of Finance-Banking, Accounting and Business Administration, Titu Maiorescu University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Mirela Cătălina Türkeș

    (Faculty of Finance, Banking and Accountancy, Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania)

  • Sorinel Căpuşneanu

    (Faculty of Finance-Banking, Accounting and Business Administration, Titu Maiorescu University, 040051 Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The concept of sustainability reporting has been addressed by experts worldwide and is defined as the process of communicating the social and environmental effects of the economic actions of organizations to special interest groups within society in general. The main purpose of this research was to identify and analyze the opinions of the real benefits obtained by large companies in Romania following the elaboration of sustainability reports and their contribution to the development of a sustainable economy. A quantitative marketing research was carried out on the sample randomly extracted from a target community of the largest 5750 companies across 35 counties that were active in strategic priority areas of Romania. Both explicitly and implicitly, the research resulted in essential aspects related to the correlation of the sustainability strategy with sustainability reporting, how sustainable development goals contribute to improving all of the processes included in the integrated company management system, how the internal and external benefits can contribute to increasing economic, social, and environmental performance, and building sustainable relationships with shareholders, employees, and stakeholders. In addition, the findings show that aligning a sustainability strategy with a global business strategy and including sustainability reporting requirements (non-financial) are important concerns at the level of the top companies in Romania.

Suggested Citation

  • Anca Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Ionica Holban Oncioiu & Mirela Cătălina Türkeș & Sorinel Căpuşneanu, 2020. "Assessing the Benefits of the Sustainability Reporting Practices in the Top Romanian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-31, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3470-:d:349772
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3470/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/8/3470/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rodrigo Lozano, 2015. "A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 32-44, January.
    2. Haina Shi & Xin Zhang & Jing Zhou, 2018. "Cross-listing and CSR performance: evidence from AH shares," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    3. Joonhyun Kim & Jinsoo Kim, 2018. "Corporate Sustainability Management and Its Market Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Chun Jiang & Qiang Fu, 2019. "A Win-Win Outcome between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Value: From the Perspective of Stakeholders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Davide Giacomini & Laura Rocca & Cristian Carini & Mario Mazzoleni, 2018. "Overcoming the Barriers to the Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Italian LGOs: Better Stick or Carrot?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Marian Socoliuc & Veronica Grosu & Elena Hlaciuc & Silvius Stanciu, 2018. "Analysis of Social Responsibility and Reporting Methods of Romanian Companies in the Countries of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-37, December.
    7. Mark Lang & Karl V. Lins & Mark Maffett, 2012. "Transparency, Liquidity, and Valuation: International Evidence on When Transparency Matters Most," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 50(3), pages 729-774, June.
    8. Mihai Korka, 2005. "Corporate Social Responsibility in Romania: From Theory to Practice," Transition Studies Review, Springer;Central Eastern European University Network (CEEUN), vol. 12(1), pages 47-57, July.
    9. Irina-Eugenia Iamandi, 2012. "Empirical Analysis on CSR Communication in Romania: Transparency and Participation," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 15(45), pages 25-50, December.
    10. Matthias S. Fifka & Maria Drabble, 2012. "Focus and Standardization of Sustainability Reporting – A Comparative Study of the United Kingdom and Finland," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(7), pages 455-474, November.
    11. Williams, Belinda & Wilmshurst, Trevor & Clift, Robert, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186.
    12. Yi An & Howard Davey & Harun Harun, 2017. "Sustainability Reporting at a New Zealand Public University: A Longitudinal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-11, August.
    13. Elena Dobre & Georgiana Oana Stanila & Laura Brad, 2015. "The Influence of Environmental and Social Performance on Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania’s Listed Entities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-41, March.
    14. Alamo Alexandre da Silva Batista & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2018. "Organizational Sustainability Practices: A Study of the Firms Listed by the Corporate Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Zhaojun Yang & Weihao Liu & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang, 2017. "Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-12, September.
    16. Grigorescu Adriana & Maer Matei Monica Mihaela & Mocanu Cristina & Zamfir Ana-Maria, 2019. "Key drivers and skills need for innovative companies focused on sustainability," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 717-727, May.
    17. Cristina Boţa-Avram & Adrian Groşanu & Paula-Ramona Răchişan & Marius Dan Gavriletea, 2018. "The Bidirectional Causality between Country-Level Governance, Economic Growth and Sustainable Development: A Cross-Country Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-24, February.
    18. Alena Kocmanová & Marie Pavláková Dočekalová & Stanislav Škapa & Lenka Širáňová, 2016. "Measuring Corporate Sustainability and Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance Value Added," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1, September.
    19. Belinda Williams & Trevor Wilmshurst & Robert Clift, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186, September.
    20. Martina Sukitsch & Sabrina Engert & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2015. "The Implementation of Corporate Sustainability in the European Automotive Industry: An Analysis of Sustainability Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-28, August.
    21. Wenxiu Hu & Jinzhu Du & Weiguo Zhang, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure and Innovation Sustainability: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jun Hyeok Choi & Saerona Kim & Dong-Hoon Yang & Kwanghee Cho, 2021. "Can Corporate Social Responsibility Decrease the Negative Influence of Financial Distress on Accounting Quality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Sorina Geanina Stanescu & Ion Cucui & Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Liliana Paschia & Mihaela Denisa Coman & Nicoleta Luminiţa Gudanescu Nicolau & Marilena Carmen Uzlau & Mihaela Leasa Lixandru, 2021. "Conceptual Model for Integrating Environmental Impact in Managerial Accounting Information Systems," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Isaac Monday Ikpor & Enrico Bracci & Clementina Iruka Kanu & Riccardo Ievoli & Benedette Okezie & Sunday Mlanga & Charles Ogbaekirigwe, 2022. "Drivers of Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in Emerging Economies: Evidence from Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.
    4. Mirela Panait & Irina Radulescu & Alina Brezoi, 2020. "Financial Markets – Under the Sign of CSR. Some Evidences Regarding Financial Education," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Adriana Grigorescu & Valentin Radu (ed.), 1st International Conference Global Ethics - Key of Sustainability (GEKoS), edition 1, volume 11, chapter 11, pages 96-106, Editura Lumen.
    5. Florina Pînzaru & Paul Dobrescu & Alexandra Vițelar & Ion Moldoveanu & Adina Săniuță, 2023. "Linking Sustainability-Driven Factors and Online Knowledge Sharing in Business: A PLS-SEM Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Wadhaah Ibrahim Almubarak & Kaouther Chebbi & Mohammed Abdullah Ammer, 2023. "Unveiling the Connection among ESG, Earnings Management, and Financial Distress: Insights from an Emerging Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-23, August.
    7. Adrian Neacsa & Mirela Panait & Jianu Daniel Muresan & Marian Catalin Voica, 2020. "Energy Poverty in European Union: Assessment Difficulties, Effects on the Quality of Life, Mitigation Measures. Some Evidences from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Graziella Sicoli & Pietro Iaquinta & Dominga Anna Ippolito, 2022. "The new frontiers of sustainable development and SDGS. A content analysis," RIEDS - Rivista Italiana di Economia, Demografia e Statistica - The Italian Journal of Economic, Demographic and Statistical Studies, SIEDS Societa' Italiana di Economia Demografia e Statistica, vol. 76(3), pages 17-28, July-Sept.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Delia-Mioara Popescu & Elena Anghel, 2020. "Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Ionica Oncioiu & Delia-Mioara Popescu & Elena Anghel & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu, 2020. "Online Company Reputation—A Thorny Problem for Optimizing Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Alamo Alexandre da Silva Batista & Antonio Carlos de Francisco, 2018. "Organizational Sustainability Practices: A Study of the Firms Listed by the Corporate Sustainability Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-13, January.
    4. Davide Giacomini & Paola Zola & Diego Paredi & Mario Mazzoleni, 2020. "Environmental disclosure and stakeholder engagement via social media: State of the art and potential in public utilities," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(4), pages 1552-1564, July.
    5. Ionica Oncioiu & Delia-Mioara Popescu & Anca Elena Aviana & Alina Șerban & Florica Rotaru & Mihai Petrescu & Andreea Marin-Pantelescu, 2020. "The Role of Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure in Financial Transparency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    6. Marian Socoliuc & Veronica Grosu & Elena Hlaciuc & Silvius Stanciu, 2018. "Analysis of Social Responsibility and Reporting Methods of Romanian Companies in the Countries of the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-37, December.
    7. Mădălina Dumitru & Justyna Dyduch & Raluca-Gina Gușe & Joanna Krasodomska, 2017. "Corporate Reporting Practices in Poland and Romania – An Ex-ante Study to the New Non-financial Reporting European Directive," Accounting in Europe, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 279-304, September.
    8. Enrico Bracci & Mouhcine Tallaki, 2013. "Socio-environmental reporting trends in the Italian local government: Thrive or wither?," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(2), pages 27-46.
    9. Thomas A. Tsalis & Maria Terzaki & Dimitrios Koulouriotis & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2023. "The nexus of United Nations' 2030 Agenda and corporate sustainability reports," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 784-796, April.
    10. Ionica Oncioiu & Anca-Gabriela Petrescu & Florentina-Raluca Bîlcan & Marius Petrescu & Melinda Timea Fülöp & Dan Ioan Topor, 2020. "The Influence of Corporate Governance Systems on a Company’s Market Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Francisco J. Alcaraz-Quiles & Andrés Navarro-Galera & David Ortiz-Rodríguez, 2020. "The contribution of the right to information laws in Europe to local government transparency on sustainability," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 161-178, March.
    12. Philipp Haessler, 2020. "Strategic Decisions between Short-Term Profit and Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-31, September.
    13. Thaís Vieira Nunhes & Enzo Viviani Garcia & Maximilian Espuny & Vitor Homem de Mello Santos & Raine Isaksson & Otávio José de Oliveira, 2021. "Where to Go with Corporate Sustainability? Opening Paths for Sustainable Businesses through the Collaboration between Universities, Governments, and Organizations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-31, January.
    14. Vera Coutinho & Ana Rita Domingues & Sandra Caeiro & Marco Painho & Paula Antunes & Rui Santos & Nuno Videira & Richard M. Walker & Donald Huisingh & Tomás B. Ramos, 2018. "Employee‐Driven Sustainability Performance Assessment in Public Organisations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(1), pages 29-46, January.
    15. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    16. Davide Giacomini & Laura Rocca & Cristian Carini & Mario Mazzoleni, 2018. "Overcoming the Barriers to the Diffusion of Sustainability Reporting in Italian LGOs: Better Stick or Carrot?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Rodrigo Lozano, 2018. "Proposing a Definition and a Framework of Organisational Sustainability: A Review of Efforts and a Survey of Approaches to Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    18. Gloria Fiorani & Chiara Di Gerio, 2022. "Reporting University Performance through the Sustainable Development Goals of the 2030 Agenda: Lessons Learned from Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Cregård Anna & Sobis Iwona, 2017. "Dissemination of Environmental Information and its Effects on Stakeholders’ Decision-Making: A Comparative Study between Swedish and Polish Municipalities," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 9-47, December.
    20. Jan Alpenberg & Tomasz Wnuk-Pel & Amanda Henebäck, 2018. "Environmental Orientation in Swedish Local Governments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-21, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:8:p:3470-:d:349772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.