IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i22p9498-d445401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety Contributions, Events and Operating Context as Criteria in Safety Awards: A Case Study from a Large Organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Nektarios Karanikas

    (School of Public Health & Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, QLD 4051, Australia)

  • Solomon O. Obadimu

    (School of Engineering, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick V94 T9PX, Ireland)

  • Anastasios Plioutsias

    (School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Automotive Engineering, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry, Warwickshire CV1 5FB, UK)

Abstract

Although the value and impact of safety award programmes (SAPs) have been criticised in literature, various programmes still operate within and across industries to recognise safety achievements, motivate employees and organisations, promote participation in safety improvements and raise the overall profile of nominees. In our study, following the request of a large aviation organisation (LAO) already implementing a SAP based merely on rates of safety events and occurrences, we introduced an award scheme by including and balancing safety positives and negatives as per the suggestions of contemporary safety thinking. The new SAP was based on the existing safety management system of the organisation and the data already available, included contributions to safety and considered differences in the context nominees operated along with lagging indicators. The pilot implementation of the new programme resulted in remarkable differences from the results obtained via the previous award scheme, a finding that satisfied management. Nonetheless, difficulties relating to the inadequate understanding of the new SAP by the targeted nominees and inconsistencies in the recording of data across the organisation led to the suspension of the programme after its first launch. Due to its limitations, this study does not recommend a safety awards standard for the industry. However, its methodological approach, the concepts embraced and the difficulties encountered could be considered by any organisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Nektarios Karanikas & Solomon O. Obadimu & Anastasios Plioutsias, 2020. "Safety Contributions, Events and Operating Context as Criteria in Safety Awards: A Case Study from a Large Organisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9498-:d:445401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9498/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/22/9498/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. M. Tam & Ivan Fung, 1998. "Effectiveness of safety management strategies on safety performance in Hong Kong," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 49-55.
    2. Rolf W. Habbel, 2002. "The Human Factor," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-51048-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng Guo & Junwu Wang & Denghui Liu & Yinghui Song, 2021. "Evolutionary Process of Promoting Construction Safety Education to Avoid Construction Safety Accidents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Ping Yung, 2009. "Institutional arrangements and construction safety in China: an empirical examination," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(5), pages 439-450.
    3. Tomasz Małysa & Bożena Gajdzik, 2020. "Predictive Models of Accidents at Work in the Steel Sector as a Framework for Sustainable Safety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Subhash Kundu & Bhawana Yadav & Anshul Yadav, 2016. "Effects of Safety Climate, Safety Attitude, and Safety Performance on Firm Performance: A Study of an Automobile Firm," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(12), pages 135-135, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:22:p:9498-:d:445401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.