IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i20p8323-d425659.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context

Author

Listed:
  • Olufunke P. Adebayo

    (Department of Business Management, College of Management & Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota 112212, Nigeria)

  • Rowland E. Worlu

    (Department of Business Management, College of Management & Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota 112212, Nigeria)

  • Chinonye L. Moses

    (Department of Business Management, College of Management & Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota 112212, Nigeria)

  • Olaleke O. Ogunnaike

    (Department of Business Management, College of Management & Social Sciences, Covenant University, Ota 112212, Nigeria)

Abstract

To remain competitive within the present inherent business environment, there is a demand for organisations to embrace an integrated culture-behaviour for performance that enables them to adopt a critical engine for a more sustainable working environment. Organisational culture, which is a reflection of predominant valued beliefs, is expected to influence a sustainable environmental performance. Evidence abounds of several organisational activities with adverse impacts on humans and the environment. The study examines an organisation’s processes that can be incorporated as a culture to ensure a more sustainable working environment. This paper proposes the use of six organisational culture practices (core value, reporting system, task performance, clarity of roles, careful deliberations, and distinctive identity) to find out organisation values, as well as individual preferences in enhancing an immediate sustainable environment. The study selected 480 employees of Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCGs) firms who are active in their organisational work processes; 358 responded, and as such, was deemed as a valid research sample. The empirical analysis was carried out using a variance-based Structural Equation Modelling with partial least squares for the path-modelling (PLS-SEM), both for the Algorithm Model, and the Bootstrapping Model with β and p -values obtained from the findings. The findings provide empirical evidence that there is a significant level of influence of organisational culture on environmental performance. However, among the organisational practices, task performance has the least influence on environmental performance. This implies that organisations should invest more in the dimensions of organisational culture with higher performance-importance, while adequate attention should be given to variables with the least influence on the target construct of environmental performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Olufunke P. Adebayo & Rowland E. Worlu & Chinonye L. Moses & Olaleke O. Ogunnaike, 2020. "An Integrated Organisational Culture for Sustainable Environmental Performance in the Nigerian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8323-:d:425659
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/20/8323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Benjamin Van Rooij & Adam Fine, 2018. "Toxic Corporate Culture: Assessing Organizational Processes of Deviancy," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-38, June.
    2. Humaira Mujib, 2017. "Organizational Identity: An Ambiguous Concept in Practical Terms," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-30, August.
    3. Uchenna Efobi & Tanankem Belmondo & Emmanuel Orkoh & Scholastica N. Atata & Opeyemi Akinyemi & Ibukun Beecroft, 2018. "Environmental Pollution Policy of Small Businesses in Nigeria and Ghana: Extent and Impact," Research Africa Network Working Papers 18/050, Research Africa Network (RAN).
    4. Hussain Bakhsh Magsi & Tze San Ong & Jo Ann Ho & Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh Hassan, 2018. "Organizational Culture and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Kevin Baird & Sophia Su & Amy Tung, 2018. "Organizational Culture and Environmental Activity Management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 403-414, March.
    6. Camelia-Daniela Hategan & Nicoleta Sirghi & Ruxandra-Ioana Curea-Pitorac & Vasile-Petru Hategan, 2018. "Doing Well or Doing Good: The Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profit in Romanian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Maiju Kangas & Muel Kaptein & Mari Huhtala & Anna-Maija Lämsä & Pia Pihlajasaari & Taru Feldt, 2018. "Why Do Managers Leave Their Organization? Investigating the Role of Ethical Organizational Culture in Managerial Turnover," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 707-723, December.
    8. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, 2020. "Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture: Its Essence and a Concept for Its Operationalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Linnenluecke, Martina K. & Griffiths, Andrew, 2010. "Corporate sustainability and organizational culture," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 357-366, October.
    10. Viktoria Ali Taha & Michaela Sirkova & Martina Ferencova, 2016. "The Impact Of Organizational Culture On Creativity And Innovation," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 14(1), pages 7-17, December.
    11. Pham Nhat Tan & Phan Quyen Phu Thi & Tučková Zuzana & Vo Nga & Nguyen Lien H.L., 2018. "Enhancing the organizational citizenship behavior for the environment: the roles of green training and organizational culture," Management & Marketing, Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 1174-1189, December.
    12. Chiou, Tzu-Yun & Chan, Hing Kai & Lettice, Fiona & Chung, Sai Ho, 2011. "The influence of greening the suppliers and green innovation on environmental performance and competitive advantage in Taiwan," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 822-836.
    13. Alisa Delic & Senija Nuhanovic, 2010. "The Organizational Structure and Organizational Culture Interdependence Analysis with a Special Reference to Bosnian and Herzegovinian Enterprises," Economic Analysis, Institute of Economic Sciences, vol. 43(3-4), pages 70-86.
    14. Tracy H. Porter & Vickie Coleman Gallagher & Diane Lawong, 2016. "The greening of organizational culture: revisited fifteen years later," American Journal of Business, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(4), pages 206-226, October.
    15. W. A. Srisathan & C. Ketkaew & P. Naruetharadhol, 2020. "The intervention of organizational sustainability in the effect of organizational culture on open innovation performance: A case of thai and chinese SMEs," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1717408-171, January.
    16. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Corporate culture, environmental innovation and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1368-1375, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Riccardo Gianluigi Serio & Maria Michela Dickson & Diego Giuliani & Giuseppe Espa, 2020. "Green Production as a Factor of Survival for Innovative Startups: Evidence from Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Małgorzata Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek & Katarzyna Antosz & Ryszard Wyczółkowski & Małgorzata Sławińska, 2022. "Integrated Approach for Safety Culture Factor Evaluation from a Sustainability Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-30, September.
    3. Carlos Fernandez-Jardon & Xavier Martinez-Cobas & Fabian Martinez-Ortiz, 2020. "Technology and Culture in Subsistence Small Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Pantelis C. Kostis, 2021. "Culture, innovation, and economic development," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. André Luiz Romano & Luis Miguel D. F. Ferreira, 2023. "How to transform sustainability practices into organizational benefits? The role of different cultural characteristics," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 192-208, March.
    2. Mert Gürlek & Muharrem Tuna, 2018. "Reinforcing competitive advantage through green organizational culture and green innovation," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(7-8), pages 467-491, June.
    3. Sebastjan Lazar & Vojko Potočan & Dorota Klimecka-Tatar & Matevz Obrecht, 2022. "Boosting Sustainable Operations with Sustainable Supply Chain Modeling: A Case of Organizational Culture and Normative Commitment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-23, September.
    4. Chulin Pan & Yufeng Jiang & Mingliang Wang & Shuang Xu & Ming Xu & Yixin Dong, 2021. "How Can Agricultural Corporate Build Sustainable Competitive Advantage through Green Intellectual Capital? A New Environmental Management Approach to Green Agriculture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Lu Zheng & Konstantinos Iatridis, 2022. "Friends or foes? A systematic literature review and meta‐analysis of the relationship between eco‐innovation and firm performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1838-1855, May.
    6. Ayça Kubra Hizarci‐Payne & İlayda İpek & Gülüzar Kurt Gümüş, 2021. "How environmental innovation influences firm performance: A meta‐analytic review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1174-1190, February.
    7. Eun-Jung Woo & Eungoo Kang, 2021. "Employee Environmental Capability and Its Relationship with Corporate Culture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Hartmann, Julia & Inkpen, Andrew & Ramaswamy, Kannan, 2022. "An FsQCA exploration of multiple paths to ecological innovation adoption in European transportation," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    9. Helena Bulińska-Stangrecka & Anna Bagieńska, 2021. "Culture-Based Green Workplace Practices as a Means of Conserving Energy and Other Natural Resources in the Manufacturing Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    10. Nikolaos S. Trevlopoulos & Thomas A. Tsalis & Konstantinos I. Evangelinos & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis & Konstantinos I. Vatalis & Ioannis E. Nikolaou, 2021. "The influence of environmental regulations on business innovation, intellectual capital, environmental and economic performance," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 163-178, March.
    11. Zhanna Mingaleva & Elena Shironina & Elena Lobova & Vasiliy Olenev & Lyubov Plyusnina & Anna Oborina, 2022. "Organizational Culture Management as an Element of Innovative and Sustainable Development of Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-28, May.
    12. Olivera Simovic & Miha Lesjak & Đurđica Perović & Eva Podovšovnik, 2023. "Measuring Organizational Culture in Hotels, Restaurants and Travel Agencies in Montenegro," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-25, February.
    13. Hussain Bakhsh Magsi & Tze San Ong & Jo Ann Ho & Ahmad Fahmi Sheikh Hassan, 2018. "Organizational Culture and Environmental Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Daniel Metz & Liviu Ilieș & Răzvan Liviu Nistor, 2020. "The Impact of Organizational Culture on Customer Service Effectiveness from a Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, August.
    15. Xuemei Xie & Qiwei Zhu & Ruoyi Wang, 2019. "Turning green subsidies into sustainability: How green process innovation improves firms' green image," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(7), pages 1416-1433, November.
    16. Katarzyna Piwowar-Sulej, 2020. "Pro-Environmental Organizational Culture: Its Essence and a Concept for Its Operationalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    18. Papen, Marie-Christin & Magalhaes, Katrin Marques & Tenbrock, Sebastian & Märkel, Christian, 2022. "Digitalisierungsanwendungen und Identifikation von Digitalisierungstrends im Mittelstand," WIK Discussion Papers 495, WIK Wissenschaftliches Institut für Infrastruktur und Kommunikationsdienste GmbH.
    19. Yan Zhou & Xin-Tong Lin & Zhi-Ping Fan & Kar-Hung Wong, 2022. "Remanufacturing Strategy Choice of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Considering Carbon Emission Trading, Green Innovation, and Green Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-42, June.
    20. Tatiana Dănescu & Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean & Maria-Alexandra Popa & Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:20:p:8323-:d:425659. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.