IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i19p8064-d421853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Factors Determine the Value of an Online Teacher Education Experience from a Teacher’s Perspective?

Author

Listed:
  • Moussa Boumadan

    (Faculty of Language and Education, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Roberto Soto-Varela

    (Faculty of Language and Education, Universidad Antonio de Nebrija, 28015 Madrid, Spain)

  • Myriam Ortiz-Padilla

    (Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Barranquilla 080005, Colombia)

  • César Poyatos-Dorado

    (Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

E-learning is currently at the center of interest in the educational community, in a situation of global pandemics that forces us to reduce attendance in all aspects of our lives. Online courses have had a bad reputation due to the distance between the tutor and the apprentice and the high dropout rates. The main purpose is to analyze the evaluations made by teachers on different features of a course, by examining variables like content, technology, activities, final work, and format. The analysis covers the 50 online courses that form part of the continuous training offer of the Regional Ministry of Education of the Community of Madrid in courses 17–18 and 18–19 in which 7501 teachers have participated. The opinion of each participant is collected from a questionnaire at the end of the training activity. This has been validated by a group of experts from the Regional Centre for Innovation and Training, belonging to the Community of Madrid, using the Delphi method. To develop the methodology, a linear multivariate model was calculated on the independent variables and the dependent variable Net Promoter Score (NPS). Most of the findings are related to two central variables in the educational approaches that occur in digital scenarios. What the group of teachers’ values most is the content of the proposal, while the factor that they consider least important is the technology that supports the development of the course. The rest of the variables analyzed have little impact on the recommendation of the courses. Nevertheless, conclusions suggest that combining factors such as content, technology, and pedagogy are essential in experiences like these.

Suggested Citation

  • Moussa Boumadan & Roberto Soto-Varela & Myriam Ortiz-Padilla & César Poyatos-Dorado, 2020. "What Factors Determine the Value of an Online Teacher Education Experience from a Teacher’s Perspective?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8064-:d:421853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/19/8064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melchor Gómez-García & Luis Matosas-López & Julio Ruiz-Palmero, 2020. "Social Networks Use Patterns among University Youth: The Validity and Reliability of an Updated Measurement Instrument," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduard Edelhauser & Lucian Lupu-Dima, 2021. "One Year of Online Education in COVID-19 Age, a Challenge for the Romanian Education System," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-32, July.
    2. Manuel Alejandro Betancourt-Odio & Andresa Sartor-Harada & Oscar Ulloa-Guerra & Juliana Azevedo-Gomes, 2021. "Self-Perceptions on Digital Competences for M-Learning and Education Sustainability: A Study with Teachers from Different Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge Lorenzo Calvo & Jorge García-González & Monica Flo García & Daniel Mon-López, 2020. "Development and Validation of a Well-Being Measure on Young Basketball Players: The NFAPW Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-12, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:19:p:8064-:d:421853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.