IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p5109-d375330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting Sustainable Development of Cultural Assets by Improving Users’ Perception through Space Configuration; Case Study: The Industrial Heritage Site

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Bazazzadeh

    (Division of History, Theory and Heritage, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Adam Nadolny

    (Division of History, Theory and Heritage, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 60-965 Poznan, Poland)

  • Koorosh Attarian

    (Faculty of Architecture, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful 64616-18674, Iran)

  • Behnaz Safar ali najar

    (Faculty of Architecture, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful 64616-18674, Iran)

  • Seyedeh sara Hashemi safaei

    (Faculty of Architecture, Jundi-Shapur University of Technology, Dezful 64616-18674, Iran)

Abstract

The role of the cultural assets as one of the pillars of sustainable development is undeniably of great significance in the cultural sustainability of cities. Indeed, the way users understand and interpret cultural heritage sites would be highly critical to managing cultural organizations properly. It means by improving users’ perception of these sites, it can expect a fair distribution of comprehensive awareness among generations about the values of cultural assets. Past studies in spatial psychology have demonstrated that environmental properties can positively Influence human emotions. On the other hand, using computational–mathematical methods used to examine spatio-visual properties have rarely been compared to human perceptions. This paper examines the impact of spatio-visual properties on human perception as a clever cultural management strategy to promote cultural sustainability. It is discussed how environmental features in general, and visibility in particular, can shape the way users interpret cultural heritage. Results indicate that not only visibility of users’ paths within cultural heritage sites can be an influential factor for the development of users’ perception, but also the visibility of the entrance of these complexes can change their understanding. This means that decision-makers, architects, and managers of the cultural organizations can apply these findings as cultural management framework by defining predefined paths in these sites in the way that they possess high visibility and visible entrance. Consequently, the distribution of public awareness among generations can be improved to strengthen the role of cultural aspects in sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Bazazzadeh & Adam Nadolny & Koorosh Attarian & Behnaz Safar ali najar & Seyedeh sara Hashemi safaei, 2020. "Promoting Sustainable Development of Cultural Assets by Improving Users’ Perception through Space Configuration; Case Study: The Industrial Heritage Site," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5109-:d:375330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5109/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5109/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clio Kenterelidou & Fani Galatsopoulou, 2021. "Sustainable Biocultural Heritage Management and Communication: The Case of Digital Narrative for UNESCO Marine World Heritage of Outstanding Universal Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    2. Hawar Himdad J. Sektani & Mahmood Khayat & Masi Mohammadi & Ana Pereira Roders, 2021. "Erbil City Built Heritage and Wellbeing: An Assessment of Local Perceptions Using the Semantic Differential Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Leo Bockelmann, 2023. "Impacts of Change: Analysing the Perception of Industrial Heritage in the Vogtland Region," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 30-38.
    4. Antonio Costanzo & Donatella Ebolese & Silvestro Antonio Ruffolo & Sergio Falcone & Carmelo la Piana & Mauro Francesco La Russa & Massimo Musacchio & Maria Fabrizia Buongiorno, 2020. "Detection of the TiO 2 Concentration in the Protective Coatings for the Cultural Heritage by Means of Hyperspectral Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Elena Gorbenkova & Elena Shcherbina, 2020. "Historical-Genetic Features in Rural Settlement System: A Case Study from Mogilev District (Mogilev Oblast, Belarus)," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Tomas Kačerauskas & Dalia Streimikiene & Rasa Bartkute, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability of Creative Economy: Evidence from a Lithuanian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Francesca Di Turo & Laura Medeghini, 2021. "How Green Possibilities Can Help in a Future Sustainable Conservation of Cultural Heritage in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Carlos J. Pardo Abad, 2020. "Valuation of Industrial Heritage in Terms of Sustainability: Some Cases of Tourist Reference in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-23, November.
    6. Luigi Petti & Claudia Trillo & Busisiwe Ncube Makore, 2020. "Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development Targets: A Possible Harmonisation? Insights from the European Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Saja Kosanović & Branislav Folić & Stefan Kovačević & Ivana Nikolić & Ljubiša Folić, 2019. "A Study on the Sustainability of the Traditional Sirinić Houses in the Šar Mountain Region, the South-Western Balkans," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    8. Gül Aktürk & Ahmadreza Shirvani Dastgerdi, 2021. "Cultural Landscapes under the Threat of Climate Change: A Systematic Study of Barriers to Resilience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Tiziano Cattaneo & Emanuele Giorgi & Mauricio Flores & Viviana Barquero, 2020. "Territorial Effects of Shared-Living Heritage Regeneration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-28, October.
    10. Aspasia E. Fafouti & Anastasia Vythoulka & Ekaterini T. Delegou & Nikolaos Farmakidis & Maria Ioannou & Komninos Perellis & Antonis Giannikouris & Nikolaos A. Kampanis & George Alexandrakis & Antonia , 2023. "Designing Cultural Routes as a Tool of Responsible Tourism and Sustainable Local Development in Isolated and Less Developed Islands: The Case of Symi Island in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-39, August.
    11. Marko Nikolić & Boško Drobnjak & Irena Kuletin Ćulafić, 2020. "The Possibilities of Preservation, Regeneration and Presentation of Industrial Heritage: The Case of Old Mint “A.D.” on Belgrade Riverfront," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-36, June.
    12. Luigi Fusco Girard & Francesca Nocca, 2019. "Moving Towards the Circular Economy/City Model: Which Tools for Operationalizing This Model?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-48, November.
    13. F.J. Cristófol & Elena Cruz-Ruiz & Gorka Zamarreño-Aramendia, 2021. "Transmission of Place Branding Values through Experiential Events: Wine BC Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, March.
    14. Wei Ren & Feng Han, 2018. "Indicators for Assessing the Sustainability of Built Heritage Attractions: An Anglo-Chinese Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-28, July.
    15. Daniele Dabbene & Carla Bartolozzi & Cristina Coscia, 2022. "How to Monitor and Evaluate Quality in Adaptive Heritage Reuse Projects from a Well-Being Perspective: A Proposal for a Dashboard Model of Indicators to Support Promoters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-32, June.
    16. Tris Kee & Kwong Wing Chau, 2020. "Adaptive reuse of heritage architecture and its external effects on sustainable built environment—Hedonic pricing model and case studies in Hong Kong," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1597-1608, November.
    17. Romero-Castro, N. & López-Cabarcos, M.A. & Piñeiro-Chousa, J., 2023. "Finance, technology, and values: A configurational approach to the analysis of rural entrepreneurship," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    18. Paul Okello Atieno & George N Mose & Nicholas K. Ombachi, 2021. "Social Cohesion Heritage and Self-Help Groups on Sustainable Livelihoods among Households in Nyakach Sub-County, Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 5(11), pages 482-491, November.
    19. Martina Bosone & Francesca Ciampa, 2021. "Human-Centred Indicators (HCI) to Regenerate Vulnerable Cultural Heritage and Landscape towards a Circular City: From the Bronx (NY) to Ercolano (IT)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-36, May.
    20. Hokyung Chung & Jongoh Lee, 2019. "Community Cultural Resources as Sustainable Development Enablers: A Case Study on Bukjeong Village in Korea compared with Naoshima Island in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-14, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5109-:d:375330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.