IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i12p5036-d373842.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Italian Social Farming: the Network of Coldiretti and Campagna Amica

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Moruzzo

    (Department of Veterinary Science—Rural Economics Section, University of Pisa, Viale Delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Francesco Riccioli

    (Department of Veterinary Science—Rural Economics Section, University of Pisa, Viale Delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Angela Galasso

    (ARB Agriculture Rural Brokers 2, Via della Ferratella in Laterano 7, 00184 Roma, Italy)

  • Carmelo Troccoli

    (Campagna Amica, Coldiretti, Via Nazionale 89/a, 00184 Roma, Italy)

  • Salomon Espinosa Diaz

    (Department of Veterinary Science—Rural Economics Section, University of Pisa, Viale Delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

  • Francesco Di Iacovo

    (Department of Veterinary Science—Rural Economics Section, University of Pisa, Viale Delle Piagge 2, 56124 Pisa, Italy)

Abstract

For the last ten years, Social farming (SF) has become an innovative practice able to connect multifunctional agriculture and novel social services for urban and rural areas in Italy and the EU. By looking at the experience from Italy, it is possible to note that SF has not developed homogeneously along the national territory. It is characterized by a wide range of practices and activities related to the development of a welfare in which several topics such as subsidiarity, the value of relationship, and co-production find multiple meanings and applications. This paper provides a further contribution to the knowledge on this type of activity and opens the way to deeper considerations on the topic. The information reported in this study refers to a project born in 2018 and carried out by Fondazione Campagna Amica, a foundation promoted by Coldiretti, the main organization of agricultural entrepreneurs in Italy. This paper focuses on the analysis of data collected during this project, through in-depth interviews carried out from July 2018 to March 2019 among 229 agricultural enterprises, as well as meetings with representatives of the regional offices of Coldiretti that are involved in SF. This study aims to reach a better understanding of the development of SF in Italy through the perspective of a national network of farmers and to compare SF practices across regions in order to examine their similarities and differences. The most important results show big individual farms with a great variety of agricultural activities and livestock systems, with a clear predominance of horticulture. These SF farms mainly provide direct sales and educational activities and are involved in training and job placement services.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Moruzzo & Francesco Riccioli & Angela Galasso & Carmelo Troccoli & Salomon Espinosa Diaz & Francesco Di Iacovo, 2020. "Italian Social Farming: the Network of Coldiretti and Campagna Amica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5036-:d:373842
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5036/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/12/5036/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davide D?Angelo & Saverio Senni, 2017. "Social farming and the recent national regulation: An exploratory survey," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 19(2), pages 261-274.
    2. Roberta Moruzzo & Francesco Di Iacovo & Alessandra Funghi & Paola Scarpellini & Salomon Espinosa Diaz & Francesco Riccioli, 2019. "Social Farming: An Inclusive Environment Conducive to Participant Personal Growth," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Ivana Bassi & Federico Nassivera & Lucia Piani, 2016. "Social farming: a proposal to explore the effects of structural and relational variables on social farm results," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Annapia Ferrara & Concetta Ferrara & Sabrina Tomasi & Gigliola Paviotti & Giovanna Bertella & Alessio Cavicchi, 2023. "Exploring the Potential of Social Farmers’ Networking as a Leverage for Inclusive Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    2. Agata Nicolosi & Valentina Rosa Laganà & Donatella Di Gregorio & Donatella Privitera, 2021. "Social Farming in the Virtuous System of the Circular Economy. An Exploratory Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    3. Roberta Moruzzo & Giulia Granai & Caterina De Benedictis & Morgana Galardi & Vincenzina Colosimo & Jacopo Sforzi & Francesco Di Iacovo, 2022. "The Development of Sustainable Social Farming in Italy: A Case Studies Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    4. Adro, Francisco do & Franco, Mário, 2020. "Rural and agri-entrepreneurial networks: A qualitative case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fazari, Erika & Musolino, Dario, 2022. "Social farming in high mountain regions: The case of the Aosta Valley in Italy," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 24(3), December.
    2. Angela Genova & Martina Maccaroni & Elena Viganò, 2020. "Social Farming: Heterogeneity in Social and Agricultural Relationships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Francesca Giarè & Gabriella Ricciardi & Patrizia Borsotto, 2020. "Migrants Workers and Processes of Social Inclusion in Italy: The Possibilities Offered by Social Farming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Antoni F. Tulla & Ana Vera & Carles Guirado & Natàlia Valldeperas, 2020. "The Return on Investment in Social Farming: A Strategy for Sustainable Rural Development in Rural Catalonia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-28, June.
    5. Roberta Moruzzo & Giulia Granai & Caterina De Benedictis & Morgana Galardi & Vincenzina Colosimo & Jacopo Sforzi & Francesco Di Iacovo, 2022. "The Development of Sustainable Social Farming in Italy: A Case Studies Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    6. Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato & Federico Nassivera & Maria Bugatti & Biancamaria Torquati, 2019. "Consumers Demand for Social Farming Products: An Analysis with Discrete Choice Experiments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, November.
    7. Erika Fazari & Dario Musolino, 2022. "Social farming in high mountain regions: The case of the Aosta Valley in Italy," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 24(3), pages 1-33.
    8. Patrizia Borsotto & Marco Gaito & Antonio Papaleo & Carmela De Vivo, 2019. "An exploratory study on the construction of networks in social farming," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 21(2), pages 481-506.
    9. Marta Borgi & Mario Marcolin & Paolo Tomasin & Cinzia Correale & Aldina Venerosi & Alberto Grizzo & Roberto Orlich & Francesca Cirulli, 2019. "Nature-Based Interventions for Mental Health Care: Social Network Analysis as a Tool to Map Social Farms and their Response to Social Inclusion and Community Engagement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:12:p:5036-:d:373842. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.