IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i4p1001-d206134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shades of Green: Life Cycle Assessment of a Urethane Methacrylate/Unsaturated Polyester Resin System for Composite Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathon M. Chard

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences (A1), University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH Surrey, UK
    Scott Bader Company Ltd., Wollaston, NN29 7RL Northamptonshire, UK)

  • Lauren Basson

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences (A1), University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH Surrey, UK)

  • Gavin Creech

    (Scott Bader Company Ltd., Wollaston, NN29 7RL Northamptonshire, UK)

  • David A. Jesson

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences (A1), University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH Surrey, UK)

  • Paul A. Smith

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering Sciences, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences (A1), University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH Surrey, UK)

Abstract

Bio-derived fibres and resins are of increasing interest as alternatives to petrochemicals in the production of so-called environmentally friendly composite materials. However, whilst the majority of systems consider complete replacement, another route is to look at the constituents that are required to give certain properties, including the content of diluents; a third is to identify ‘hot spots’ in manufacturing. This paper considers these three possibilities in the context of the production of a resin system, and presents results from a life cycle assessment. The aim of this study was to make qualitative assertions based on quantitative estimates. The current work provides a practical assessment of the contribution of the manufacturing process of a multi-part resin formulation to a range of environmental impacts. As a part of this, a multi-stage methodology, the first of its kind, which is more relevant for the batch processes used to manufacture many structural thermosetting polymer systems, was developed. This was applied to a range of resins, some of which include bio-mass derived precursors. For the boundary conditions used, the indications are that the impacts due to taking the constituents and processing them to produce the resin system are insignificant compared with those due to producing the feedstocks in the first place. Surprisingly, whether the feedstocks were from fossil resources or were bioderived was of little significance. As a consequence of the analysis, it has been demonstrated that whilst a manufacturer can make significant savings through careful management of plant and the supporting energy mix, significant improvements to the environmental impacts of resin systems can be made through the choice of particular monomers.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathon M. Chard & Lauren Basson & Gavin Creech & David A. Jesson & Paul A. Smith, 2019. "Shades of Green: Life Cycle Assessment of a Urethane Methacrylate/Unsaturated Polyester Resin System for Composite Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1001-:d:206134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1001/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/1001/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Amy Fitzgerald & Will Proud & Ali Kandemir & Richard J. Murphy & David A. Jesson & Richard S. Trask & Ian Hamerton & Marco L. Longana, 2021. "A Life Cycle Engineering Perspective on Biocomposites as a Solution for a Sustainable Recovery," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, January.
    2. Djoko Setyanto & Yohanes Adeatma Antonio & Marten Darmawan & Ubaidillah Ubaidillah, 2022. "A Novel Z Profile of Pultruded Glass-Fibre-Reinforced Polymer Beams for Purlins," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-17, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:4:p:1001-:d:206134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.