IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i2p490-d198760.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Assessment in Neotropical Watersheds: A Multi-Factorial Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Elaine F. Celestino

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação nível Doutorado em Recursos Pesqueiros e Engenharia de Pesca, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, 85903-000 Paraná, Brazil)

  • Leandro F. Celestino

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação nível Doutorado em Recursos Pesqueiros e Engenharia de Pesca, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, 85903-000 Paraná, Brazil)

  • Jhony F. M. da Silva

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação nível Doutorado em Recursos Pesqueiros e Engenharia de Pesca, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, 85903-000 Paraná, Brazil)

  • Elaine A. L. Kashiwaqui

    (Grupo de Estudos em Ciências Ambientais e Educação, Universidade Estadual de Mato Grosso do Sul, 79980-000 Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil)

  • Maristela C. Makrakis

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Pesqueiros e Engenharia de Pesca, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, 85903-000 Paraná, Brazil)

  • Sergio Makrakis

    (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Pesqueiros e Engenharia de Pesca, Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, 85903-000 Paraná, Brazil)

Abstract

This study evaluated the environmental conditions of two watersheds selected on the basis of similarities in land use. The environmental conditions of the watersheds were analyzed using two geoprocessing methods and in situ evaluations by applying the rapid assessment protocol (RAP). Geospatial image processing was used to analyze land use, slope, soil classification, and rainfall, while RAP was used to evaluate the connectivity and size of riparian corridors. The results revealed varied uses of land with the landscape matrix in both watersheds, composed of agriculture, pasture, and urban centers. Urban centers were defined as spots and riparian zones as corridors. The analysis of environmental fragility considering all the geospatial variables, classified both watersheds as having medium fragility. The most fragile sites were the urban centers, which had a high slope and degraded riparian zone. Onsite assessments have shown that corridors do not have the size required by legislation; they are fragmented and unstructured, and they contain exotic species. We also propose that a multi-factorial approach be used to evaluate watersheds, associating geospatial assessments and onsite analyses that consider the limitations pointed out in each protocol. This reduces sampling errors and shows the actual state of conservation in riparian zones.

Suggested Citation

  • Elaine F. Celestino & Leandro F. Celestino & Jhony F. M. da Silva & Elaine A. L. Kashiwaqui & Maristela C. Makrakis & Sergio Makrakis, 2019. "Environmental Assessment in Neotropical Watersheds: A Multi-Factorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:490-:d:198760
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/2/490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lazdinis, Marius & Angelstam, Per, 2005. "Functionality of riparian forest ecotones in the context of former Soviet Union and Swedish forest management histories," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 321-332, March.
    2. Olexandr Nekhay & Manuel Arriaza, 2016. "How Attractive Is Upland Olive Groves Landscape? Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and GIS in Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Shanshan Xu & Qinghe Zhao & Shengyan Ding & Mingzhou Qin & Lixin Ning & Xiaoyu Ji, 2018. "Improving Soil and Water Conservation of Riparian Vegetation Based on Landscape Leakiness and Optimal Vegetation Pattern," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateusz Hämmerling & Joanna Kocięcka & Stanisław Zaborowski, 2021. "AHP as a Useful Tool in the Assessment of the Technical Condition of Hydrotechnical Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-26, January.
    2. ChunJiang Su & Junfeng Sun & Wanze Zhu & Li Peng, 2018. "History, Distribution, and Potential of the Olive Industry in China: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    3. Åsa Davidsson & Magnus Johansson & Carl Bonander, 2021. "Desirable Effects from Disturbance Ecology—A Paradox within Conservation Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Nordberg, Mats, 2007. "Ukraine reforms in forestry 1990-2000," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(6), pages 713-729, February.
    5. Ta-Ching Liang & Szu-Hsien Peng, 2017. "Using Analytic Hierarchy Process to Examine the Success Factors of Autonomous Landscape Development in Rural Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Guidotti, Vinicius & Ferraz, Silvio Frosini de Barros & Pinto, Luis Fernando Guedes & Sparovek, Gerd & Taniwaki, Ricardo H. & Garcia, Lara Gabrielle & Brancalion, Pedro H.S., 2020. "Changes in Brazil’s Forest Code can erode the potential of riparian buffers to supply watershed services," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:2:p:490-:d:198760. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.