IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i21p6057-d282221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Product Segmentation and Sustainability in Customized Assembly with Respect to the Basic Elements of Industry 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Branislav Micieta

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Vladimira Binasova

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Radovan Lieskovsky

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Martin Krajcovic

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Luboslav Dulina

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Zilina, Univerzitná 8215/1, 010 26 Žilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Sustainable manufacturing is not just about manufacturing, but also products and services. In the area of custom production processes, there may also be circumstances of organizational management where compliance with labor productivity and the due-date principle is problematic. Similar products with different operating times cause the throughput of assembly lines to slow down, increase number of works in progress (WIP), and increase productivity waste. It is possible to reduce this impact through various productivity-enhancing methods and innovations. This paper presents an innovative approach to product segmentation in the assembly phase of custom manufacturing, and a proposal for a new segmentation procedure that will allow significantly better integration of products into existing assembly processes without negatively impacting the company’s production indicators. The scientific problem was defined on the basis that extending existing segmentation by the third dimension of operating times allows products in MTO (made to order) environments to be divided into families with approximately equal operating times. This will increase assembly efficiency in existing medium to large companies without large investments in the development and adaptation of assembly process products. The contributions of this work relate mainly to simple adaptations to existing processes in medium-sized businesses. The proposed solution respects the basic elements of Industry 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • Branislav Micieta & Vladimira Binasova & Radovan Lieskovsky & Martin Krajcovic & Luboslav Dulina, 2019. "Product Segmentation and Sustainability in Customized Assembly with Respect to the Basic Elements of Industry 4.0," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6057-:d:282221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/21/6057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Gašo & Martin Krajčovič & Ľuboslav Dulina & Patrik Grznár & Juraj Vaculík, 2019. "Methodology of Creating and Sustainable Applying of Stereoscopic Recording in the Industrial Engineering Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Martin Krajčovič & Viktor Hančinský & Ľuboslav Dulina & Patrik Grznár & Martin Gašo & Juraj Vaculík, 2019. "Parameter Setting for a Genetic Algorithm Layout Planner as a Toll of Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Patrik Grznár & Milan Gregor & Štefan Mozol & Martin Krajčovič & Ľuboslav Dulina & Martin Gašo & Michal Major, 2019. "A System to Determine the Optimal Work-in-Progress Inventory Stored in Interoperation Manufacturing Buffers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-36, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masood Fathi & Morteza Ghobakhloo, 2020. "Enabling Mass Customization and Manufacturing Sustainability in Industry 4.0 Context: A Novel Heuristic Algorithm for in-Plant Material Supply Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Viera Sukalova & Zuzana Stofkova & Jana Stofkova, 2022. "Human Resource Management in Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Andreas Felsberger & Gerald Reiner, 2020. "Sustainable Industry 4.0 in Production and Operations Management: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-39, September.
    4. Houyem Zrelli & Abdullah H. Alsharif & Iskander Tlili, 2020. "Malmquist Indexes of Productivity Change in Tunisian Manufacturing Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Jana Stofkova & Adela Poliakova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Matej Krejnus & Vladimira Binasova & Naqibullah Daneshjo, 2022. "Digital Skills as a Significant Factor of Human Resources Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Alonso-García & Ana García-Sánchez & Paula Jaén-Moreno & Manuel Fernández-Rubio, 2021. "Performance Analysis of Urban Cleaning Devices Using Human–Machine Interaction Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Seyed Morteza Alizadeh & Sakineh Sadeghipour & Cagil Ozansoy & Akhtar Kalam, 2020. "Developing a Mathematical Model for Wind Power Plant Siting and Sizing in Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-34, July.
    3. Carman K.M. Lee & Shuzhu Zhang & Kam K.H. Ng, 2019. "In-Plant Logistics Simulation Model for the Catering Service Industry Towards Sustainable Development: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-11, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:21:p:6057-:d:282221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.