IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i20p5565-d274764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Assessment Based on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Forms in Watershed Sediments: A Case Study of the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang Watershed

Author

Listed:
  • Hongmeng Ye

    (School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China
    Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Industrial Green Technology, College of Ecology and Resource Engineering of Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
    College of Environmental, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Hao Yang

    (School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Nian Han

    (College of Environmental, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Changchun Huang

    (School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Tao Huang

    (School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

  • Guoping Li

    (Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Industrial Green Technology, College of Ecology and Resource Engineering of Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China)

  • Xuyin Yuan

    (Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Industrial Green Technology, College of Ecology and Resource Engineering of Wuyi University, Wuyishan 354300, China
    College of Environmental, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China)

  • Hong Wang

    (School of Geography Science, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China)

Abstract

In order to achieve effective eutrophication control and ecosystem restoration, it is of great significance to investigate the distribution characteristics of nutrient elements in sediments, and to perform ecological risk assessments. In the current grading criteria for nutrient elements in sediments, only the overall or organic components of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus are considered, while the specific species distributions and bioavailability characteristics are rarely taken into account. Hence, using the current grading criteria, the differences in the release, migration and biological activity of nutrient elements in sediments cannot be accurately reflected. Taking the upper reaches of the Minjiang River watershed as an example, we analyzed the overall distributions and the ratio of nutrient elements in sediments, the spatial changes of nitrogen and phosphorus forms, the bioavailability, and the environmental significance. The ecological risk of nitrogen and phosphorus in sediments was assessed using an evaluation method based upon the biological effective parameter. The results were compared with the results of the evaluation methods based on the single pollution index, and then these evaluation methods were confirmed accordingly. From the results, the following conclusions can be obtained: (1) The spatial distributions of nutrient elements in sediments in the upper reaches of the Minjiang River Watershed (including the Jianxi Basin, Futunxi Basin, and Shaxi Basin) were significantly affected by the local ecology and the urban sewage discharge system. (2) The maximum average contents of total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) in sediments were observed in the Jianxi Basin, the Futunxi Basin and the Shaxi Basin, respectively. (3) According to the contents of nitrogen and phosphorus in sediments, the bioavailable nitrogen (TTN) accounted for 35.49% of the total contents of TN. The components of TTN can be sorted from high to low as follows: Nitrogen in organic sulfide form (SOEF-N) > nitrogen in iron-manganese oxide form (SAEF-N) > nitrogen in ion exchange form (IEF-N) > nitrogen in weak acid leaching form (WAEF-N). Inorganic phosphorus (IP) was the main component of TP. The components of IP can be sorted from high to low as follows: Metal oxide bound phosphorus (NaOH-P) > calcium bound phosphorus (HCl-P) > reduced phosphorus (BD-P) > weakly adsorbed phosphorus (NH 4 Cl-P). Meanwhile, bioavailable phosphorus (BAP, BAP = NH 4 Cl-P + BD-P + NaOH-P) accounted for 36.94% of TP. According to the results of the single pollution index method, the risk level of TOC pollution in the sediments was relatively low in the whole area, while the risk level of TN pollution was low or moderate in most zones, and severe in certain ones. The risk level of TP pollution was low to moderate. (4) From the results of the bioavailability index evaluation method, based on the total amounts and forms of N and P, the risk level of N pollution was moderate, while the risk of P pollution was negligible. In addition, the results of the bioavailability index evaluation method were more consistent with the actual situation and reflected the overall environmental effects of nitrogen and phosphorus.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongmeng Ye & Hao Yang & Nian Han & Changchun Huang & Tao Huang & Guoping Li & Xuyin Yuan & Hong Wang, 2019. "Risk Assessment Based on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Forms in Watershed Sediments: A Case Study of the Upper Reaches of the Minjiang Watershed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-21, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5565-:d:274764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/20/5565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. MichaƂ Fiedler, 2021. "The Effects of Land Use on Concentrations of Nutrients and Selected Metals in Bottom Sediments and the Risk Assessment for Rivers of the Warta River Catchment, Poland," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Zhongya Fan & Wencai Wang & Chunyan Tang & Yiping Li & Zhong Wang & Shu Lin & Fantang Zeng, 2019. "Targeting Remediation Dredging by Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Lake Sediment: A Case Study of Shitang Lake, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:20:p:5565-:d:274764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.