IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i9p3086-d166584.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Finding Common Ground between United Kingdom Based and Chinese Approaches to Earthen Heritage Conservation

Author

Listed:
  • Jenny Richards

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

  • Yinghong Wang

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

  • Scott A. Orr

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

  • Heather Viles

    (School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

Abstract

Earthen heritage is one of the oldest and universal forms of heritage but its conservation poses many challenges. Establishing international collaborations could provide an efficient, sustainable mechanism to increase knowledge exchange, aiding the development of earthen heritage conservation strategies around the world. However, perceived differences in how Eastern and Western countries value earthen heritage and develop conservation strategies can pose challenges for establishing collaborations. To understand these perceived differences and whether they hinder collaborations, this paper compares British and Chinese heritage conservation policy and practice and then reports the results from an innovative workshop examining the approaches of 13 Chinese and 13 UK based heritage experts and researchers towards earthen heritage conservation. Workshop participants undertook bilingual discussions and completed a co-created questionnaire available in English and Mandarin. Both groups identified historic value as the most important value and maintenance of authenticity and integrity, need for scientific research and site scale conservation as vital considerations for conservation strategies. This study found that to understand the potential for collaboration, individual perspectives need consideration as well as policies and practices. This innovative bilingual, discussion-based approach has potential to aid collaborations for diverse international issues from wildlife conservation to cross-boundary pollution and climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Jenny Richards & Yinghong Wang & Scott A. Orr & Heather Viles, 2018. "Finding Common Ground between United Kingdom Based and Chinese Approaches to Earthen Heritage Conservation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3086-:d:166584
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fang Han & Zhaoping Yang & Hui Shi & Qun Liu & Geoffrey Wall, 2016. "How to Promote Sustainable Relationships between Heritage Conservation and Community, Based on a Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-11, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qun Liu & Zhaoping Yang & Fang Wang, 2017. "Conservation Policy-Community Conflicts: A Case Study from Bogda Nature Reserve, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Lei Xiong & Cheng-Lein Teng & Bo-Wei Zhu & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng & Shan-Lin Huang, 2017. "Using the D-DANP-mV Model to Explore the Continuous System Improvement Strategy for Sustainable Development of Creative Communities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-37, October.
    3. Rie Nomura & Siyuan Shan & Suguru Mori, 2018. "Analyzing Spatial Structure of Traditional Houses in Old Towns with Tourism Development and Its Transformation toward Sustainable Development of Residential Environments in Hexia Old Town, in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Jiancheng Lu & Xiaolong Luo & Peigang Zhang, 2019. "Rights–Values–Interests: The Conflict between World Cultural Heritage and Community: A Case Study of the West Lake Cultural Landscape Heritage in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Doriana Dal Palù & Beatrice Lerma & Marco Bozzola & Claudia De Giorgi, 2018. "Merchandising as a Strategic Tool to Enhance and Spread Intangible Values of Cultural Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, June.
    6. Pierluigi De Berardinis & Marianna Rotilio & Luisa Capannolo, 2017. "Energy and Sustainable Strategies in the Renovation of Existing Buildings: An Italian Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-20, August.
    7. Andrea Gomez-Oliva & Joanna Alvarado-Uribe & Maria Concepcion Parra-Meroño & Antonio J. Jara, 2019. "Transforming Communication Channels to the Co-Creation and Diffusion of Intangible Heritage in Smart Tourism Destination: Creation and Testing in Ceutí (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-30, July.
    8. Hui Shi & Tiange Shi & Fang Han & Qin Liu & Zhi Wang & Hulan Zhao, 2019. "Conservation Value of World Natural Heritage Sites’ Outstanding Universal Value via Multiple Techniques—Bogda, Xinjiang Tianshan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-27, October.
    9. Shuyi Xie, 2019. "Learning from Italian Typology- and Morphology-Led Planning Techniques: A Planning Framework for Yingping, Xiamen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, March.
    10. Jonathan Liljeblad & Khin Thinn Thinn Oo, 2020. "World heritage sustainable development policy & local implementation: Site management issues using a case study of Sri Ksetra at Pyu ancient cities in Myanmar," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(3), pages 468-477, May.
    11. Olgica Grcheva & Beser Oktay Vehbi, 2021. "From Public Participation to Co-Creation in the Cultural Heritage Management Decision-Making Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:9:p:3086-:d:166584. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.