IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v7y2024i1p17-300d1352088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cumulative Histograms under Uncertainty: An Application to Dose–Volume Histograms in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Flavia Gesualdi

    (German Cancer Research Center—DKFZ, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    Institute for Astroparticle Physics (IAP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
    Instituto de Tecnologías en Detección y Astropartículas (Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de San Martín), Centro Atómico Constituyentes, San Martín B1650KNA, Argentina
    Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France)

  • Niklas Wahl

    (German Cancer Research Center—DKFZ, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

In radiotherapy treatment planning, the absorbed doses are subject to executional and preparational errors, which propagate to plan quality metrics. Accurately quantifying these uncertainties is imperative for improved treatment outcomes. One approach, analytical probabilistic modeling (APM), presents a highly computationally efficient method. This study evaluates the empirical distribution of dose–volume histogram points (a typical plan metric) derived from Monte Carlo sampling to quantify the accuracy of modeling uncertainties under different distribution assumptions, including Gaussian, log-normal, four-parameter beta, gamma, and Gumbel distributions. Since APM necessitates the bivariate cumulative distribution functions, this investigation also delves into approximations using a Gaussian or an Ali–Mikhail–Haq Copula. The evaluations are performed in a one-dimensional simulated geometry and on patient data for a lung case. Our findings suggest that employing a beta distribution offers improved modeling accuracy compared to a normal distribution. Moreover, the multivariate Gaussian model outperforms the Copula models in patient data. This investigation highlights the significance of appropriate statistical distribution selection in advancing the accuracy of uncertainty modeling in radiotherapy treatment planning, extending an understanding of the analytical probabilistic modeling capacities in this crucial medical domain.

Suggested Citation

  • Flavia Gesualdi & Niklas Wahl, 2024. "Cumulative Histograms under Uncertainty: An Application to Dose–Volume Histograms in Radiotherapy Treatment Planning," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:17-300:d:1352088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/1/17/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/7/1/17/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali, Mir M. & Mikhail, N. N. & Haq, M. Safiul, 1978. "A class of bivariate distributions including the bivariate logistic," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 405-412, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. F. Marta L. Di Lascio & Andrea Menapace & Roberta Pappadà, 2024. "A spatially‐weighted AMH copula‐based dissimilarity measure for clustering variables: An application to urban thermal efficiency," Environmetrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), February.
    2. Faugeras, Olivier P., 2009. "A quantile-copula approach to conditional density estimation," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 2083-2099, October.
    3. M. Vrac & L. Billard & E. Diday & A. Chédin, 2012. "Copula analysis of mixture models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 427-457, September.
    4. Mario Jovanovic, 2011. "Does Monetary Policy Affect Stock Market Uncertainty? – Empirical Evidence from the United States," Ruhr Economic Papers 0240, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    5. Koichi Hashizume & Jun Tshuchida & Takashi Sozu, 2022. "Flexible use of copula‐type model for dose‐finding in drug combination clinical trials," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(4), pages 1651-1661, December.
    6. Emmanuel Afuecheta & Saralees Nadarajah & Stephen Chan, 2021. "A Statistical Analysis of Global Economies Using Time Varying Copulas," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 58(4), pages 1167-1194, December.
    7. Yeshunying Wang & Chuancun Yin, 2021. "A New Class of Multivariate Elliptically Contoured Distributions with Inconsistency Property," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 1377-1407, December.
    8. Gunsilius, Florian F., 2023. "A condition for the identification of multivariate models with binary instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 220-238.
    9. repec:jss:jstsof:21:i04 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Xiaohu Li & Yinping You, 2014. "A note on allocation of portfolio shares of random assets with Archimedean copula," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 212(1), pages 155-167, January.
    11. Dalla Valle Luciana, 2016. "The Use of Official Statistics in Self-Selection Bias Modeling," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 32(4), pages 887-905, December.
    12. Saminger-Platz Susanne & Klement Erich Peter & Arias-García José De Jesús & Mesiar Radko, 2017. "Characterizations of bivariate conic, extreme value, and Archimax copulas," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 45-58, January.
    13. repec:zbw:rwirep:0240 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Enrique de Amo & María del Rosario Rodríguez-Griñolo & Manuel Úbeda-Flores, 2024. "Directional Dependence Orders of Random Vectors," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, January.
    15. Gouriéroux, Christian & Jouneau, F., 1994. "Multivariate distributions for limited dependent variable models," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Couverture Orange) 9414, CEPREMAP.
    16. Jovanović, Mario, 2011. "Does Monetary Policy Affect Stock Market Uncertainty? – Empirical Evidence from the United States," Ruhr Economic Papers 240, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Yan, Jun, 2007. "Enjoy the Joy of Copulas: With a Package copula," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 21(i04).
    18. Emilio Gómez-Déniz & Jorge Pérez-Rodríguez, 2015. "Closed-form solution for a bivariate distribution in stochastic frontier models with dependent errors," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 43(2), pages 215-223, April.
    19. Abdulhamid A. Alzaid & Weaam M. Alhadlaq, 2023. "A New Family of Archimedean Copulas: The Half-Logistic Family of Copulas," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Moradian, Sogol & Olbert, Agnieszka I. & Gharbia, Salem & Iglesias, Gregorio, 2023. "Copula-based projections of wind power: Ireland as a case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    21. Limin Peng & Jason P. Fine, 2007. "Regression Modeling of Semicompeting Risks Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(1), pages 96-108, March.
    22. Naifar, Nader, 2012. "Modeling the dependence structure between default risk premium, equity return volatility and the jump risk: Evidence from a financial crisis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 119-131.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:7:y:2024:i:1:p:17-300:d:1352088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.