IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jstats/v5y2022i2p20-370d781788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Imputation of Composite Covariates in Survival Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Lily Clements

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • Alan C. Kimber

    (School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK)

  • Stefanie Biedermann

    (School of Mathematics and Statistics, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK)

Abstract

Missing covariate values are a common problem in survival studies, and the method of choice when handling such incomplete data is often multiple imputation. However, it is not obvious how this can be used most effectively when an incomplete covariate is a function of other covariates. For example, body mass index (BMI) is the ratio of weight and height-squared. In this situation, the following question arises: Should a composite covariate such as BMI be imputed directly, or is it advantageous to impute its constituents, weight and height, first and to construct BMI afterwards? We address this question through a carefully designed simulation study that compares various approaches to multiple imputation of composite covariates in a survival context. We discuss advantages and limitations of these approaches for various types of missingness and imputation models. Our results are a first step towards providing much needed guidance to practitioners for analysing their incomplete survival data effectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Lily Clements & Alan C. Kimber & Stefanie Biedermann, 2022. "Multiple Imputation of Composite Covariates in Survival Studies," Stats, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-13, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:20-370:d:781788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/2/20/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-905X/5/2/20/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan W. Bartlett & Tim P. Morris, 2015. "Multiple imputation of covariates by substantive-model compatible fully conditional specification," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 15(2), pages 437-456, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lauren J. Beesley & Jeremy M. G. Taylor, 2021. "A stacked approach for chained equations multiple imputation incorporating the substantive model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(4), pages 1342-1354, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jstats:v:5:y:2022:i:2:p:20-370:d:781788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.