IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v4y2014i4p549-560d41501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterizing Cyberbullying among College Students: Hacking, Dirty Laundry, and Mocking

Author

Listed:
  • Rajitha Kota

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA)

  • Shari Schoohs

    (Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53792, USA)

  • Meghan Benson

    (Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53713, USA)

  • Megan A. Moreno

    (Center for Child Health, Behavior and Development, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98121, USA
    Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98121, USA)

Abstract

Bullying behaviors occur across the lifespan and have increasingly migrated to online platforms where they are known as cyberbullying. The purpose of this study was to explore the phenomenon of cyberbullying among college students. Participants were recruited for focus groups through purposeful sampling, including recruitment from groups traditionally at risk for bullying. Focus groups discussed views and perceptions of cyberbullying on campuses. Groups were led by a trained facilitator and were audio recorded and manually transcribed. The constant comparative approach was used to identify themes and representative quotations. The 42 participants had an average age of 19.2 (SD = 1.2), 55% were female, 83% were Caucasian. Three themes emerged from the data: (1) lack of agreement on a definition of cyberbullying, but consensus on three representative scenarios: hacking, dirty laundry and mocking; (2) concerns with translating definitions of traditional bullying to cyberbullying; (3) opinions that cyberbullying may manifest differently in college compared to younger adolescents, including increased potential for long-term effects. College students were not in agreement about a theoretical definition, but they could agree upon specific representative instances of cyberbullying. Future studies could consider using common case examples or vignettes of cyberbullying, or creation of developmentally representative definitions by age group.

Suggested Citation

  • Rajitha Kota & Shari Schoohs & Meghan Benson & Megan A. Moreno, 2014. "Characterizing Cyberbullying among College Students: Hacking, Dirty Laundry, and Mocking," Societies, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-12, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:549-560:d:41501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/4/549/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/4/4/549/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:4:y:2014:i:4:p:549-560:d:41501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.