IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsoctx/v2y2012i1p14-26d16792.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Debating "the Social": Towards a Critique of Sociological Nostalgia

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Elliott

    (School of Social and Policy Studies, Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide 5001, Australia)

  • Bryan S. Turner

    (The Graduate Center, the City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA)

Abstract

Although sociology can be commonsensically and parsimoniously defined as the study of society, the problems of defining such terms as ‘society’, ‘the social’, and ‘the social system’ remain an ongoing irritant of sociological theory. In addition to these traditional conceptual problems, there is currently a strong sense that ‘society’ as an empirical reality and ‘society’ as a concept are in crisis. Given the contemporary view of ‘the end of the social’ there is also manifestly a potent and nostalgic interest in the past as a time of comforting solidarity and meaningfulness. To clarify this debate, we start by making a distinction between three approaches to society, namely structure, solidarity and creation. Nostalgia hinges around the certainties that followed from reliable social structures, and from the comfort of community. We illustrate these forms of nostalgia through an examination of the social philosophy of Alasdair MacIntyre. Recognizing that his criticisms of the loss of virtue represent a powerful indictment of modernity, we argue that past societies were also fractured by moral discord. More importantly, MacIntyre rules out the possibility of moral re-invention by excluding the rise of human rights as a moral framework. In conclusion, the forms of social creativity may not enjoy the ‘sticky’ solidarity of the past, but they do testify Georg Simmel’s idea of the social ( Vergesellschaftung ).

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Elliott & Bryan S. Turner, 2012. "Debating "the Social": Towards a Critique of Sociological Nostalgia," Societies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:14-26:d:16792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/2/1/14/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/2/1/14/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsoctx:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:14-26:d:16792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.