IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i12p244-d184896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria: A Persisting Challenge for Women’s Rights

Author

Listed:
  • Sanni Yaya

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, School of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, ON K1N5J1, Canada)

  • Bishwajit Ghose

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, School of International Development and Global Studies, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave E, Ottawa, ON K1N5J1, Canada)

Abstract

Although considered a violation of human rights, female genital mutilation (FGM) is a commonly accepted practice in Nigeria in the ritual and sociocultural context of the population. In recent years, there have been strong policy actions by Nigerian legislature to curb this practice. Despite that, FGM continues to be a widespread phenomenon. In this study, we aimed to report on the prevalence of FGM, women’s attitude towards this practice, and its association with selected sociodemographic factors. Methods : Nigeria Demographic and Health Surveys conducted in 2003, 2008 and 2013 provided the data for this study. The participants were married women aged between 15 and 49 years. Owing to the clustered nature of the data, a complex survey plan was created to account for cluster effects and sampling weights. Data were analysed using bivariate and multivariate regression techniques. Results : Overall prevalence of FGM was 38.9% (95% CI = 36.4–40.1), and that among their daughters was 17.4% (95% CI = 15.3–19.7). There has been a substantial increase in the prevalence of FGM in 2013 compared to its 2003 level. Respondents who had undergone circumcision were more likely to have their daughters circumcised. In all three surveys, almost all of the circumcisions were performed by traditional practitioners. In the regression analysis, respondent’s age, area and region of residency, religious affiliation, educational status, and household wealth appeared to be significant predictors of FGM. Conclusion: In Nigeria, FGM remains a widely prevalent phenomenon with an increasing number of women experiencing this practice. Important regional and socioeconomic disparities were observed in the prevalence which merit urgent policy attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanni Yaya & Bishwajit Ghose, 2018. "Female Genital Mutilation in Nigeria: A Persisting Challenge for Women’s Rights," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-13, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:12:p:244-:d:184896
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/12/244/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/12/244/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benedict Ekow Ocran & Godwin Agot Atiigah, 2022. "An Insider–Outsider Approach to Understanding the Prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation in Pusiga in the Upper East Region of Ghana," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:12:p:244-:d:184896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.