IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v2y2013i2p62-77d25028.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Perceptions of Criminality: The Case of the Maltese Walled City of Bormla

Author

Listed:
  • JosAnn Cutajar

    (Department of Sociology, Faculty of Arts, University of Malta, Room 253, Old Humanities Building (OH), University of Malta, Msida MSD 2080, Malta)

  • Saviour Formosa

    (Department of Criminology, Faculty for Social Wellbeing, University of Malta, Humanities A (Laws, Theology, Criminology), Msida MSD 2080, Malta)

  • Trevor Calafato

    (Department of Criminology, Faculty for Social Wellbeing, University of Malta, Humanities A (Laws, Theology, Criminology), Msida MSD 2080, Malta)

Abstract

This paper explores the situational factors that explain why crime in Bormla occurs in certain areas and not others. Bormla, one of the oldest cities in Malta, is the fifth crime hotspot on the Maltese Islands. The objective of this paper is to find out whether socio-demographic aspects and/or other contextual aspects are linked with the rate and type of crime that takes place within this city. A multi-method approach was adopted for the purposes of this paper. Statistics issued by the Malta police were analysed to find out which criminal offences occur there, and in which location. This analysis took place with the help of Geographic Information System (GIS) software. Qualitative and quantitative data collected through a needs assessment exercise conducted with a sample of Bormla respondents in 2009 and 2010 was also analysed to find out whether residents concurred with this official picture of what type of crime takes place there, and where it occurs. Residents were also asked whether they felt safe living in this crime hotspot, when and where they felt safe, and why.

Suggested Citation

  • JosAnn Cutajar & Saviour Formosa & Trevor Calafato, 2013. "Community Perceptions of Criminality: The Case of the Maltese Walled City of Bormla," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:62-77:d:25028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/2/2/62/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/2/2/62/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:2:y:2013:i:2:p:62-77:d:25028. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.