IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v13y2024i4p198-d1368865.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Victim Care or Defendant Rights? Assessing Public Attitudes towards Special Measures Designed to Support Vulnerable Witnesses at Trial

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Metson

    (Department of Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK)

  • Dominic Willmott

    (Department of Criminology, Sociology and Social Policy, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
    Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 53-238 Wrocław, Poland)

Abstract

The introduction of ‘special measures’ within England and Wales (i.e., provisions for vulnerable and intimidated witnesses at court) marked a significant change in legal tradition and trial procedures such that victim and witness care was repositioned as a primary concern alongside the longstanding rights afforded to defendants. As public perceptions towards the legitimacy of criminal justice procedure remain a key concern among legal scholars and social scientists, this study aimed to examine individual differences in attitudes held towards the rights afforded to complainants and defendants within English courts. Adopting a cross-sectional study design, 114 UK adults were recruited to take part in an online survey. Questions centered around the importance of providing adequate witness care whilst protecting defendants’ rights to a fair trial. A new measurement tool was developed to allow these attitudes to be systematically assessed and understood, termed the Attitudes Towards Vulnerable Victims Scale (ATVVS) . Results indicate that respondent age, gender, level of education, and belief in a just world are important determinants of public support for the use of special measures at trial as well as perceptions towards complainant and defendants’ rights. Taken together, findings indicate that misconceptions about vulnerable victims appear to underlie a lack of support for the use of special measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Metson & Dominic Willmott, 2024. "Victim Care or Defendant Rights? Assessing Public Attitudes towards Special Measures Designed to Support Vulnerable Witnesses at Trial," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-27, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:198-:d:1368865
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/4/198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/13/4/198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:13:y:2024:i:4:p:198-:d:1368865. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.